TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

That is why it has to be submitted by the offender.

You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?
watergate.info...

Pardons have to be submitted to a court by the offender. It can be done before during or after a trial.

The actual text in the pardon is meaningless as long it says someone is pardoned.

The pardoner could say the reason is because they like the way the pardoned plays with cat turds and it would have no bearing on anything.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Pardons have to be submitted to a court by the offender.

That makes no sense. On any level.

New Q

2913

Presidents also may issue pre-emptive pardons -- or rather, a pardon for any crimes an individual may have committed or may have been charged with. For example, President Gerald Ford issued a pardon to outgoing President Richard Nixon even though Nixon had not been charged with any federal crimes at that point.

However, crimes committed after the pardon is issued are not excused.
Litigation.findlaw

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

Pardons have to be submitted to a court by the offender.

That makes no sense. On any level.

Well i am not alone responsible for governmental nonsense. Tell it to the judge.

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

A pardon allows a person to be absolved of guilt by definition.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New Q

2913

Code 3:42 😎

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

The court has nothing to do with the process and all the president has to do is say "You're pardoned." Just like Ford did.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New Q

2913

Code 3:42 😎

18 days until April. March 13 or 14 depending on how it is interpreted.

a reply to: pteridine

15th would have been more fun.

nvm

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

The court has nothing to do with the process and all the president has to do is say "You're pardoned." Just like Ford did.

lol

#magikwords

You should really think before you post.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
Yes, it can happen and there is little to nothing they can do about it. Given the type of board it is I seriously doubt they even care.

That was the point, which means 3 different ID’s used in the same Bread by Q is insignificant and not real tests.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

You shouldn't speak authoritatively when you don't know what you're talking about.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

The court has nothing to do with the process and all the president has to do is say "You're pardoned." Just like Ford did.

There could be another wrinkle for the SCOTUS to ponder. If Obama is convicted of Treason, can they retroactively invalidate any pardons granted to a co-conspirator? I don't think that there is a way to predict this but it will be interesting to see the legal contortionists figure it out.

a reply to: pteridine

"will be?"

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

You shouldn't speak authoritatively when you don't know what you're talking about.

The potus can not speak things into existence and no such actions by government exist where they are not backed up with a paper trail. You know this as well as i do.

#opensaysme

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

The court has nothing to do with the process and all the president has to do is say "You're pardoned." Just like Ford did.

lol

#magikwords

You should really think before you post.

Well, Phage is correct.... so I would bet that he thought before he posted.

originally posted by: SKEPTEK
New Q

2913

Time 3:42

Q Post # 342 = End is near. Q

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

You know. It's really easy to not put your foot in your mouth (repeatedly). Especially if you bother to look at links when they are provided for you.

Although there are formal procedures and guidelines in place for a presidential pardon or commutation, the President is not bound by these rules and may issue clemency in accordance with the powers granted by the Constitution.

litigation.findlaw.com...

I'll leave it to you to find out what the Constitution says about it.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

A pardon is issued to a person or their representative and then they submit it to a court in person or on the persons behalf and that in itself is a form of admitting guilt even if the person is innocent.

The court has nothing to do with the process and all the president has to do is say "You're pardoned." Just like Ford did.

lol

#magikwords

You should really think before you post.

Well, Phage is correct.... so I would bet that he thought before he posted.

So you believe potus has majik powers also?

That is interesting.

Too bad the law does not agree with you two.

I will say this though the potus pen is pretty magical and is used for much.