HOME
TOP TOPICS
+
NEW TOPICS
+
ABOUT
+
GET ATS
FORUMS
RECENT POSTS
CREATE ATS ACCOUNT
SEARCH
LOG IN
Directional nuclear warheads,
page 2
privacy
Pages:
<<
1
2
>>
ATS Members have flagged this thread
0
times
reply posted on 12-1-2003 @ 12:13 AM by
FreeMason
Yeah some people here are a bit zealous and don't always say intelligent things, then there's me, who is too cloistered at the moment to say much intelligent
but I am a damn genious if I'd just focus more on science and such
Then there are some career smarties, they have the goods on most info...someday I'll have to ask them for help
Sincerely,
no signature
reply posted on 31-3-2003 @ 08:38 AM by
mad scientist
Using the Global Positioning System, the United States has the ability to deliver a conventional or nuclear warhead within inches of its target, anywhere in the world. Our adversaries have responded by burying key command and control installations and nuclear and bioweapons laboratories deeper and deeper underground and inside mountains. The only ground penetrator in the current nuclear arsenal is the 1200-pound B61-11 gravity bomb, a wind-tunnel test model of which is shown above. It can penetrate about 20 ft. into a dry lakebed. To reach deeper required weapons designers to strengthen the package used to deliver warheads.
The solution would come in the form of an old weapon, a gun barrel. Artillerymen call the barrels of their guns "tubes." Dating to ancient China, these metallurgical marvels have steadily improved to the point at which they can withstand the forces needed to propel a projectile to the very edge of space. Looking at these historic weapons, scientists at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, N.M., realized they had the perfect enclosure for a deep-penetrating nuclear weapon. They took their idea to the field and dropped a mock bomb based on a "retired" artillery tube.
Although the test was successful, there remained a critical technical problem. As a projectile drives through rock, it experiences pressures that can cause even the strongest artillery tube alloys to flow like molten plastic. For a chemical explosive, the resulting deformation is not necessarily critical. However, for a nuclear weapon it is nothing short of catastrophic. Dropping a nuclear weapon that fails to explode is tantamount to giving an enemy a nuclear weapon of their own.
One solution, illustrated on the next page, is to prevent deformation by sheathing the artillery tube in an envelope made of virtually indestructible carbon-nanotube fabric. Recently, Sandia and Los Alamos National Laboratory, also in New Mexico, formed a joint research center, the objectives of which include developing techniques to create bulk quantities of nanomaterials like those needed to sheathe the next-generation bunker buster.
THE WHOLE ARTICLE
reply posted on 21-4-2003 @ 04:54 PM by
David
What if the "blast" wasnt actually a blast wave per se , but was some other kind of destructive power, like the proverbial giant hammer.
Theres no such thing as impossible
The laws of physics were defined by humans, i wouldnt cast them in iron.
Dave
Pages:
<<
1
2
>>
^^TOP^^
F-22 Pilots Told Not to Talk
Posted 17 days ago with
23
member flags
Military tanks being transported by the hundreds on trains (...NWO quickly approaching?)
Posted 15 days ago with
12
member flags
Purported U.S. Invasion of Iran Preliminary Draft? Selective Service to Resume Duties?
Posted 14 days ago with
9
member flags
Did the Integration of the NAZIS in America Caused Ideoligical Contamination of the US Government ?
Posted 13 days ago with
7
member flags
Several military convoys traveling through Kittery, Maine
Posted 18 days ago with
6
member flags
Combat Exoskeleton Marches Toward Afghanistan Deployment - CYBORGS!
Posted 1 days ago with
5
member flags
Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
Posted 9 days ago with
4
member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
Posted 2 days ago with
4
member flags
[close]