It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING : Mueller team disputes BuzzFeed article today

page: 3
75
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: JinMI

Don't need to try again, when Mueller is going after Trump, he needs to resign, when he debunks buzzfeed, he's alright!



Now lets get this straight, the News Agency retracted the lie about a lie. THAT is the story.
edit on 18-1-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Broken heart?

Pft, might carry some credibility if I was carrying on about the buzzfeed story. But guess what.. I haven't said anything about it till now. I couldn't give a rat's if it's true or not.

In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners


edit on 18/1/19 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)


+9 more 
posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Depends on who you ask.

When he debunks Buzzfeed, he does everyone a service, regardless of where you stand on the issue.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus


In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners


50% of the country are bandwagoners, anti Trump and pro Trump.

Then there are the independents who shoot the fish from both barrels.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:05 PM
link   
Quite clearly I've hit a nerve.


Awwww Poor babies, the cognitive dissonance must hurt your little brains





posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Chadwickus

Depends on who you ask.

When he debunks Buzzfeed, he does everyone a service, regardless of where you stand on the issue.


That's the long and short of it. The lack of accuracy in the media is everyone's problem.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: xuenchen

Broken heart?

Pft, might carry some credibility if I was carrying on about the buzzfeed story. But guess what.. I haven't said anything about it till now. I couldn't give a rat's if it's true or not.

In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners



It is chaddish of you to think that the news org volunteering to be taking it back is about Mueller but NOT about the truth.

ETA

My facts were mixed up Chad so I retract the media outlet volunteering part of this and apologize as you R right.

STILL you are flippant about the truth as usual was my intent.
edit on 18-1-2019 by Justoneman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:07 PM
link   
You know I often say when it comes to this investigation is that the best we can do I await it’s final findings and take it from there. There is just too much speculation and this proves just that.

I really think both sides have to calm down and just wait on the report and stop making assumptions or writing articles like buzfeed did.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: xuenchen

Broken heart?

Pft, might carry some credibility if I was carrying on about the buzzfeed story. But guess what.. I haven't said anything about it till now. I couldn't give a rat's if it's true or not.

In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners



It is chaddish of you to think that the news org volunteering to be taking it back is about Mueller but NOT about the truth.


Last I saw Buzzfeed said they "stand by their reporting". Do you have an update?



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
You know I often say when it comes to this investigation is that the best we can do I await it’s final findings and take it from there. There is just too much speculation and this proves just that.

I really think both sides have to calm down and just wait on the report and stop making assumptions or writing articles like buzfeed did.


For once we are in agreement.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
Quite clearly I've hit a nerve.
Awwww Poor babies, the cognitive dissonance must hurt your little brains


My brain is so wee, I don't know what "cognitive dissonance" is, and have no desire to look it up.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Chadwickus
Quite clearly I've hit a nerve.
Awwww Poor babies, the cognitive dissonance must hurt your little brains


My brain is so wee, I don't know what "cognitive dissonance" is, and have no desire to look it up.


It means he's disappointed this story wasn't true so he's trolling to lift his spirits.
edit on 18 1 19 by face23785 because: Who the hell says "brighten their spirits"?


+1 more 
posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:11 PM
link   
This, my leftist friends, is why I TRY to not comment on things until they work themselves out.

But here we are.

How many times does this have to happen to you before you figure out what's going on?



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
Quite clearly I've hit a nerve.


Awwww Poor babies, the cognitive dissonance must hurt your little brains






Yea, that's it.....



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Chadwickus
Quite clearly I've hit a nerve.
Awwww Poor babies, the cognitive dissonance must hurt your little brains


My brain is so wee, I don't know what "cognitive dissonance" is, and have no desire to look it up.


It really is something I think you specifically might want to look in to....



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

2019 just keeps on gifting.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: xuenchen

Broken heart?

Pft, might carry some credibility if I was carrying on about the buzzfeed story. But guess what.. I haven't said anything about it till now. I couldn't give a rat's if it's true or not.

In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners



It is chaddish of you to think that the news org volunteering to be taking it back is about Mueller but NOT about the truth.


Last I saw Buzzfeed said they "stand by their reporting". Do you have an update?


You know old chap, you are RIGHT, I am WRONG.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Chadwickus

Depends on who you ask.

When he debunks Buzzfeed, he does everyone a service, regardless of where you stand on the issue.


That's the long and short of it. The lack of accuracy in the media is everyone's problem.


Curveball: What if his office made a statement to protect their investigation? Is there a statute that even applies?

One that holds them to truthfully address the public?



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: xuenchen

Broken heart?

Pft, might carry some credibility if I was carrying on about the buzzfeed story. But guess what.. I haven't said anything about it till now. I couldn't give a rat's if it's true or not.

In just concerned about the flippancy of you bandwagoners



It is chaddish of you to think that the news org volunteering to be taking it back is about Mueller but NOT about the truth.


Last I saw Buzzfeed said they "stand by their reporting". Do you have an update?


You know old chap, you are RIGHT, I am WRONG.


At least you can acknowledge that and aren't standing by your sources in the face of them being factually inaccurate.
That makes you a better journalist than they have.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 08:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Chadwickus

Depends on who you ask.

When he debunks Buzzfeed, he does everyone a service, regardless of where you stand on the issue.


That's the long and short of it. The lack of accuracy in the media is everyone's problem.


Curveball: What if his office made a statement to protect their investigation? Is there a statute that even applies?

One that holds them to truthfully address the public?


What if the spokesman was drunk when they put out the statement?

We can what-if all day. Right now, the story is false.

ETA: While we're at it, what if you owe me $10,000?
edit on 18 1 19 by face23785 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
75
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join