It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ngchunter
...
Infinite pitch, roll, and yaw axes huh? No such thing exists BB.
...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
...
Folks, if you can't taxi a Cessna, and can't understand what 'straight and level' means....you don't have any business flying an airplane!!!!!!
Originally posted by Big-Brain
But a piece of metal (LEM) has infinite attitudes in 3D space. It has a front part and a back part (where there is the rocket engine) but has not right and left, has not top and bottom. It has infinite right parts and infinite left parts, infinite top parts and infinite bottom parts.
Therefore it has infinite pitch, roll, yaw axes.
Due to this big confusion, it doesn't know what attitude must keep during flight and therefore it can't fly.
For this reason there is no video of NASA's swindlers showing the 150 flights made by that full scale LEM at Langley crane.
Biggest error, they understood it was impossible and therefore they swindled all the world with the help of Kubrick.
Originally posted by ngchunter
...
What you don't seem to understand is that the burden of proof is not on us to provide 150 videos of the LLRF at langley, the burden of proof is on YOU to disprove any evidence that refutes your theory that vertical landings are impossible.
...
Originally posted by ngchunter
LOL Kubrick couldn't have faked the vacuum dependent non-billowing motion of moon dust in the apollo videos.
..., the burden of proof is on YOU to disprove any evidence that refutes your theory that vertical landings are impossible.
Originally posted by Big-Brain
You must prove that you are able to land going backwards with a rocket.
WITH TRUE VIDEOS TELECASTED FROM ALL THE TELEVISIONS OF ALL COUNTRIES.
Instead you continue to show us 3D animated cartoons:
Originally posted by ngchunter
...
Thanks for that document, it looks like a really fascinating and detailed read. I'll definately save that for perusal.
...
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
...
Your continued insistence that the LLRV/LLTV couldn't fly is ludicrous.
...
Originally posted by Big-Brain
Therefore LLRVTs and LEMs could fly without computers, could be piloted manually.
In that document they never talk about the importance of the computer to fly LLRVTs.
Very strange.
Incredible.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
...
The entire last half of Chapter 1 (pages 43 to 56, going by the page number printed in the book) discusses the attitide control system. It doesn't talk a lot about computers because much of the system was "electro-mechanical", not "electronic", and was mainly controlled by simple information given by the gyros.
...
Originally posted by Big-Brain
Several readers are beginning to understand I'm right.