It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Freeborn
What's pissed me off most is the sheer incompetence of our elected officials and their arrogance and conceit in their determination to assert their authority over the will of the people.
Regardless of how close it was there was still a clear majority for coming out of the EU - Parliament should unequivocally back that and ensure it is acted upon.
They have spectacularly failed to do so.
And they now insist that they have the final say and not the people despite their blatant dishonesty and incompetence.
.....do you have any evidence that the UK is evolving at present ?
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: Bloodworth
really , rapidly evolving under 10 years of austerity , where did you find that out ? or better yet do you have any evidence that the UK is evolving at present ?
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Southern Guardian
While I don't personally feel leaving the EU would be in Britain's best interest I don't believe a second referendum should be held. The people voted, their votes should be honored. I've heard some claim that Parliament is sovereign, the referendum wasn't necessarily binding, doesn't matter to me. What message will you be sending if you just decide to ignore the last vote and do it over again? That's not good for democracy at all.
If there's no-deal then let it be. That's the path voters chose in 2016. I honestly wish the best for our cousins... and for the EU.... to new horizons I guess.
I never really understand this argument. Given that 2.5 years have passed and that we now know what the options on leaving are what would be any way undemocratic about another referendum?
Polls now suggest that the clear majority of people oppose leaving, the idea that we should go ahead with the economic masochism of Brexit based just on a narrow majority from over 2 years ago is absurd.
Why does 2.5 years passing negate the People's Vote? Everyone knew at the time it wasn't a vote to immediately leave.
If you would like to poll shop, here's one that says the public still back leaving.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
Maybe Brexit hating BBC and Sky News could decide everything for us from their polls going forward. That would be so much easier for Brussels.
By the way the YouGov poll which is the one being pushed around so much actually asks people about leaving based on May's deal vs staying. This is how the propagandists owned by globalists are actually trying to fool people.
In the same poll, it's very clear on which party people would vote for in a General Election that the option for Conservative if they promise to Leave is the most popular.
I've heard some awful arguments for a 2nd referendum, but yours is by far the worst... absurd even.
We've had the People's vote.
originally posted by: Maya00a
Pete Credlin Brexit
Interesting points in this video
originally posted by: Bloodworth
The EU will only hold the English back who are a very rapidly evolving country.
Computer models show the European community will be in dire needs In 15 years.
Run.....and then cleanse your country and continue to move forward
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Bloodworth
The EU will only hold the English back who are a very rapidly evolving country.
Computer models show the European community will be in dire needs In 15 years.
Run.....and then cleanse your country and continue to move forward
What about N.Ireland? Scotland? Wales? When people from outside the UK chime in on this (and your opinions are very welcome) it's always England, England, England!
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Bloodworth
The EU will only hold the English back who are a very rapidly evolving country.
Computer models show the European community will be in dire needs In 15 years.
Run.....and then cleanse your country and continue to move forward
What about N.Ireland? Scotland? Wales? When people from outside the UK chime in on this (and your opinions are very welcome) it's always England, England, England!
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
No that is not the clearest information we have.
As I pointed about above, polls seem to be asking about 'Stay' or 'leave with May's deal'. Bogus. I'd answer 'stay' to that question too, because the deal gives MORE power to the EU.
Your phony polls don't override the People's Vote, which we've had, or the law which says we leave at the end of March.
Whether you like it or not, the People voted to leave the EU. All that is left is to leave.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: ScepticScot
No that is not the clearest information we have.
As I pointed about above, polls seem to be asking about 'Stay' or 'leave with May's deal'. Bogus. I'd answer 'stay' to that question too, because the deal gives MORE power to the EU.
Your phony polls don't override the People's Vote, which we've had, or the law which says we leave at the end of March.
Whether you like it or not, the People voted to leave the EU. All that is left is to leave.
The question
If there was another referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU, how would you vote?
Shows a clear lead for remain.
whatukthinks.org...
Have you a link showing different? I agree polls are insufficient, which is why we need another referendum.
originally posted by: micpsi
But opinions constantly change. Maybe in six months time, polls will show that the majority of British people want to leave the EU, just as the referendum indicated two years ago. Will you be happy if yet another referendum is arranged to overthrow the one you now want merely because the last one did not get the result you wanted?
My point is: in the UK government policies are not determined by referenda. They are determined by elections. Even six months after an election, a government could become so unpopular that another election would lead to a different result. But no one advocates constantly having elections merely because public opinion has become fickle. So asking for another referendum is merely a case of being a poor loser.
Have you a link showing different? I agree polls are insufficient, which is why we need another referendum.