It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

page: 249
150
<< 246  247  248    250  251  252 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
Mueller wrapping up next week per CNN.


We are officially enroute over target.

Time to get the Kraken ready!

For sure. Once that report hits Barr's desk, there's nothing to stop them unsealing the indictments against Comey, McCabe, Brennan, and all the other players in FISAgate. Claims of "obstruction of justice" will no longer be relevant.




posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: SamSmith85
a reply to: DantesPeak

What is interesting about it? Why the obsession with a new account posting?

Find whatever means you need to belittle or dismiss alternate viewpoints, its says more about your insecurities about Q.

Can someone confirm if Q posting an anons post is confirmation or not? Or does it vary on each one depending on the result?


Obsession? 1 post is an obsession?

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

I hate the smell of disinformation in the morning.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: SamSmith85

It is a confirmation, unless it doesn't happen, then Q never really said it was going to happen, it was just us speculating.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:30 PM
link   
Is George Bush still running the show from the grave?

In his final days did he set up the don by inserting barr to go undercover and get the don on tape obstructing justice among other things?



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:31 PM
link   
Is George Bush still running the show from the grave?

In his final days did he set up the don by inserting barr to go undercover and get the don on tape obstructing justice among other things?

perhaps that letter some got at the funeral said....watch this stuff i do when i'm gone.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SKEPTEK

Re: www.cnn.com...

The CNN report says, "as early as next week". If Mueller finished/reported 2 years from now, that CNN statement would still be true. Slimy bastards run CNN.


We'll get a better idea by the weekend I'm sure. Other media outlets will jump all over this if it's true.


Everyone seems to think that Mueller's investigation is over and will find a no bill for President Trump.

I'm going to go on record and say that Mueller's first statement will be "We didn't find any wrong doing by President Trump attributable to the Russian Collusion charges nor any evidence for the same. We found this in the first few minutes of the investigation. Then, we focused on the people and agencies making the blatantly false accusations. Next week there will be subpoenas for people in the FBI, DOJ, DNC, Clinton Foundation and those in the media who have aided and abetted the false accusations against President Trump. Our findings, evidence and subpoenas have been forwarded to AG Barr and IG Horowitz."

Fingers crossed...



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:39 PM
link   
POST REMOVED BY STAFF


edit on Wed Feb 20 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: DantesPeak

originally posted by: SamSmith85
a reply to: DantesPeak

What is interesting about it? Why the obsession with a new account posting?

Find whatever means you need to belittle or dismiss alternate viewpoints, its says more about your insecurities about Q.

Can someone confirm if Q posting an anons post is confirmation or not? Or does it vary on each one depending on the result?


Obsession? 1 post is an obsession?

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

I hate the smell of disinformation in the morning.


Do me a quick favour. Link me to the last time you posted something in this thread or any Q thread that wasn't spam.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   
www.cbsnews.com...



"In compliance with the FDA announcement issued February 19, 2019, we have ceased patient treatments," the company's posted on its website within hours of the agency's statement.




Founded in 2016 by Stanford Medical School graduate Jesse Karmazin, starting last fall Ambrosia offered intravenous infusions of plasma from donors aged 16 to 25. Customers could purchase one liter of the blood for $8,000 or two liters for $12,000. Patients could book an appointment in one of five cities and pay for the service online.


Haven’t seen it discussed through all the bickering. Who are all these people and what did you do with the regulars????
edit on 20-2-2019 by SouthernGift because: Added a quote



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

But, Q didn't "say" anything in that post that you gave.

And, all Q said in 2791 is: "Interesting this leaked already".


Read between the lines. Learn the comms. Understand when Q "says" something or when it's an Anon saying it. Too many people are conflating the two.

ETA: Oh...and pay attention to times and dates.


edit on 20-2-2019 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

edit on 20-2-2019 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Must be over the target. I've never seen this many users online. It's often ~100k less.




posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:48 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

You don't know the comms. Q doesn't confirm the comms for exactly that purpose.

What you meant to say is, "learn how I interpret the comms".

Or link to the where its explained how to interpret the comms. The same way you'll make others source their claims.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
Must be over the target. I've never seen this many users online. It's often ~100k less.





Why do you think this means your "Over target" more so than all the other times that phrase has been used?

You think more people reading Q drops mean something big is about to happen? Not sure why.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Ok, not his words, but he is acknowledging a post with false information and not correcting.

That has nothing to do with reading between the lines or comms.
edit on 20-2-2019 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   
New Qs.

qmap.pub...



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: SamSmith85

You're a distraction. But, Q says there is a place for everyone. The trick is determining who is a shill and who is really making the effort to understand the comms.

Those that have followed closely since the beginning have a pretty good grasp of the comms. We're still learning and nobody gets it right 100% of the time. Many times Q appears and makes corrections, but if you follow the drops, and stay focused on the Big Picture as you research research research, you see it and understand it on a level that''s very difficult to explain. Each person must think for themselves.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:09 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

There are no "coms" though, they were all created by followers, none of it has been "confirmed" by "q" all the codes, and clocks, and time/dates etc were all created by other people to fit their narrative



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: SamSmith85

Again twisting meaning I never said and pushing your own narrative which you are undoubtedly clueless on the meaning and is pointless and laughable to pursue on this thread.



posted on Feb, 20 2019 @ 02:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: SamSmith85

You're a distraction. But, Q says there is a place for everyone. The trick is determining who is a shill and who is really making the effort to understand the comms.

Those that have followed closely since the beginning have a pretty good grasp of the comms. We're still learning and nobody gets it right 100% of the time. Many times Q appears and makes corrections, but if you follow the drops, and stay focused on the Big Picture as you research research research, you see it and understand it on a level that''s very difficult to explain. Each person must think for themselves.




So if your not someone whose been part of the clique from the start you can dismiss it by saying "learn their comms".

Nice way to deny ignorance.

You have no way of knowing if you have a "good grasp".




top topics



 
150
<< 246  247  248    250  251  252 >>

log in

join