It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Secure Fence Act of 2006" / Final Vote Results Congress

page: 1
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 07:35 AM
link   
Everything doesn't need to be a mystery or conspiracy. Hillary, Obama, Schumer, Feinstein and Boxer voted YEA [Yes] and Pelosi voted Nea [NO] So here's the link as to who voted for it and who didn't. Here you go


FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 446


(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H R 6061 RECORDED VOTE 14-Sep-2006 3:41 PM
QUESTION: On Passage
BILL TITLE: Secure Fence Act of 2006



clerk.house.gov...
edit on 13-1-2019 by Waterglass because: table would not align



And for the SENATE, including Hilary Clinton, Barrack Obama, McCain, Schumer

www.senate.gov...
edit on 13-1-2019 by Waterglass because: added




posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:05 AM
link   
So it looks like Pelosi will be responsible for the Longest government shutdown in history. Pretty nefarious reputation to downplay ?



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:05 AM
link   
edit
edit on 13-1-2019 by TinySickTears because: (no reason given)


yeah if you read it you can see the wording does not mention a 2k mile physical wall.

duel layers of fence on specific 5 and 10 mile stretches
cameras
drones
etc etc



edit on 13-1-2019 by TinySickTears because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus
So it looks like Pelosi will be responsible for the Longest government shutdown in history. Pretty nefarious reputation to downplay ?


so even when trump takes responsibility for it he is not responsible for it?

got it


(post by Plotus removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:13 AM
link   
Everyone sees it as a pissing match..... who will cave first



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus
He is willing to negotiate, ...POST REMOVED BY STAFF


he is?

they asked to open the government and re open negotiations.
he said no.

walked out of the last meeting.

how is that willing to negotiate?
edit on Sun Jan 13 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus
Everyone sees it as a pissing match..... who will cave first


we should all be able to agree on that.

both sides are at fault
but he shouldered the responsibility.

its on him



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:15 AM
link   
Are these the same jokers on video using their canes to also push buttons for whoever else is seated near them, but couldn't bother to show up to work?

Just looking for clarification.
Side note, it's almost 2020. These folks aren't rising horses, they read a document and push a button. Why hasn't their entire job been replaced with an app yet? Better question, when can we go from hiring these redundant jackwagons and start cutting on these things directly?



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:23 AM
link   
It is my understanding Pelosi has said No waving her finger emphatically at every meeting, and it would appear she wants unimpeded open borders all the way back to BILL TITLE: Secure Fence Act of 2006 HR 60 61.



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:30 AM
link   
well it was suggested they reopen the gov and continue negotiations and trump said no.

and as i said above about the act of 06
not the same proposal as a 2k miles wall


it talks about 2 layers of fencing at certain 5 and 10 mile stretches.


so if you are for say 50 miles of fence at certain places you must them be for 2k miles of wall???



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: TinySickTears
edit

yeah if you read it you can see the wording does not mention a 2k mile physical wall.

duel layers of fence on specific 5 and 10 mile stretches
cameras
drones
etc


** Since your edit, were these the things HR 6061 was pushing for ? **
edit on 13-1-2019 by Plotus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:34 AM
link   
Yes, I'm in favor of a Wall/fence the entire length of the southern border.



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus

yeah if you read it you can see the wording does not mention a 2k mile physical wall.

duel layers of fence on specific 5 and 10 mile stretches
cameras
drones
etc


Since your edit, were these the things HR 6061 was pushing for ?


as i understood it yes
i edited cause i misread

i just dont see how this 06 proposal is the same as the one now
edit on 13-1-2019 by TinySickTears because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:38 AM
link   
OH, I agree. There are vague similarities to be sure, but at a great deal less than a 2,000 + mile wall/Fence.



a reply to: TinySickTears



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 08:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus
OH, I agree. There are vague similarities to be sure, but at a great deal less than a 2,000 + mile wall/Fence.



a reply to: TinySickTears



so we are on the same page.

but when some people say things like "well the dims wanted it then but dont want it now just cause trump"

we can see that is not entirely true.

as many have been saying

you can support border security without supporting the wall.

looks like this proposal is a good example of that



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Plotus
He is willing to negotiate, the Dims are not, specifically Pelosi the leader


LOL Yeah, he's willing to call his wall a fence, if it will make the Dems happy. It won't.



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 10:38 AM
link   
They added 548 miles of border fencing, making the wall 658 miles, or one third of the US/Mexico border. Maybe they’re scared of finishing the job. At least we now know their hypocrisy.



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Propagandalf


The Secure Fence Act does not cover, nor have lawmakers ever approved, legislated for or provided funding for a border long wall along the southernn border.

Lawmakers did inlcude over $20 billion, in the 2019 budget, for southern border secutity, and $1.6 billion for Trump's hairbraned wall, but Trump turned it down.



edit on 13-1-2019 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 11:06 AM
link   
IFocracy hard at work

any means necessary






top topics



 
11
<<   2 >>

log in

join