Intelligence Chiefs Diverge From Trump On Main Threats to US

a reply to: Sillyolme

Too bad trump is the cic.
Coats works at trumps pleasure, he is an employee.
Trump sets the agenda.
You don't like it, too bad.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How is it that this man is in direct opposition to the thousands of intelligences agents risking their lives the world over to gain information?
When he gets all of his information from Fox News.
He refuses to deal with any facts at all.
Oh and in his admonishment to the intel chiefs whom he said should probably go back to school it needs to be pointed out that he used the wrong spelling of their in his tweet when referring to Iran's economy. Ironically...

Here we go again... Just one more subject you guys have chosen to ignore this week.

www.defenseone.com...

You dont know any of this.
You wouldnt be fabricating any of this?

Twice a year, the Intel Chiefs give a status briefing to Congress. After each hearing, President Trump says there is something he does not agree with. Within 24 hours, SillyOlMe, or some other like-minded ATS member starts a thread.

This is just the latest of several. They want President Trump to be a follower, instead of a leader.

Lindsay Graham said today that Obama frustrated the hell out of Congress and the Intel Community by ignoring their advice so frequently.

With the exception of FOX NEWS, all other Media Outlets ignored Obama's resistance to Intel findings.

a reply to: AtlasHawk

Truly.

Too bad nobody has a lever to flush the toilet that has become the so-called US Intelligence community.

What a load of deep state ****, in need of a wipe, and then a flush. Then .. refill the bowl with newer, fresher, less compromised, more loyal individuals as replacements.

The intelligence community is totally disloyally backstabbing the executive branch.

wtf

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How is it that this man is in direct opposition to the thousands of intelligences agents risking their lives the world over to gain information?
When he gets all of his information from Fox News.
He refuses to deal with any facts at all.
Oh and in his admonishment to the intel chiefs whom he said should probably go back to school it needs to be pointed out that he used the wrong spelling of their in his tweet when referring to Iran's economy. Ironically...

Here we go again... Just one more subject you guys have chosen to ignore this week.

www.defenseone.com...

You dont know any of this.
You wouldnt be fabricating any of this?

Twice a year, the Intel Chiefs give a status briefing to Congress. After each hearing, President Trump says there is something he does not agree with. Within 24 hours, SillyOlMe, or some other like-minded ATS member starts a thread.

This is just the latest of several. They want President Trump to be a follower, instead of a leader.

Lindsay Graham said today that Obama frustrated the hell out of Congress and the Intel Community by ignoring their advice so frequently.

With the exception of FOX NEWS, all other Media Outlets ignored Obama's resistance to Intel findings.

I am just tired of people here straight up lying.

Who needs intelligence chiefs when you have Alex Jones and Roger Stone? Trump might as well poll ATS on how to handle his next move.

Who needs intelligence chiefs when you have Alex Jones and Roger Stone? Trump might as well poll ATS on how to handle his next move.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How is it that this man is in direct opposition to the thousands of intelligences agents risking their lives the world over to gain information?
When he gets all of his information from Fox News.
He refuses to deal with any facts at all.
Oh and in his admonishment to the intel chiefs whom he said should probably go back to school it needs to be pointed out that he used the wrong spelling of their in his tweet when referring to Iran's economy. Ironically...

Here we go again... Just one more subject you guys have chosen to ignore this week.

www.defenseone.com...

You dont know any of this.
You wouldnt be fabricating any of this?

Twice a year, the Intel Chiefs give a status briefing to Congress. After each hearing, President Trump says there is something he does not agree with. Within 24 hours, SillyOlMe, or some other like-minded ATS member starts a thread.

This is just the latest of several. They want President Trump to be a follower, instead of a leader.

Lindsay Graham said today that Obama frustrated the hell out of Congress and the Intel Community by ignoring their advice so frequently.

With the exception of FOX NEWS, all other Media Outlets ignored Obama's resistance to Intel findings.

I am just tired of people here straight up lying.

Try viewing them in a positive light. Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, they are the bearer of GIFTS to the Republican party and President Trump.

a reply to: Mandroid7

I do not believe the intelligence community is controlled.
Press bad I know.... figures.
but thats not the topic son.
Its amazing how you guys cant confront this issue head on.
You have to approach it from the rear... fake news yada yada yada...
I saw Dan Coats, I saw Gina Haspel, I heard them.
Do you think that the press faked that?
Do you think that either of those people would get on twitter and speak directly to the people if what had been portrayed on the news was faked?

a reply to: Cassi3l

Is that supposed to say what I think it is?
Oh heavens. And to have it documented on the internet...

Speaking of 1984.

Remember when Bernie Sanders made a pilgrimage to Nicaragua, then Moscow, while those countries were still communist?

Remember when Bill Clinton couldn't fight in Vietnam, because he as a Rhodes Scholar... in Moscow?

Remember Bill Clinton, getting Campaign contributions from Buddhist Temples with links to communist China?

Remember in 2008, when Hillary's Chinese contribution "bundler" went to prison for improper donations to her campaign?

Remember when the first thing Obama did as president, was to tell the Polish, that America would not be providing them wish a missile defense shield, that Bush had promised to install?

Back when Obama was president, Russia was our ally. Remember when Romney was talking about how Putin was a threat to the west, how Obaama said in an election debate, "Romney, the 1980's called---they want their foreign policy back!!!" And everybody laughed on cue because only the paranoid right wing didn't trust Russia.

Remember when Obama was caught on mike, telling the Russian leadership that he'd "have more flexibility" after his re-election????

Remember SOS John Kerry giving the Iranian's everything, if they would just stay in the treaty process? (BTW, did the intel community say they think Iran is a threat today? must have missed that quote...)

Remember SOS Hilary Clinton signing off on the Russian controlled conglomerate buying 20% of US uranium reserves?

But none of those were security threats.

The deep state is at war with this president. He won't play ball.

a reply to: Hypntick

Yes. This is still growing though and I am sure has gone far beyond APT29 and CozyBear and Guccifer2.
It is reported that China and Iran are dipping a toe into cyber espionage. The security of our data in the future is going to be even more important.
Our election process is for the most part paper and pen. The ballots are counted by a machine.
Future generations are going to demand cyber access to the process as lives become even more busy with work and family.
If that process is to be protected we need to start figuring it out now.
As for influencing people's choices. Political ads aim to do just that. An attack using established advertising tactics and motives could have as much influence on a person's choice as a legitimate political ad.
They need to be identified by the platform you are correct. And maybe public service messages helping people identify fake news sources. Though some will shun that as influential in and of itself.

a reply to: Wildmanimal

Lets talk about why trump lies about the other threats for now.
The friggin wall has already taken up too much band width on this site.
This is trump lying again.
WHY? What is his end game?
Why if the news is a lie did the White House cancel their intelligence briefing yesterday morning?
www.thedailybeast.com...

RAIN CHECK White House Abruptly Canceled Trump’s Meeting With Intel Chiefs The cancellation came a day after top officials gave testimony to congress seemingly contradicting key parts of the president’s foreign policy. Betsy Woodruff, Asawin Suebsaeng 01.31.19 8:31 PM ET EXCLUSIVE Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty The White House abruptly canceled the President’s daily intelligence briefing on Wednesday, the morning after top intelligence officials testified before Congress, The Daily Beast has learned. Reached for comment, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders simply said, “It was moved.” She did not go into further detail as to why and did not respond to follow-up inquiries.

Why couldn't he face them after they had their press time?
Why couldn't he confront them on their incorrect data face to face?
The big tough guy cant have a face to face confrontation when he knows he is full of schitte.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Hypntick

Yes. This is still growing though and I am sure has gone far beyond APT29 and CozyBear and Guccifer2.
It is reported that China and Iran are dipping a toe into cyber espionage. The security of our data in the future is going to be even more important.
Our election process is for the most part paper and pen. The ballots are counted by a machine.
Future generations are going to demand cyber access to the process as lives become even more busy with work and family.
If that process is to be protected we need to start figuring it out now.
As for influencing people's choices. Political ads aim to do just that. An attack using established advertising tactics and motives could have as much influence on a person's choice as a legitimate political ad.
They need to be identified by the platform you are correct. And maybe public service messages helping people identify fake news sources. Though some will shun that as influential in and of itself.

Those of us who are not low iQ lemmings can fully figure out by ourselves what the fake news sources are. We don't need your Orwellian minders to do so.

North Korea - Obama/Hillary did NOTHING for Americans jailed there. Trump freed them.

ISIS - Hillary supplied ISIS with weapons from Libya, she should be tried for Treason. Trump did not.

Russia - Hillary cashed 100s of millions from Russia for selling Russia control 20% of US uranium supplies. Treason. Again.

China - In the 90s, Clintons sold missile technology to China. Still more Treason

Finally, the whole issue about the Special Prosecutor looking at Russia's influence on US elections because of Hillary's email should OBVIOUSLY look at why Hillary's claasified emails were in an unauthorized unprotected server in her home in the first place. More and more Treason.

Deny ignorance

a reply to: Vector99

In the words of Roger Stone its better to be talked about than not talked about.
If you cant be famous be infamous.

Now.... back to our regularly scheduled programing.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Sillyolme
How is it that this man is in direct opposition to the thousands of intelligences agents risking their lives the world over to gain information?
When he gets all of his information from Fox News.
He refuses to deal with any facts at all.
Oh and in his admonishment to the intel chiefs whom he said should probably go back to school it needs to be pointed out that he used the wrong spelling of their in his tweet when referring to Iran's economy. Ironically...

Here we go again... Just one more subject you guys have chosen to ignore this week.

www.defenseone.com...

You dont know any of this.
You wouldnt be fabricating any of this?

Twice a year, the Intel Chiefs give a status briefing to Congress. After each hearing, President Trump says there is something he does not agree with. Within 24 hours, SillyOlMe, or some other like-minded ATS member starts a thread.

This is just the latest of several. They want President Trump to be a follower, instead of a leader.

Lindsay Graham said today that Obama frustrated the hell out of Congress and the Intel Community by ignoring their advice so frequently.

With the exception of FOX NEWS, all other Media Outlets ignored Obama's resistance to Intel findings.

I am just tired of people here straight up lying.

Try viewing them in a positive light. Like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, they are the bearer of GIFTS to the Republican party and President Trump.

It is just mewling and caterwauling from sore losers who still can't deal with reality.
It will get worse when Trump is re elected in 2020.

a reply to: xuenchen

From what I hear he doesn't have the capacity to sit through an intelligence briefing so what the frock does he know?
Its not like he has any idea what is going on. He gets briefed by Sean Hannity and his friends at Fox.

a reply to: whywhynot

Im the only one around here who can apparently.

a reply to: Metallicus

He just makes it up as he goes along.
He is a Bull s.....iter from way back. He thinks he can BS his way through a presidency.
He is finding out the hard way that the games of south Queens do not play in DC and on the world stage.

a reply to: carewemust

I guess they have to find something to whine about, with rr telling him he WAS NOT under investigation and all.
Sad trombone is sad.

a reply to: Sillyolme

If anything this article just highlights how Trump is doing a lot to solve these issues... he's at least met with NK in an effort to reduce their nuclear threat, and he's made great strides in removing ISIS from the face of the Earth, if you just listen to the MSM you'd probably think Syria was still swarming with terrorists but that is most certainly not the case. And I'd also say Trump does take the security threat from China very seriously, the real issue here is that dems want him to take an equally hard stance against Russia but he doesn't seem to do that. The main reason for that is probably because he's trying to work with Russia to defeat ISIS and also because he doesn't view Putin as his arch enemy, he knows that no collusion occurred and he knows China is a much more serious threat in reality, especially in the cyber domain.