35 Times FBI “Deviated Standard Practice”/Committed Crimes to Exonerate Hilary/Indict Trump

For those of you unfamiliar with Dan Bongino he is hands down the single best resource I've found that genuinely is 2 weeks ahead of the news cycle. If you are new to DB I would recommend going back through his pod casts. It's well worth the time.

This podcast breaks down what this is all really about. An illegal spy campaign perpetrated by the Obama administration. Heads are going to roll and someone is going to jail.

This is going to go down as the greatest PROVABLE scandal in US political history.

bongino.com...

EDIT: The insert YouTube link is not working for some reason.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Extorris

This thread is about the article itself and a perfectly reasonable place to discuss each line item, but if you're unwilling or unable to refute them, then a thread per item is not going to change that.

You don't even have to do it in one post, you can make a post per item if you like. That way you won't run into the character limit.

No one will do it

I can’t tell you how many threads I have made about one item in this list or others showing the intel communities corruption or double standard, and it is just ignored by them

Then they later make the claim they have debunked all claims of double standards and corruption

The willingness to cheer for or ignore this because they don’t like trump is astonishing

All that and still no investigation...

Yet they are pursuing a case based on a falsified dossier.

Ugh

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Xtrozero
The problem is whether this is a big issue or not. What does it mean as to whether inappropriate actions happened or not. How does someone on the right see it as a big foul and someone on the left say no big deal. We all on both sides would see robbing a 7/11 as the same thing, so how do we get to that same point with something like this. The OP makes it sound like a big deal, but then the FBI internal audits has not supported that most likely, and it seems neither has Congress on any large scale.

The op source correctly points out that, using your analogy, robbing a 7/11 is bad if you are a Republican/Conservative/Trump Supporter and robbing a 7/11 is ok if you are a Democrat/Liberal/Never Trumper.

Thanks, you saved me the bother of reading something that is seriously skewed to present Trump as the victim and Clinton as the purveyor of all evil. Do you only ever read things that support your own bias?

originally posted by: uncommitted
Do you only ever read things that support your own bias?

No more so than you.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: uncommitted
Do you only ever read things that support your own bias?

No more so than you.

Not really, you made it clear the article backed up what you wanted to read, accuracy is just a boring thing isn't it?

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: uncommitted
Do you only ever read things that support your own bias?

No more so than you.

Not really, you made it clear the article backed up what you wanted to read, accuracy is just a boring thing isn't it?

Then by all means, refute it.