Originally posted by Ryanp5555
So again, where is the proof that i am wrong?
**You can become infected with an STD Without Ever Having Sex
Once that is understood as fact your case is weak, if not dead.
Just because certain Diseases are labeled as "Sexually Transmitted Diseases" doesn't mean that is the only
method of which they can spread
to other hosts.
Your case rests on two things:
Sexually Transmitted Diseases.
a.) You get them from multiple partners, from sleeping around, thus proving it was not meant to be...
Since it is also possible to become infected without Sexual Contact, your first statement doesn't hold up as proof of concept. It isn't completely
incorrect, simply incomplete. Multiple Partners only increases you chances of infection through sexual contact. However, if infection is still
possible with "Zero" Partners, your theory about having only "One" partner is invalid.
b.) ...if it was there would be no reprocrussions for it, but there is.
Since it is possible to have Multiple Sexual Partners without infection, your second claim is also not valid. Once again, you're talking about
"Percentages" or "Probabilites" but claiming that your data is "Absolute" which it is not.
~Joe has Multiple Sexual Partners yet always practices "Safe or Protected Sex".
~Mike has just One Partner and never uses any Protection.
~Steve has never had Sex and considers Protection the least of his worries.
Now, the "Probability" for all 3 of these men will most likely vary from one another but more importantly, not one of them would have a "Zero"
probability for becoming infected with an STD. Plus the fact that Mike, a Virgin of any Sexual Contact, may actually have a higher "Probability" of
infection based on other factors, Proves you are wrong in your claim.
At best your claim is an incorrect assumption based upon poor reasoning. At worst it's a pathetic attempt at both Medical & Religious Propaganda,
not to mention weak philosophy.