Some algebraic Division

Heres an thought I hear quite often both on and off ats.

Calling out division leads to division.

So lets throw out some x's and y's and suss this out.



X says Y is causing division in society by Y calling out Z for causing division in society.



Now why cant A come along and say actually X is causing division in society by X calling out Y for causing division in society?



But wait!!!!!


Couldnt B then call out A for the same?

And who is to say that Z cant then blame X, Y, A, or B causing division by calling out people causing division?





So put into real terms, if someone makes a thread or video calling out the media or a politician or some other group for being inaccurate or acting poorly to perhaps maintain power by dividing people, I dont think that person is causing division so long as their post is accurate.


But if you do feel that way, then perhaps the next fellow or lass to come along may use your same argument against you, and say actually it is you who are causing division by calling out the orginal person who made the thread.







I suck at algebra. But I am pretty good at long division.

a reply to: Grambler

As long as those libtards continue with the name calling; it's only going to get worser.

a reply to: Grambler

You're about 6 threads away from starting a full-blown civil war.

a reply to: Grambler

The problem is when the division you call out is long planned and arranged by group C and M who do that because they follow some twisted ideology in which it is better to keep R divided from L instead of calling out and overcoming P.
You keep playing as expected. Because the real issue is not L or R but C, P and M, which come out of every fight between L & R as winner because they have the resources and infrastructure.
If you feel like you're just an individual A and you're only critisising B as private person think again, because you are pointing fingers at whatever group you feel B is a part of. So you left the realm of individual and keep playing along the lines of L& R as C, M & P want you to.

originally posted by: olaru12


libtards
name calling;

thats a great response

a reply to: Peeple

Your a fun X!

originally posted by: TinySickTears

originally posted by: olaru12


libtards
name calling;

thats a great response

I think it was sarcasm, though who knows at this point

a reply to: Grambler
Sounds like you're describing the ongoing battle of globalists against nationalists, if habla some spanish this video is gooood..... www.adn40.mx...#

a reply to: Grambler

I suck at algebra. But I am pretty good at long division.

Good at Long division? you sir are a liar! (just kidding, bad 4th grade flashbacks entered my mind)

I enjoy a good post like this, it's thought provoking. It's not this 'Hillary did this! BURN HER AT THE STAKE! or 'Trump had a shot of vodka-COLLUSION!'

I like posting thought provoking threads that require a question that needs answering-and I enjoy seeing the results. Nothing is better than the things that make you go hmmmmmm.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Grambler

The problem is when the division you call out is long planned and arranged by group C and M who do that because they follow some twisted ideology in which it is better to keep R divided from L instead of calling out and overcoming P.
You keep playing as expected. Because the real issue is not L or R but C, P and M, which come out of every fight between L & R as winner because they have the resources and infrastructure.
If you feel like you're just an individual A and you're only critisising B as private person think again, because you are pointing fingers at whatever group you feel B is a part of. So you left the realm of individual and keep playing along the lines of L& R as C, M & P want you to.

C and M are ok, but F P. /s

Somehow I thought there would be an R or two in that statement (which I do agree with).

It's the P s you need to watch your back with maybe the L z if you are a lady

Always make sure you are dotting the I's and crossing the Ts. That helps ... somehow.

Despite being great friends with all the letters, I never really got to know Y.

a reply to: Grambler

Division is the key.

If you can divide X,Y,Z,A,B,C and so on into parts of the whole, they/the system/them/powers that be/NWO etc, wins.

a reply to: Grambler

I can't have my pi, and eat it too... Oh well...

If 3A's plus 1 get divided by every time A is at odds with B, we will always be left with one truth.

But seriously, you nailed why I don't both with politics any more, I can't seem to miss everyone's toes and some one gets triggered and says I am a communist/Nazi/libtard/hatemonger/crackpot/leftist/xenophobe.

The declaration: "There is division." removes bias from the perspective. This statement refrains from placing blame on any particular group, while objectively considering the situation.

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Grambler

As long as those libtards continue with the name calling; it's only going to get worser.

Too funny