It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why after an absence of 3 decades? Whats stopping anyone from doing it??
We have satellites orbiting Earth that can take a photo of a pimple on Madonna's butt, yet we still can't get an Apollo landing site pic other than that Clementine photo with that stupid dot that could be anything?
Where have you seen a satellite photo that can give you that much detail? Sure, we've heard of them, but spy satellite images are not to be seen by us. Even so, we dont' have satellites that strong orbitting the moon, so you dont' get images showing that much detail.
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
Fact 1: It would appear obvious to anyone with even half a damn brain the footage was fake.
Fact 2: It would also appear that it is possible there is evidence to suggest the Apollo equipment is on the moon.
I don't know what to conclude to this.
1. If the moon landing was fake the KGB would of exposed it?
Are the Russians smart enough to expose the OKC bombing scam? How about 9/11? What about the WTC Bombing in 1993?
I think you guys should check out the following links:
See that dot there? No, not that dot. THAT dot.....see, what more proof do you need? Plain as day, isn't it? Boy, you sure look foolish now for ever thinking we didn't land on the moon!
what do you want? A picture of the shadow cast by the flag? Wanna count the grooves in Armstrongs bootprints? How about you whip up the fantastic amazing camera to do it.
Meanwhile, satellites will be orbiting taking high resolution imagery of the entire surface, and you just might be able to see the shadow cast by the flag, and just maybe the grooves in Armstrongs bootprints. Will you then declare that beyond all doubt they were edited in?
Moon tech has regressed? So you must be saying that because we haven't gone back.. that's the technology regression. So what exactly was there to do on the Moon in 79? 84? 90? Twiddle our thumbs and wait for present day and soon to come 'Moon Tech' to be invented?
Originally posted by turbonium
Just a damn picture of the buggy or buggy tracks or lem base will do. Is that really so much to ask for? Why wouldn't NASA do it for PR purposes alone - John Q Public doesn't give a lump about the Shuttle missions. As for what to do on the Moon, they have been discussing all the reasons in many recent articles, take a browse for them, they are easy to find.
Compare the Shuttle to Apollo: The Shuttles have been in use consistently for 24 years on over 100 missions orbiting Earth, and NASA says there is much to learn from future missions. But you say they learned everything about going to and from the Moon and discovered and studied everything possible about the Moon in 7 total missions over 4 years, so they stopped doing it 35 years ago?
Originally posted by ThaJoka
Someone got to tell me how the flag can be moving in this movie.
Also, has anyone seen the movie "A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon." ?