It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Aliya Prokofeya announces contact with Aliens in Pyramid UFOs at the FN

page: 9
53
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:23 PM
link   
a reply to: KABOURIS72

Hahaha yeah I should have done that..

Uhhg why do they always fake these things I hate that . There should be a fine for faking these things




posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:29 PM
link   
a reply to: KABOURIS72

Apparently you are the one who doesn't read.
Everyone thinks this is a hoax, but not everyone is convinced it has been debunked with the Erdogan video.
The movements and clothing are the same in the Trump speech as well.
The Erdogan video is probably the source, but with other similar movements and clothing worn during other speeches, and without exact movement 1 for 1 from each video, I don't accept the video debunked.

With that said. The video is 100% a fake. That's just my intuition. It sure was exciting for a bit though.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: 0bserver1

If it's faked to promote something we should boycott
Whatever it may be, that would deter them in the future



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
This was a well thought out hoax that had diplomatic assistance (IMHO).
Who ever was in the translator booth that took the video, seems to have prior knowledge
of what the intent of their video was to be used. Russian chick was also in on it.
But why the elaborate fake?

Does ANYONE actually take the UN seriously anymore?

Iron Mountain perhaps?

If it was a hoax, why has history been unfolding perfectly in step with the report?


General MacArthur made such Alien invasion speeches on a few occasions not just once. There are many examples of prominent men who made such speeches. Are they all lunatics? Do not be deceived. This coming strong delusion is a very well laid out plan. The Illuminists have been sowing the seeds of this plan for the past 100 years. A very good overview of the Illuminist plan is: Iron Mountain BluePrint For Global Tyranny! The Rise of The Mystery Babylon Whore! The EndTimes Grand Delusion Plan!

For the past 2 years, I have noticed a clear change in the tone of the MSM towards UFOs and Aliens. They are now actively accepting and promoting it. We no longer see much mocking and ridicule from them. The tone of the ruling elite has also changed. Many countries throughout the world are now releasing their UFO files!

If you insist on classifying these people as nut cases, how do you explain President Ronald Reagan’s UFO Alien invasion speech at the United Nations in 1987? How do you explain his talk with Gorbachev on this issue. Ronald Reagan made at least 4 speeches and public statements during his term as president on this issue. Are these random rantings of a senile unstable mind? I don’t think so.

socioecohistory.wordpress.com...

To achieve their WORLD ORDER they need a global threat as an environmental catastrophe, also an invasion by aliens from outer space was given serious consideration according to the The report from Iron Mountain a secret investigation ordered in 1961 by the Kennedy administration whereby this human-animal hybrid (Übermensch German for "Overman, Overhuman, Above-Human, Superman, Super-human, Ultrahuman, Higher-Person, Higher-Being"; in contrast to the other-worldliness of Christianity that will be used for a false flag alien invasion to get the globe under a World Order where Aliens will be blamed for the stealth mass murderous depopulation and everything that happened in the past...

sites.google.com...

The planned global threat: Alien UFO invasion by the New World Order. This will be the strong delusion as stated in the bible.

– 2 aspects of this Alien UFO invasion: first using new technologies and second the real ‘Aliens’, fallen angels and Nephilim.

– Eisenhower’s UFO, Alien meeting and subsequent agreement? The return of the Nephilim and fallen angels advance guard?

– Another world war to build up the United Nations’ world army and police force?

socioecohistory.wordpress.com... elusion-plan/

On November 26, 1976, the report was reviewed in the book section of The Washington Post by Herschel McLandress, the pen name for Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith wrote that he knew firsthand of the report’s authenticity because he had been invited to participate in its creation; that although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project secret; and that while he doubted the wisdom of letting the public know about the report, he agreed totally with its conclusions.

He wrote: “As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document, so would I testify to the validity of its conclusions. My reservation relates only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public.”

Report from Iron Mountain

How do you protect yourself (Author) and have damage control? You call it a hoax in the end. Six weeks later, in an Associated Press dispatch from London, Galbraith went even further and jokingly admitted that he was a member of the conspiracy. That, however, did not settle the issue. The following day, Galbraith backed off. When asked about his 'conspiracy' statement, he replied: 'For the first time since Charles II The Times has been guilty of a misquotation... Nothing shakes my conviction that it was written by either Dean Rusk or Mrs. Clare Booth Luce. '

The original reporter reported the following six days later: 'Misquoting seems to be a hazard to which Professor Galbraith is prone. The latest edition of the Cambridge newspaper Varsity quotes the following (tape recorded) interchange: 'Interviewer: 'Are you aware of the identity of the author of Report from Iron Mountain?' Galbraith: 'I was in general a member of the conspiracy, but I was not the author. I have always assumed that it was the man who wrote the foreword - Mr. Lewin So, on at least three occasions, Galbraith publicly endorsed the authenticity of the report, but denied that he wrote it.

Report from Iron Mountain by Leonard C. Lewin

I realized that proceeding with caution was important, especially given that I had come to a negative conclusion regarding SWFQW. The first document very much appears to be a forgery or fraud likely perpetrated by someone wanting to “catch” the elite red-handed in their malevolent plans to take us out. Thus, I operated as if the Lewin case had never taken place. Instead, I jumped into the document to measure it at face value as much as possible.

This was a tip that the author(s) was very likely a person (or persons) of the political left. Although it is extra-textual information, Lewin was indeed a political leftist... This creates a strange scenario. What we have is a situation wherein the TBR is real, RFIM is likely a hoax, ‘Sphere’ is obviously fiction, and SWFQW is likely a forgery or fraud.

Finally, one can find several external real world white papers that call for plans of action that are every bit as nefarious as that which is found in RFIM. On the other side, the debunkers and skeptics must step back and ask themselves why is it that despite their constant claims to the contrary, real world documents have poured out over the years that are just as dark and foreboding as RFIM and even SWFQW.

medium.com...@JDSApollo/the-report-from-iron-mountain-193db77027f4



edit on 1.31.2019 by Murgatroid because: Felt like it...



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:52 PM
link   
Probably fake, but the videos in comparison are different in that the guard is walking in one video, and standing still in the other. So perhaps it's a mix of videos, who knows. Certainly not identical however.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: fleabit
Probably fake, but the videos in comparison are different in that the guard is walking in one video, and standing still in the other. So perhaps it's a mix of videos, who knows. Certainly not identical however.


Agreed. Wouldn't everything have to match exactly to call this 100% hoax via the Ergodan vid? I'm not saying it not faked, but the vids clearly aren't the same.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 01:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: ufoofinterest
Here's the video comparison.


Off to the hoaxes bin where it belongs!


This kind of garbage has ruined the environment for any meaningful or real disclosures.

Mission accomplished?



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Spacespider

you are kidding, right? all conspiracy sites are talking about it right now



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: nofear39
a reply to: Weagle



credible people like Tyler from SECURETEAM10


LOL



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 02:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: humanoidlord
99% of the forum menbers here don't speak russian
help us pls


Even though I think this video is 100% fake, I at least watched it before assuming anything at all.

You clearly had no intention of watching the video and based your opinion on nothing more than a woman's name and assumed the audio must be in Russian.

I really do hope that nobody here takes anything you try debunking seriously from this point on. I will make it a point to call you out anytime I see you attempt this again.

That was pathetic. Plain and simple.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: KiwiNite

originally posted by: nofear39
a reply to: Weagle



credible people like Tyler from SECURETEAM10


LOL


Tyler is far from credible and this seriously made me LMAO

See his recent live stream where "they took it down"?

Funny how his stream went down, but the chat with Super Chat turned on ran perfectly fine and collected donations, one of them being a few grand, for over an hour. Hasn't done another one since because he knows people didn't buy into that BS about "losing his feed".

Credible? LMAO He's all about selling merchandise and has never done any of his own research and bases all his videos on e-mail submissions from other people. Just go look at his reaction to when Tom DeLonge started his UFO talk and eventually actually made a few things happen. He was talking about him and his effort like it was all a sad joke. It eventually started getting things released and all of a sudden little Tyler stopped talking about him.

That guy is a joke and it's sad how many take him seriously in his comments.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   
Hahaha.....hahahahahahaha

Ahh... people believe this..



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: nightmare_david

originally posted by: humanoidlord
99% of the forum menbers here don't speak russian
help us pls


Even though I think this video is 100% fake, I at least watched it before assuming anything at all.

You clearly had no intention of watching the video and based your opinion on nothing more than a woman's name and assumed the audio must be in Russian.

I really do hope that nobody here takes anything you try debunking seriously from this point on. I will make it a point to call you out anytime I see you attempt this again.

That was pathetic. Plain and simple.


Sweeper Maid is as credible as Soucha Fail, Wikiweaks or Snoops.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 04:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: nightmare_david

originally posted by: humanoidlord


You clearly had no intention of watching the video and based your opinion on nothing more than a woman's name and assumed the audio must be in Russian.

I really do hope that nobody here takes anything you try debunking seriously from this point on. I will make it a point to call you out anytime I see you attempt this again.


I think you're being a bit harsh on Humanoidlord, who's a thoughtful guy generally and not a 'debunker' per se - he simply made a swift, incorrect assumption.

What's weird is that five other posters 'starred' his post in agreement.

edit on 31-1-2019 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Spacespider

It WAS A good fake, but there was still a whiff of "off" about it... her stiffness and lack of interaction (not to mention the whole bad Hollywood script feel of it).

Spanning the uncanny valley where artificial is undetectable to everyone is likely a difficult enterprise, but it's true that enough effort will produce something that will fool everyone, all the time, heh.

Guess we'll have to return to trusting intuition, awareness and context.



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 05:32 PM
link   
a reply to: parkourer

astr0 any one??

i kid of course

the UN video is very well done



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: ManyMasks

mostly likely the lady's weird russian version of TTSA



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: nightmare_david

read my follow up comment, i clicked first in the link leading to the woman's channel by mistake



posted on Jan, 31 2019 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ConfusedBrit

yeah that was a bit harsh, i saw this thread right after it was posted and din't think much of it, so i clicked a random link in the OP and there was some stuff in russian there



posted on Feb, 1 2019 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: IMSAM
video of same speech side by side






Thanks for busting this,looks like we were used as useful idiots,twitter is full of people asking her about it and her galactica site has gone 200% in visits im sure



@humanoid please edit your posts instead of posting 3 messages in a row




top topics



 
53
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join