It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

page: 200
<< 197  198  199    201  202  203 >>

log in


posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 12:32 AM
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Very strange because that is not what is showing on my end.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 12:37 AM
Haven't seen this talked about yet. If it has I apologize. Linkypoo

Over two years after the fact, newly released FBI emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request confirm that James Comey’s FBI attempted to work out a quid pro quo deal with the Obama State Department to help minimize the Hillary Clinton private email server scandal just weeks before the 2016 election.

Seems interesting to me, yeah?
edit on 2/15/2019 by imthegoat because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 12:41 AM

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct ‘deep in narrative’ mob as method to remove. 

This part isn't clear to me. Is Q suggesting to anons to use caution while follwing Jordan Sather?

Or is he suggesting that WaPo and company are targeting Sather and for HIM to use caution?

The C_A targeted the NSA by using its former agent, 'Edward Snowden', planting him within the NSA via his employment with Booz Allen Hamilton.

I think Q is warning us that Jordan Sather’s high follower count will be used to misdirect and remove the truth.

"Be careful who you follow." Q has stated this phrase several times.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 01:40 AM
a reply to: imthegoat

That's new to me. I read where Hillary Clinton's lawyers forced James Comey to say the FBI had scanned 60,000 Hillary e-mails in 3 days, and found nothing new on Weiner's laptop. But nothing about a "deal" between the FBI and the State Dept..

Their criminal schemes get more complicated with each revelation, don't they?

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 02:33 AM
Here we go again.. More evidence that Rod Rosenstein is one of the "Good guys".

“The deputy attorney general (Rod Rosenstein) in fact appointed special counsel Robert Mueller, and directed that Mr. McCabe be removed from any participation in that investigation,” a DOJ spokesperson said in a statement.

In the nine days between Comey’s firing and Mueller’s appointment, a series of events occurred suggesting that Rosenstein wrested control of the investigation from McCabe.

On May 11, as McCabe testified before the Senate intelligence committee, Rosenstein pulled the committee chairman and ranking member into a private meeting in a secure room.

On May 16, one day before the appointment of the special counsel, Rosenstein met with Trump and Mueller.

“We were interviewing replacements at the F.B.I. Did you know Mueller was one of the people that was being interviewed?” Trump told The New York Times. “… now what happens is, [Mueller] leaves the office. Rosenstein leaves the office. The next day, he is appointed special counsel.”
Excerpted from:

Didn't Q say something like: Great actors make the movie great?

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 04:58 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

What are C_A/Bezos/WaPo playing at? What are C_A/Bezos/WaPo REALLY playing at?


Saturday was a turning point in American history.

For perhaps the first time ever, one of the biggest legacy news organizations published a fair, fact-based article about a political assassination without dismissing, out of hand, any evidence of conspiracy.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 05:24 AM


Be alert next 10 days.
FF attempts may be carried out in attempt to change narrative (neg optics).
High possibility of ‘multiple day’ coverage event forcing pause on news.
See something > Say something.

And two more neQs:


edit on 15-2-2019 by MindBodySpiritComplex because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:15 AM
My favorite Q drop of all time:

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 06:37 AM

originally posted by: queenofswords

For some reason, I'm getting the feeling that the LA helicopter "drill" is connected to this somehow.

I've not seen it stated anywhere, but when I watch those videos I get the impression they are removing bodies.

The buildings were set to be demolished, they removed the bodies before the evidenced got destroyed.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 07:33 AM
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Here's a screen scrape of what I'm seeing on

Are you looking at the same board of Qmap?

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 07:52 AM
I looked at that Q Post and all I could see is this, so I made it.

Meme time:

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:03 AM
Happy Friday! - Here is some new Q for you -

Future Proves the Past (Q Proof)
15 Feb 2019 - 5:37:13 AM
15 Feb 2019 - 5:32:48 AM
>DOJ held meetings on how to oust President Trump
>Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?

ANONs knew it beforehand.
You have more than you know.
It’s all there.
Future proves past.

15 Feb 2019 - 6:04:25 AM

Remember the cover story for this?
Coincidence re: AF1 re: CA route NK?
Bigger than 25th amendment attempt to remove.
Depth of this is very serious.

15 Feb 2019 - 6:17:48 AM
15 Feb 2019 - 6:10:39 AM
Wife of burned, amputee Veteran here..we are ready, we are with you… we will continue to fight. God speed Q+++
Your husband answered the call as a brave and selfless Patriot.
We are forever grateful for his service & sacrifice to this Country.
May god bless you and your family.
Honor & respect.
edit on 15-2-2019 by Sabrechucker because: edit

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:04 AM
Does this look like Dianne Feinstein?

She is head of intelligence, is she not?

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:19 AM
2 of 7 Meeting in Secret Identified: Andrew McCabe & Rod Rosenstein
15 Feb 2019 - 6:41:46 AM


Think McCabe [#2] interview re: meeting re: 25th amendment
Think [RR] wear a wire re: attempt to entrap re: 25th….
[2] accounted for?
IDEN remaining coming.
Note ‘Border Open’ context same drop.
Border has more importance than what is publicly disclosed.

15 Feb 2019 - 9:06:01 AM📁
Dark to Light.
The orders came from the highest office in the land.

15 Feb 2019 - 9:18:38 AM📁

edit on 15-2-2019 by Sabrechucker because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:31 AM
a reply to: Skada

Great work on the blow up pic Skada!

To me the target doesn't look skinny or flat chested enough for Dianne Feinstein.

Looks more like Nancy Pelosi, Lisa Page or Huma Abedin to me - but, if real time, I guess we can discount Pelosi.

edit on 15-2-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:37 AM
a reply to: Skada

Probably not. Car too small and she would be driven to her destination and not be getting in or out in the middle of traffic. Likely, she would be hidden better and have her meetings in a hotel or venue where others would come to her.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:39 AM

We have been warned in Q Posts #1043 and #1044 that the NET will be shutdown or paused when certain truths come out.

Therefore, I will be posting an interim archive of this thread pt15 in next couple hours.

I recommend that people download and copy to a USB flash drive if possible.
edit on 15-2-2019 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:41 AM
a reply to: pteridine

Maybe I got the wrong target, maybe the target is not in that Pic... That hair style stood out to me as Di's "normal" hair that she wears.

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 08:57 AM
February 15 (F15): POTUS to Declare National Emergency over Border (Q Proof)
15 Feb 2019 - 9:21:58 AM
15 Feb 2019 - 9:19:09 AM
YES…the F15 plane pic Q posted.
feb 15th

NAT EM today?

posted on Feb, 15 2019 @ 09:01 AM

originally posted by: pavil

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: pavil

Those numbers deleted appear to be actor friends of Smolett who did the so called "attack".

That appears to be a reach. I fail to see how a redacted phone list proves anything simply based on who the guy talked too. It will take much more than what has been reported to prove anything. Maybe they can flip a friend or something but unless they have said people that he made calls too in the area at the time of the crime i would not buy too much into it yet.


We will see how this story turns out. The Police must be wrong in their conclusions so far, right?

His story is pretty much toast now.

No i heard the police statements this morning and they are not wrong. What is wrong is all the jumping to conclusions and false reporting going on.

<< 197  198  199    201  202  203 >>

log in