It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: narrator
a reply to: scrounger
I just wanted to respond to a couple of your points.
Point 2: I was a teacher for 8 years and only got a raise when I switched districts, every district I taught in had spending freezes and couldn't give raises to anyone. Meaning, unless I changed districts, I wouldn't have gotten a raise in 8 years. So that isn't necessarily true that you get a raise every single year as a teacher.
where did I say it was 100 percent every district... Ill (for sake of discussion) take you at face value what your saying where you worked. it is not the norm and I ask for facts to justify if that is what is claimed. but to be fair you didnt bitch but did what the taxpayers do ... went somewhere else
Your last point: I left teaching for a better paying job. Of the 40ish people that graduated in my class from college (I graduated in December rather than the traditional class in May, which had a lot more people) only about 8 are still teaching. All have left the profession for better paying jobs.
again I give you credit for doing not saying you leave for a better job. However the rest of your class not teaching we cannot realistically presume that they all left because they wanted better jobs. some may have . but all? your saying none left because they were fired, could not handle it, retired, got married and didnt want to work, ect? Even if they all left for better jobs given the amount of teachers that make that thread still are teaching kinda negates its a majority trend
Saying you value the job if they're good at it: If the pay is crap, why would you expect great workers to take the job?
Its called WORK ETHIC and JOB EXPECTATION. First you WILLINGLY entered teaching KNOWING the pay AND BENIFITS it gave. second ANY EMPLOYEE is EXPECTED to perform at a level the job REQUIRES. I cant find ANY JOB (even teaching contracts) that say if you "feel" the pay is crap you can do a crappy job. Outside of teaching (being protected by the powerful union) if you tried this logic you be FIRED. Yes I EXPECT if you willingly took the job KNOWING THE PAY AND REQUIREMENTS you fulfill them. besides doesnt th is line of thought kinda torpedo the "we are doing this for the children" montra ? seems your "doing it for the children" as long as you feel your being paid right. in short "the children are a pawn, not the reason"
My ex was voted teacher of the year in her district in 2007, by 2009 she was no longer teaching because she found a job that doubled her salary to 66k.
Ok so they left for a better job... how exactly does this justify the "poor me they hate teachers and pay us crap" line? again as ALL TAXPAYERS face with non teaching jobs.. dont like it, leave.
The best teachers are being pushed out because they're realizing that they can do much more for their families by taking non-teaching jobs, while a lot of today's teachers aren't that good at the job, but don't want to leave the profession because they'll be more easily fired for being lazy/bad at other jobs.
thats an emotional attempt at justification. any job you can make that excuse and normallhy be ignored (at best) or laughed at (at worst). Add to it if you dont want to leave the profession then DONT. Just (as many do) ACCEPT the good and the bad. but lets be REALISTIC for a minute. good teachers if treated like alot of professions they would be making MORE than the average or bad ones. Its called MERIT pay / benifits. but YOUR UNIONS fight that concept every step of the way. so since you as a whole KEEP THAT UNION (or at minimum what it fights against) then dont ask us THE TAXPAYER to up your salary along with the average or poor teachers. now your last comment stop the bs. teachers dont leave their jobs to "because theyll be more easily fired for being lasy/bad". they STAY IN TEACHING for that protection.
Pay teachers more, and you'll attract higher quality teachers, and then you'll feel more value in your taxes going to public schools.
Im sorry but as a TAXPAYER i am paying for a product (education) and EXPECT a good bang for my buck. If it were any other product or service if I feel I am not getting what I paid for I GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. I dont have say an oil change place tell me Ill "feel more value" if I pay more and be held to just them. It is up to YOU THE TEACHER to either provide the value I am saying I expect to get. If you dont like it you dont provide it (leave) or I have ablility to go somewhere else. Again the first I dont see teachers doing (just lip service) and the second your unions fight tooth and nail against.
Higher pay results in better hires in every single job category, why wouldn't the same thing work with teaching?
originally posted by: Nyiah
Listen, oh naturally smart and wise one. Did you get where you are in life teaching yourself to read, spell, become competent at arithmetic & basic science, history? You did that all yourself, right? Just you, and a stick to scratch letters and numbers in the dirt?
No? Mama helped?
What was that? All mommy touched on was basic reading and numbers? WOW, it all clicked for you, huh? What is that, some kind of genetic knowledge trick?
originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: scrounger
Look who's talking about being emotional. For F's sake,
Hmm you dropping the F bomb (well as much as ATS would allow) in accusing me of being emotional. Notice I never used profanity just strongly worded FACTS or opinons. not a good start and a fail in attempt at adult discussion.
you don't even consider varying cost of living spreads across the country. The 30k a teacher may live large on in Appalachia is NOT going to go far in San Francisco.
Here is what the average range and pay for teacher in San Francisco coming from source salary.com. "$62,017 to $82,006 with the average base salary of $71,034." If your gonna make an argument you need to use FACTS not a clearly emotional rant that I destroyed with facts within a .02 second google search. Emotional rant fail two
Pay has to mimic local standards, or say hello to shortages.
your comment about local standards again is emotional non fact based rant . you dont signify comparing to what? for example are you saying say a garbage man should compaire his pay to a heart doctor in the area? common AGAIN if your gonna debate use FACTS not emotions. BTW what shortages are there in teachers... be SPECIFIC since in most areas if a teacher leaves there is another to take their place.
You do a lot to bitch and moan, but do nothing to address the fact that teacher shortages lead to oversized classrooms in the 90's/'00's. I remember when classes used to max at 12-15 kids. WTF happened?
well to start the population got bigger and it was not economical or feasable to have class sizes that small in larger urban areas. in fact I hate to bust your emotional rant but even small rural school districts had larger class sizes due to consolidation of students due to what they could afford for teachers. but I digress your numbers may have been true for you (for purposes of discussion) but that size was not common even "back then". But to further deal in reality the increased class sizes we STILL had better outcome in 50 60 70 with less money spend. even further (other factors do play a role) class sizes are 20+ in private schools with teachers making less with better outcomes.
Whine-asses like you wanted to pay less, therefore there were less people willing to do the work on less income and the inevitable happened -- classroom sizes spiked. You want teachers to adequately maintain order in & teach effectively in a class of 30+ kids today for 30 grand or less, holy s#, you pathetically cheap fools. Yeah, you get what you pay for all right -- kids with a run of the room and no incentive to listen to a teacher who quite literally does not have the time spread among that many kids per period to pay attention to each individual kid anymore. That's the difference between when I was in school in the 90's, and today. You want a whole lot more, on far less. That's not going to work. And you have the balls to bitch about healthcare packages? You've completely MISSED everything wrong with the education system today, and bennies has nothing to do with it.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Nyiah
Listen, oh naturally smart and wise one. Did you get where you are in life teaching yourself to read, spell, become competent at arithmetic & basic science, history? You did that all yourself, right? Just you, and a stick to scratch letters and numbers in the dirt?
No? Mama helped?
What was that? All mommy touched on was basic reading and numbers? WOW, it all clicked for you, huh? What is that, some kind of genetic knowledge trick?
Listen, it's possible. I was raised by wolves, or so my old man alleges, and they taught me:
- Spelling
- Reading
- Calculus
- Latin
- And most importantly, to always eat the liver of your prey first
Look lets deal in FACTS. 1. Teachers KNOW what they are getting into and CHOOSE to take the job and stay in it. 2. the claims of "for the children" is BS and you stated as such by the attitude "if the pay is crap why do you expect " 3. we have been throwing money at the education system for salaries and benefits for decades and NOT getting a return proportional to investment as a whole . 4. teachers pay and benefits (both in content and increases) have NOT reflected the economy as a whole and working taxpayers specifically. But the biggest elephant in the room is we hear all the time at negotiations and strike threats is "we can leave for better things if you dont pay us more". but funny thing.. teachers in mass DONT DO THAT. In fact when a school district out east called their bluff and FIRED all of them and attempted to hire more took them to court to let them strike with no risk (sadly they won). Look again teachers are worth it IF THEY DO A GOOD JOB. But its well past time for the job to be like all others that TAXPAYERS HAVE Effected by economy, judged by outcome and yes if you dont like it... LEAVE. not hold our kids hostage knowing they are secure in that if they hold out they have NOTHING TO LOOSE. scrounger
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
I love the comment "how can you expect high standards if you pay us crap" bull#.
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
JUST LIKE EVERY TAXPAYER WHO WORKS AND PAYS YOUR SALARY.
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
you dont get to do a #ty job because you feel your pay is crap.
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
in ANY OTHER FIELD you be FIRED for such a work ethic
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
so your saying your entitled as a teacher to be crappy because of your pay?
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
look if you dont like the pay and job requirements....DONT TAKE OR STAY IN THE JOB.
originally posted by: scrounger
a reply to: ApacheHelicopetr
DONT LIKE THE JOB OR PAY.... DONT WORK THERE
originally posted by: ApacheHelicopetr
a reply to: scrounger
Your the one making the emotional rants heres.
ahh so you accustation keeps stating... but instead of countering (with facts) my points to lead with this shows the counter using irrelivant comments.
And yes there is a teaching shortage.
REALLY? You may bring up ISOLATED cases but as a whole explain how at every contract time in MOST of the school districts there isnt a rash of quittings? hmmmm
Trying to find science and maths teachers is liking finding gold. Why would a science or maths grad take a 35k job when they can get twice as much elsewhere?
Your first part is true of ALL TEACHERS . But what you choose to ignore is this is CAUSED BY THE UNIONS. you know those people that FIGHT TOOTH AND NAIL the idea of MERIT pay for good teachers. so your wanting better wages under a system for ALL TEACHERS , be good, bad or lazy. As for the last part tell me why we again still see science and math teachers not quitting at contract time .
Which means many schools are having to use unqualified staff to teach those subjects.
um care to back this up? Because last I checked ALL TEACHERS have to meet minimum requirements to teach (again dictated by teachers unions). So if your getting "unqulified staff" then you need to bring a complaint to the standards boards and have them removed. not claim you want more pay.
Yes there us a flood of English and social studies teachers because they cant get jobs.
again some PROOF of this SPECIFIC accusations.
But for other subjects not so much.
The USA is sinking in education rankings for a reason.
yea they are.. but it isnt due to pay and benifits of teachers. but what you are IGNORING and trying to downplay is private , charter and home schooling educational levels is much better than public schools at times up to half the cost. seems your "more money solves all" montra is failing now isnt it Adding to it not evey other country spends more than us and getting better results.
If your not willing to pay more than you may as well accept China as the next superpower now.