It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Democrat Rep Wants To Ban Teens From Wearing MAGA Hats

page: 4
32
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2019 @ 05:20 PM
link   
a reply to: StallionDuck

They were Deemed Verboten by the Powers that Be in the Liberal State . Dissent was not Condoned , but they seemed to Forget about the Bill of Rights in their Reasoning ....




posted on Jan, 30 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Seriously? Wolf shirts? lol

Man... I'm glad I don't live in that part of the world. Can't believe people are just that damn stupid.

...and we give them driver's licenses and power over us to make laws for us.


just wow!



posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 08:56 PM
link   
March 13, 2019

Snowflake sees MAGA hat in car. Slashes car's tires.

bigleaguepolitics.com...




posted on Mar, 13 2019 @ 09:01 PM
link   
How is this any different than say the states, that are under Republican control, that wants to ban sagging pants?

Why is this wrong, but right for the pants?

Personally I think it is a bad idea and would violate the 1st amendment.

It is what I have maintained, that once a legal door is opened one can not just cry foul when it is abused, and this is clearly the case that is here.



posted on Mar, 14 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: sdcigarpig
How is this any different than say the states, that are under Republican control, that wants to ban sagging pants?

Why is this wrong, but right for the pants?

Personally I think it is a bad idea and would violate the 1st amendment.

It is what I have maintained, that once a legal door is opened one can not just cry foul when it is abused, and this is clearly the case that is here.

It’s just the republican states that want to ban sagging pants? So you admit basic decency is partisan? Keeping your private areas private should not even be brought into discussion. We already have laws against indecent exposure. What purpose do the pants serve if I can see your whole ass? People that wear their pants like that look like ignorant bitches. I get it, it’s counter-culture. It’s also tasteless and dumb as hell



posted on Mar, 14 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   

edit on 14-3-2019 by Guiltyguitarist because: Duplicate



posted on Mar, 14 2019 @ 10:31 AM
link   

edit on 14-3-2019 by Guiltyguitarist because: Duplicate



posted on Mar, 14 2019 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: sdcigarpig


Why is this wrong, but right for the pants?

Personally I think it is a bad idea and would violate the 1st amendment.



Brain development starts out very concrete. At a certain age of adolescence it discovers abstract thought. Then some brains mature even further and are able to appreciate the concrete and the abstract. I find liberal minded individuals are stuck in the abstract way of thinking.
A hat covering your head does not equal pants that do not cover your ass.
Your first amendment right ends where my rights begin.
I have the right to not be forced to look at your ass. It is indecent exposure.



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join