a reply to: AgarthaSeed
I think Roger Stone just tried to make it seem as if he had insider Wikileaks info during 2016.
He is being charged with lying to congress, I have read, as well as trying to compromise other witnesses. I believe by asking them to say he had
insider info, he didn't.
Stone has always wanted the self promotion.
One can see he plainly is loving this attention.
Now he can do interviews, write a book and who knows what else.
Mueller has never spoken with Assange because he knows , full well, if he does Assange will testify it was Seth Rich, not Russia, who provided the
This will lead back to Democrats.
I don't think Wikileaks is compromised.
I just think it isn't Assange running right now and nobody can run it the same.
If they were comorimised his whole close team in the world and family would be screaming.
It's his baby, he wouldn't let it stand.
In my opinion.
The several Tweets assange OR wikileaks from both Wikileaks and Assange Defence turned out to be a common search error.
Wikileaks actually responded to me in a tweet where I asked them to address it.
Boolean search method
Many people take examples of Wikileaks saying things they feel are "off message" and then call it "compromised".
People forget Wikileaks has never been about picking sides. They are going to report it all if it's there to report.
Assange being silenced has actually worked in Trump's favour because if he had his voice it's highly unlikely that voice would have been entirely
supportive of Trump and the current US government.
I think if he had been speaking out it might have been far worse than Wikileaks.
His silence is probably helpful to him keeping some Trump supporters behind him.
If he is just reporting facts I think this is exactly what we should all want regardless of what reports say , truth is good.