It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Clinton machine flooded the FBI with Trump-Russia dirt

page: 1
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+4 more 
posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 08:51 PM
link   

Interesting view on how the Clinton Campaign kept feeding BS to the FBI until they bit the hook right off the fishing line.

Seems all this BS about Russia and Trump is just crap they dreamed up during the failed 2016 Campaign.

Not surprised because by now we all know Hillary Inc. was a scam 😎

Democrats stay in their DEMented state anyway 🤣

Note: this is an opinion of one author at The Hill so the actual BS going on might be much worse and devastating.

Any Means Necessary


How the Clinton machine flooded the FBI with Trump-Russia dirt … until agents bit

When at first you don’t succeed, try, try again. That’s what Hillary Clinton’s machine did in 2016, eventually getting the FBI to bite on an uncorroborated narrative that Donald Trump and Russia were trying to hijack the presidential election.

Between July and October 2016, Clinton-connected lawyers, emissaries and apologists made more than a half-dozen overtures to U.S. officials, each tapping a political connection to get suspect evidence into FBI counterintelligence agents’ hands, according to internal documents and testimonies I reviewed and interviews I conducted.

In each situation, the overture was uninvited. And as the election drew closer, the point of contact moved higher up the FBI chain.


actual photo of a common DNC bait tool...




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 08:57 PM
link   
Another Clinton bashing thread? Just because she was baiting the hook with suckers doesn't mean she is legally accountable for someone taking the bait. She is a lawyer, and the ex-presidents old lady, nothing will come of this. She is not touchable under present policy.


+9 more 
posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
Another Clinton bashing thread? Just because she was baiting the hook with suckers doesn't mean she is legally accountable for someone taking the bait. She is a lawyer, and the ex-presidents old lady, nothing will come of this. She is not touchable under present policy.


If you point out that someone did something wrong and they are on the left, it is bashing.

If you point out that someone did something (according to unnamed sources) and they are on the right, it is justice.

That's just how America works now.




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm disappointed Xue.

Out of all the 'DNC bait tool(s)' that you could have posted, you chose a lure.




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:32 PM
link   
a reply to: rickymouse

So I am assuming that you think dirty Clinton and her goons shouldn’t be bashed for making sh!t up trying to steal an election?
I will give them a little credit for realizing she was a useless candidate that needed all the help she could get to win.
The Democrat MO is lie, cheat and steal.....but she still lost.
That really says a lot about the Dirty Dems.



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: xuenchen

I'm disappointed Xue.

Out of all the 'DNC bait tool(s)' that you could have posted, you chose a lure.



Good point... I'll help.



EBT card...

THERE is the preferred bait.




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:35 PM
link   
Great article.

Worth a read and further shows how the FBI was just the investigative tool for the dems and hillary.

It ends with this.


The political pressure from Team Clinton had come from many directions: State, Congress, Justice, a top Democratic lawyer.

Yet, no one in the FBI seemed to tap the brakes, noticing the obvious: Its counterintelligence apparatus was being weaponized with political opposition research from one campaign against its rival.

Leaking. Politically motivated evidence. Ex parte contacts outside the normal FBI evidence-gathering chain.

None of it seemed to raise a red flag.

That is a troubling legacy.


Thats an understatement.



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

I thought it would be the seemingly ethnic names that match up to only white faces.




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Lumenari

I thought it would be the seemingly ethnic names that match up to only white faces.



Nah... that's Texas politics now. Or just red state Democratic politics.

Take Occasional-Cortex... she is the new face of a party that wouldn't have let her in 30 years ago because she's Latino.

Times are changing...




edit on 22-1-2019 by Lumenari because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Lumenari

The same party that wouldn't allow socialists?

Interesting.



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

youtube time 😎



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Lumenari

The same party that wouldn't allow socialists?

Interesting.


I'm sorry... I have to stop posting because of thread drift... I had a nightmare the other night that I woke up with a Gadson flag tattoo on the back of my neck...

On TOPIC!

You do have to wonder exactly how far this is going to unwind?

You have the Clinton Crime family, arguably the most corrupt part of the political Progressive movement ever seen in our country.

Then you have... not a lot on the other side of the equation besides actual justice.

The actual biggest criminals in history politically have always skated out of it.

I honestly at this point don't see an accounting happening.

However, if it doesn't does it finally push this country out of our current soft civil war into something bigger?

I don't think the Clintons will be the catalyst, quite frankly because everyone KNOWS that they are corrupt and the left is just fine with that.

So something bigger has to happen for them to ever see a real court room.

We shall see....




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 09:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Grambler

youtube time 😎


Hahaha!

Tomorrow perhaps.

Im afraid its about bed time for this fat guy



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Grambler

youtube time 😎


Hahaha!

Tomorrow perhaps.

Im afraid its about bed time for this fat guy


Odd... we call that fun-sized...




posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I thought the FBI was supposed to investigate potential wrongdoing at a national level?

Then, when they have strong enough evidence to make a case, it goes to court to be tried and the accused are either acquitted or convicted.

If the evidence is not strong enough, it doesn't go to court.

Even if the evidence is strong, but the court rules to acquit, the accused does not get prosecuted and cannot be re-tried on the basis of the same evidence and accusations because of legislation to prevent double-jeopardy (i.e: you can't keep rehashing the same dead accusations, which would be vexatious litigation).

Of course, there is nothing to stop the general public from flogging dead horses (who was Hillary? Some old lady?).


edit on 22/1/2019 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

The FBI was heavily infested with Obama/Clinton/NWO BS "at the time" and still is.

😬



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:06 PM
link   
Someone in Congress is leaking info big time, ever since the Dims took over the House.



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler


I don't know. Do you buy that everybody was that effing stupid? Sure, maybe a bunch of them. But all of them? Nah. If these allegations are true, at least some had to be complicit.
edit on 22-1-2019 by Quetzalcoatl14 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: rickymouse

So I am assuming that you think dirty Clinton and her goons shouldn’t be bashed for making sh!t up trying to steal an election?
I will give them a little credit for realizing she was a useless candidate that needed all the help she could get to win.
The Democrat MO is lie, cheat and steal.....but she still lost.
That really says a lot about the Dirty Dems.


Oh, I think that Hillary should be charged with a crime, I just know that it will not happen. Bashing Clinton does no good, she lost and I am glad she is not our president. I am never going to vote Democrat for president again because of her.



posted on Jan, 22 2019 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: chr0naut

The FBI was heavily infested with Obama/Clinton/NWO BS "at the time" and still is.

😬


Well, the FBI are a government run agency. I suppose they should be well invested in the government of the time and should still be invested in the government that is current (note: the government is more than just the POTUS).



new topics

top topics



 
23
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join