It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Over two years after the fact, newly released FBI emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request confirm that James Comey’s FBI attempted to work out a quid pro quo deal with the Obama State Department to help minimize the Hillary Clinton private email server scandal just weeks before the 2016 election.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Use caution - high follower count targeting to direct ‘deep in narrative’ mob as method to remove.
This part isn't clear to me. Is Q suggesting to anons to use caution while follwing Jordan Sather?
Or is he suggesting that WaPo and company are targeting Sather and for HIM to use caution?
Excerpted from: www.theepochtimes.com...
“The deputy attorney general (Rod Rosenstein) in fact appointed special counsel Robert Mueller, and directed that Mr. McCabe be removed from any participation in that investigation,” a DOJ spokesperson said in a statement.
In the nine days between Comey’s firing and Mueller’s appointment, a series of events occurred suggesting that Rosenstein wrested control of the investigation from McCabe.
On May 11, as McCabe testified before the Senate intelligence committee, Rosenstein pulled the committee chairman and ranking member into a private meeting in a secure room.
On May 16, one day before the appointment of the special counsel, Rosenstein met with Trump and Mueller.
“We were interviewing replacements at the F.B.I. Did you know Mueller was one of the people that was being interviewed?” Trump told The New York Times. “… now what happens is, [Mueller] leaves the office. Rosenstein leaves the office. The next day, he is appointed special counsel.”
Saturday was a turning point in American history.
For perhaps the first time ever, one of the biggest legacy news organizations published a fair, fact-based article about a political assassination without dismissing, out of hand, any evidence of conspiracy.
Be alert next 10 days.
FF attempts may be carried out in attempt to change narrative (neg optics).
High possibility of ‘multiple day’ coverage event forcing pause on news.
See something > Say something.
originally posted by: queenofswords
For some reason, I'm getting the feeling that the LA helicopter "drill" is connected to this somehow.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: pavil
Those numbers deleted appear to be actor friends of Smolett who did the so called "attack".
That appears to be a reach. I fail to see how a redacted phone list proves anything simply based on who the guy talked too. It will take much more than what has been reported to prove anything. Maybe they can flip a friend or something but unless they have said people that he made calls too in the area at the time of the crime i would not buy too much into it yet.
We will see how this story turns out. The Police must be wrong in their conclusions so far, right?
His story is pretty much toast now.