It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: dawnstar
I've heard that there is still plenty of money being held for fencing and stuff that hasn't been touched. is this true??? and if so, why hasn't it been? is it because the construction of the wall, fence, or heck, let's just call it peaches..is it being held up because of the legal aspect of land seizure.
Imminent domain cases can take 10 years in the courts. trump knows this, his wall is just symbolic to keep his base riled up. Brilliant politics actually.
And the "Mexicans will pay for it" was classic.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: face23785
So they want to reopen the government and then negotiate on the wall , but you just don't believe them.
originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: Guyfriday
1898, during the Spanish-American War, with full blessing of Congress. And Teddy was a former Assistant Secretary of the Navy. So close, but not the same as Trump calling up the III% or the Oath Keepers.
originally posted by: Cutepants
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
What is the great offer supposed to be? Three years extended protection for DACA recipients? Trump is bluffing, he doesn't actually want to deport those people. He is offering something that he has to give anyway. It's no good deal.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Cutepants
the DACA kids are not getting deported in any case. It would be a PR disaster for the right.
If that's true why would anyone be upset with the dems for not accepting a meaningless offer?
Wouldn't trump look like a fool for offering something to the dems that everyone knows they already have?
Yeah I'm sure the immigrants that confronted Pelosi last year are so relieved by the predictions of some goon on AboveTopSecret.com.
They just got offered a legally binding solution and it was rejected by Nancy Pelosi. End of story.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: dawnstar
I've heard that there is still plenty of money being held for fencing and stuff that hasn't been touched. is this true??? and if so, why hasn't it been? is it because the construction of the wall, fence, or heck, let's just call it peaches..is it being held up because of the legal aspect of land seizure.
Imminent domain cases can take 10 years in the courts. trump knows this, his wall is just symbolic to keep his base riled up. Brilliant politics actually.
And the "Mexicans will pay for it" was classic.
I'm pretty sure I'm that if it is for "National Security Issues " they can do it immediately even if there is a court case. Prove me wrong.
But let's be honest, your opposition to the Wall isn't built on claims of eminent domain, is it?
Details please on how each Bill presented by the House is an evolution in their offer towards reaching a compromise.
The big thing that the house is offering to do is pass bills that pay the workers and families and then continue to negotiate the wall.
originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: scraedtosleep
Sorry if I'm skeptical of people professing to know what the opossing side wants.
originally posted by: jimmyx
trump said mexico will pay for his wall, so why should the American taxpayer fund it?.....this has nothing to do with democrats.....where's McConnell of the senate?...apparently just another wussy for trump, who won't take responsibility.
hey here's an idea for republicans...why don't you elect someone that's smart, has critical thinking skills, and wants to help EVERY American get ahead....nah....republican voters don't like those types of leaders.
just think...if pence gets into office we'll have our first opus dei, mr. clean as the POTUS