It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I’m starting to receive a trickle of email informing me that the Mythbusters are tackling the Moon Hoax myth.
Yes, well, I need to divulge a secret: I know about it. I served as an informal advisor on the show. :-)
Second, no, before you ask: I have no idea how the testing went. They didn’t tell me anything about the results! Grrrrr.
Originally posted by -bigbrain-
You would be right if they had been put in solitary confinement for 3 years.
Are there in this forum any persons that think the 3 Heroes of the Space are hiding the truth and are afraid someone can unmask them?
Originally posted by .bigbrain.
Also Aldrin and Collins don't seem very happy.
Originally posted by jra
And so it begins again.
Originally posted by .bigbrain.
Also Aldrin and Collins don't seem very happy.
Yeah, because we all know how fun and exciting doing a press conference is...
It's pretty bad when your evidence for Apollo being faked is due to some ones facial expression during a formal event. If you're going to judge the validity of Apollo based on facial expressions, than what do you have to say about this one? They've just returned from the Moon and they look happy.
Originally posted by jra
And so it begins again.
Originally posted by .bigbrain.
Also Aldrin and Collins don't seem very happy.
Yeah, because we all know how fun and exciting doing a press conference is...
Originally posted by chromatico
reply to post by _bigbrain_
We have mountains of physical proof the moon landings were done. Don't be disingenuous.
Originally posted by chromatico
reply to post by _bigbrain_
We have mountains of physical proof the moon landings were done. Don't be disingenuous.
Originally posted by jra
reply to post by pepsi78
Yes, they had training simulators and tried to simulate the appearance of the Moon as best they could. I'm guessing you're trying to imply that these were used to fake the actual Moon landings?
Originally posted by _bigbrain_
Please, don't ban me over and over again. I promise I will behave politely.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Originally posted by jra
reply to post by pepsi78
Yes, they had training simulators and tried to simulate the appearance of the Moon as best they could. I'm guessing you're trying to imply that these were used to fake the actual Moon landings?
Yes but not suspended on a scale, that does not make sence, you would do that only if you are filming and do not want to see the background in to focus, if you only want to see the black sky in the background then you build a scale 60 feet up, you pull up a lem with wiers you paint craters with a brush over plastic and you start filming.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Originally posted by chromatico
reply to post by _bigbrain_
We have mountains of physical proof the moon landings were done. Don't be disingenuous.
Yea right.
And other mountains showing moon sets , lems suspended on a platform above painted as a moon set, and rock piking, sur it was all done for training, training on platforms suspended with the lem pulled up with wiers over the moon set above with plastic craters.
Originally posted by ngchunter
...
You're forgetting something, there is no video of the LEM landing. Therefore that setup could not have been for filming.
...
Originally posted by _bigbrain_
Originally posted by ngchunter
...
You're forgetting something, there is no video of the LEM landing. Therefore that setup could not have been for filming.
...
You are right.
This biggest crane
had to be used to test the capability of Snoopy to land going backwards suspended to it.
But NASA engineers were not able to build a rocket that could land going backwards, in fact rockets are made to go forward.
Try to balance a glass on your forefinger and you will understand how much difficult it is.
Your finger should move in all right directions at highest speed to oppose to gravity forces that make the glass to fall down at 360 degrees.
It is impossible to balance the glass.
Imagine you are inside the glass and you must balance it with a joystick.
Since you are inside, you can't see where you are falling down fastly then if you pilot Snoopy inside it, you can't do it manually.
Instead Stafford in Apollo 10 did it and piloted Snoopy manually as if it was a helicopter.
But a rocket is not a helicopter. Helicopter is totally different and flies in the air.