It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MisterSpock
I'm sure if all the brits that fought in world war 2 could see their country today.....they would have just let the nazis have it.
Weakness rules them now, it's all down hill from here.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ohhh look another let’s annoy the Brits thread....
I get fed of of these threads, they always feel deliberately antagonistic, feel like you’re just trying to trigger bits with this bollocks.
I live hear, we do not live in a “Nancy state”like ever where we have imperfect laws that sometimes though up some weird stuff.
The ADF says the district "retaliated against the student's parent for reporting the sexual harassment" by identifying the mother as the "responsible party" in their referral of the incident to the Georgia Division of Family and Children Services.
Thomas says the DFCS investigated her because of the district's report against her.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Propagandalf
No crime was committed though, no law broke, the police just record these as “incidents”it is literally just saying there was a incident where someone felt they were the victim of a hate crime we investigated it, not crime, as such it gets marked down as a hate incident.
Means nothing, stop pretending like the police have just gave this guy jail time or a record because they haven’t.
originally posted by: paraphi
Yeah, shocking isn't it? But calm down, because if someone makes a complaint to the police they are duty-bound to investigate. Of course we don't know if the complainant was told to stop wasting police time.
PS It's Nanny State.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: paraphi
PS It's Nanny State.
That makes sense. I was going to ask "What's a Nancy state?"
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: Propagandalf
No crime was committed though, no law broke, the police just record these as “incidents”it is literally just saying there was a incident where someone felt they were the victim of a hate crime we investigated it, not crime, as such it gets marked down as a hate incident.
Means nothing, stop pretending like the police have just gave this guy jail time or a record because they haven’t.
If you're fine with being investigate by police for retweeting a silly poem then you're a lost cause.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Oh settle down.
You hammer trump and the right every chance you get.
Quid pro quo
originally posted by: Propagandalf
originally posted by: paraphi
Yeah, shocking isn't it? But calm down, because if someone makes a complaint to the police they are duty-bound to investigate. Of course we don't know if the complainant was told to stop wasting police time.
PS It's Nanny State.
No, it's Nancy State.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Oh settle down.
You hammer trump and the right every chance you get.
Quid pro quo
Sorry I forgot it’s ok to bash us because we say bad things about orange man
Grow up!
originally posted by: Bluntone22
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Oh settle down.
You hammer trump and the right every chance you get.
Quid pro quo
Sorry I forgot it’s ok to bash us because we say bad things about orange man
Grow up!
Fix doctor who and we'll talk