It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former Democrat Claims Democrat Party Being Paid Millions by Cartels

page: 5
78
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 01:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Clinical Jealousy and how Sherlock Holmes discovered the whims of Watson 🤣





posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 01:28 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Too bad that wasn't the post you were responding to, huh?



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus




posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 01:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Chadwickus

Too bad that wasn't the post you were responding to, huh?


You’re doubling down on this?

Wow.

It’s the epitome of what I was saying, how do you not see that?



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 01:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Russians !!!!



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 02:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: MisterSpock

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

It wouldn't surprise me to find out that democrats have been colluding with criminals and foreign nationals to subvert and overthrow the US of A.



Just like in Europe and Italy with all mostly far left Politicians as well.

You mean democrats and republicans.... Right


Yup, all politicians, larger NGO's and those at the upper end of the judicial branch. All a bunch of self indulgent sellouts.

Why anyone would look at any of them with something other than an eye of scrutiny/distain is beyond me.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 02:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

No, it's just your deflection from my original point. The democrat party is almost 100% corrupt. The republican party is somewhat (maybe even mostly, it remains to be seen) corrupt. Your posting that it included some republicans isn't some sort of end all be all or the cause of any cognitive dissonance on our part. We know there are bad guy republicans.

Furthermore, the second post you linked is again not an example of anything noteworthy because as I noted above the democratic party is almost 100% corrupt. So calling out that corruption without saying anything about the republican party's corruption isn't a dismissal of the corruption of the republican party.

So by all means, if you have a point get to it. Do tell, what do you think that second post proves?



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 03:06 AM
link   
Democrats are known for being soft on crime and are the largest group known to aid and abet illegal aliens.

And they are always looking for money to give away.

What the Democrats have done to the moral fabric of the country is beyond disgusting



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 03:30 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

You could say the same about the Right, when it comes to corruptions there is no bias



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Cool story again, nothing but you passing your opinion off as fact there.

My original point still stands, this thread is aimed at dumb right wingers to get all triggered about evil dems.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 04:35 AM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

Yet he wants something which all of your beloved dem role models voted for previously and now it's different? So you admit its bad cause orange man wants it now?



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 04:41 AM
link   
a reply to: r0xor

I wanna reply to this wall of text...but it will have to happen if I remember tomorrow...just saving a spot.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 04:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

So the democrat party is not mostly corrupt? LOL, cool story. Nothing but passing your opinion off as fact.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 04:52 AM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

Except in this case the republicans are trying to get the wall and stop the illegal immigration. Well, most of them are at least. So no, you and chad are just wrong here. Now maybe in other instances you could be correct but the OP is about the southern border.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 05:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Mostly corrupt now?

Thought it was “almost 100%”?

This is deflecting from my original point that has either gone straight over your head or you’re protecting your comrade xuenchen, who is renowned for his bias, his intention is 100% anti democrat, regardless if true or not.

You pick.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 06:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

It wouldn't surprise me to find out that democrats have been colluding with criminals and foreign nationals to subvert and overthrow the US of A.



When I realized they do that, along with a core group of the R party from the established lines, I went Libertarian. Or some kind of NONE OF THE ABOVE in major elections where the asshats were on both sides. Last time it was a reluctant DJT, next time will be a sign up in my yard DJT.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 06:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: xuenchen

It wouldn't surprise me to find out that democrats have been colluding with criminals and foreign nationals to subvert and overthrow the US of A.





You mean democrats and republicans.... Right

Yes, I was beat to this thought.

Good post!



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 06:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

I seriously hope you are smarter than to think the majority of hard drugs is smuggled via backpack across the border on foot!!


I hope you understand this boils down to finding ways to slow down Jihadist, Mexican Drug lords who are murdering people like Pol Pot while paying off their President to not come for them. AND, rapist coyotes in their tasks and evil deeds?

That is not all is it? It is a start into grievous errors that have unnecessarily cost lives of more than just innocent women and children. It is dishonest to avoid these facts.



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 06:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zeropinion
Of course we won't mention slick Willy and crooked Hillary's involvement with the cartels back during the Iran Contra scandal of the eighties.


or that RINO who was on the team to kill JFK , HW Bush #41, was VP to 40 at the time. It was his scheme according to testimony at the hearings by Col Oliver North. With the CIA connections of Bush, I cannot say I disbelieved Col North.
ETA

I recall the pic floating of a very young Bush Jr sitting with Bill Clinton and Sr at a country club.
edit on 28-1-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2019 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Is almost 100%, mostly? SMDH.

100% anti-democrat is the least amount of anti-democrat that's appropriate. This is a party that celebrated the legalizing of full term abortion, in 2019. A party that rigged their own primary in 2016 (is this what these social democracies look like?). A party whose IT guys smashed hard drives of the party leadership. A party whose candidate in 2016 is an unconvicted felon and was selling her future position to the highest bidder. A party who cheated in and conspired with the media before public debates. A party who tells everyone there's no voter fraud in any sizeable amounts. A party run and backed by #metoo perps. A party who launders tax payer money back into their coffers. A party who elected an ISIS sympathizer. A party filling its ranks with avowed socialists.

So yes, they are corrupt and corrupted and if you have any red blooded american in you, you should be 100% anti-democrat at all times. Even if it's not true today, it will be in short order. You can't even parody them because they take the parody and try to make it reality.

But to address your point, again, the OP quoted that the delegation was bipartisan. Your comment was wrong and your assumption was wrong. You can admit it, it's ok.
edit on 28-1-2019 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join