Strange Area In Photograph

a reply to: wmd_2008

My point exactly, most people just are not atuned to the detail. Focus on the sea of fertility in the moon so what image for a while.

a reply to: oldcarpy

That is fair enough but hear this, there are those who just will not see.

You one of them?

a reply to: lunarrover

Yeah, that's me. Deaf as a stone, too.

I generally do not see things that are not there because, well, because they are not there.

You, on the other hand, need to book in at Specsavers.

a reply to: lunarrover

Read the replies you've been given. You'll do much better looking at the high resolution images:

www.flickr.com...

www.flickr.com...

Let's have a look at the areas you have difficulty comprehending in the two Apollo images you've posted:

If you are trying to tell us that the are on the image edge is clearer than in the centre then your pattern recognition skills are failing you.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

In a we know what you are saying is true but we are going to jump up and down anyway rebuke.

Buddy never will I believe that this is not real. This is significant and proves image manipulation to obscure the images and it is used to mask the truth.

a reply to: oldcarpy

The only thing that can erase this is a trip to MK Ultra.

a reply to: lunarrover

Buddy never will I believe that this is not real.

Yes, I noticed that.

Much stranger things seen with UFOs and impossible heavy rocks and stones down here on Earth that are seen much more clearly that is a huge mystery and some obvious lies from certain parts of mainly the U.S.government.Also far to many alien abduction cases from very credible people.I cannot see anything in this picture but craters and various shapes of rocks because it is to blurry.The image is not sharp enough.

a reply to: Jobeycool

That is the problem we all have and the reason it is not sharp enough is simple......


Disney-Frost

a reply to: lunarrover

"Disney Frost" is a made up thing and makes you sound like a prize tw@t.

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: oldcarpy

The only thing that can erase this is a trip to MK Ultra.

Really? Thanks for that - top tip.

a reply to: oldcarpy

The reason for that is because that is the technique they used to fake images they had layons of landers and rovers just like disney used to make cartoons. That is why images exist with the cross hairs that are behind rovers etc. And they used a frosted pane to hide detail. If that makes me sound like a prize twat then so be it that is not the issue.

Did they take pics of nasa people and lems etc at area 51. Send up an orbiter to take pictures of the moon then ploy cartoonists to do the layons and fake the nasa version sold to the public.

It is a busted flush!

omg its falling appart...

They probably did the layovers and then took the photos which would then be scanned.

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: oldcarpy
If that makes me sound like a prize twat then so be it.

...and we're done here.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

That's it buddy insult away.

You know I'm right don't you, that is why you are so aggressive and choose to insult me.

Well I am taking this info and I am going to push it all over the web. forget the structures and aliens for now it is the layovers from here on in.

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: oldcarpy

That is why images exist with the cross hairs that are behind rovers etc.

That statement alone shows you NOTHING about photography/digital images

Scroll down on link till you see crosshair images Debunked

Now anyone with your claimed background would know about this problem.

a reply to: wmd_2008

Freedom to say stuff means nothing without any semblance of evidence, at least the frosted layovers are obvious to see as are images where shadows are all wrong etc. they used the state of the art techniques of the day and that is how they did it just the waty Disney taught them.

Deffo sh1thouse trickery was used.

Everyone I have shown this to agrees that there is an edge where clear detail can be seen then the frosted layover can be seen in many images, so anyways we can keep going until blue in the face.

originally posted by: lunarrover
Shame they did not mention the frosting pane, but then why would they.

Why would they mention something that exists only in your head?

If they wanted to hide any thing on those photos they would be able to do it and nobody would notice a thing. I'm not a professional and completely changed a photo in a way that was not noticeable.

I think I read their fanciful explanations about scanning on their site.

What's fanciful about it?