TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

Q 2794

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f40549 No.5247957 📁
Feb 18 2019 15:56:17 (EST) NEW

Anonymous ID: 6d899e No.5247847 📁
Feb 18 2019 15:51:49 (EST)
LondonLP.png

>>5247821
This was a great proof.
Anons are MONTHS ahead of the news!

>>5247847
The Corinthia Hotel.
Q

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

How are they the same though?

Weaponizing of a government department to unseat elected officials. You asked for an example of that, not whether they paid a third party or used crowd-sourcing.

One is legal, one is not.

One side committed crimes they were accused of. The other did not.

It's not "weaponizing" agencies to depend on them to do their jobs and uphold law and order.

a reply to: tiredoflooking

While being interviewed JS pointed out a surveillance cam to police, who found it suspicious.

The camera was pointing the wrong way, how could that not be obvious...?

He preselected the location.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I posted 3 posts ago use the space for 2794...just up

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
One is legal, one is not.

One side committed crimes they were accused of. The other did not.

It's not "weaponizing" agencies to depend on them to do their jobs and uphold law and order.

That is just you bias showing.

You asked for an example of political bias in a governmental body's agenda and I gave one. You being ok because you think the receiving party is guilty and the legality of it doesn't change the underlying political bias.

a reply to: dashen

How when Carter Page was no longer part of the campaign when they got the FISA warrant on him?

It doesn't add up.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Umbrella surveillance

a reply to: Sabrechucker

The Corinthia Hotel.
We can rent out their Event Hall

a reply to: Sabrechucker

I'll need that drink if he shows up.

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
One is legal, one is not.

One side committed crimes they were accused of. The other did not.

It's not "weaponizing" agencies to depend on them to do their jobs and uphold law and order.

That is just you bias showing.

You asked for an example of political bias in a governmental body's agenda and I gave one. You being ok because you think the receiving party is guilty and the legality of it doesn't change the underlying political bias.

Easy cowboy. Don't put words in my mouth.

I asked for an example of an attempted coup, not an example of political bias, which is the crux of the matter. Nobody denies political biases exist. But THIS specific example ( the dossier, FISA, Russia, etc. ) is unprecedented.

Thank you for helping me prove my point.

a reply to: dashen

I am in. I am sure Rel knows a guy

Q 2975

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f40549 No.5248313 📁
Feb 18 2019 16:10:02 (EST)

Anonymous ID: f2434d No.5247912 📁
Feb 18 2019 15:54:53 (EST)
>>5247821

They are getting super desperate.

>>5247912
www.newsguardtech.com...📁
Yes, they are.
Q

2796
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
18 Feb 2019 - 4:14:36 PM
Anonymous
18 Feb 2019 - 3:58:33 PM



>>5247957
Right next to where the traffic cam pics were taken.

qmap.pub...

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
Easy cowboy. Don't put words in my mouth.

I asked for an example of an attempted coup, not an example of political bias, which is the crux of the matter. Nobody denies political biases exist. But THIS specific example ( the dossier, FISA, Russia, etc. ) is unprecedented.

Thank you for helping me prove my point.

First off the use of the word coup is wrong. That was my original point.

I then said that what people are calling a coup is just digging up dirt on an opposing politician to bring them down and that this was SOP in DC. You then asked for an example and I offered Q as an example.

Someone, maybe you, then said DOJ and gov intelligence was used against Trump and that this was weaponizing of those depts for political reasons and I reminded everyone here that Q is also, supposedly, part of a gov dept doing the same thing.

What's good for the goose and all that.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Your turn.

You got The Corinthia Hotel again.

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
2793
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
18 Feb 2019 - 3:50:20 PM
Chatter uptick re: how to effectively prevent cross-talk re: anti-narrative across all social media/online platforms.
Ability to prevent cross-talk narrows comms only to FAKE NEWS which provides for more control over what is released to inform the public.
A series of scenarios is currently being conducted ['game the sys'] to test response, risk, and calc results.
'Censorship' [added] layers of inserted code 'through keyword targeting' in bio, history, and comments + indiv platform mods has failed to curtail the problem.
'China-Russia-Iran' 'fake' take-down hacks of select platforms (for maintenance) is one scenario being game-played.
[Zero-Day]
Countermeasures in place.
[Example]
Think Emergency Alert System.
Think WH controlled *new* RT 'news' website
Think WH controlled *new* video stream platform
Think Here.
Should this occur, immediate steps will be taken to classify each as 'Public Utility' (essential public services) to gain appropriate gov regulation (control).
Why do we make things public?
Q

qmap.pub...

If social media platforms were classified as "essential public services," then they would be prohibited from discriminating based on politics (among other considerations). Your local electric company cannot refuse to sell you power because they don't like your politics. They would get into huge trouble if they even tried to track such a thing. And whether it's a private company or not would make no difference.

NEW Q? qmap.pub...

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex


Two snips from your link.

A recent study showed that a stunning 60% of Brits believe in at least one conspiracy theory.

“Can me and my pals Raid MI6 DVD & GO2 Offices in London ourselves please”

Redundant Array of Independent D elinquent elusional eciduous olphin.....
No "q" but lots of D potential?

Guess we all don't have "Q" teeth some too busy counting dolphin teeth?

a reply to: Justinajr

Yep! 2797 and 2798. That is the Corinthia Hotel