It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: WeRpeons
Outrage at a lack of respect shown should not be determinent of a legal case.
Personally I find the levels that Jones went to were distasteful, however there were elements of the event that have been discussed in several places. I think Jones should have stopped well short of criticising or implicating the parents - that was just way beyond the pale IMO. Still, the parents will have to show that Jones:
- Published or otherwise broadcast an unprivileged, false statement of fact about the plaintiff;
- Caused material harm to the plaintiff by publishing or broadcasting said false statement of fact;
- Acted either negligently or with actual malice
kellywarnerlaw.com...
Outrage is not going to cut it.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: sooth
For a guy who the majority of rational people consider a bloviating idiot they sure are putting forth quite the concerted effort to silence and destroy him. Almost makes one think that perhaps he was (likely accidentally) right about something and struck a deep nerve.
I wonder what it was...
Conspiracy theorists used to be laughed at and dismissed. Not so much anymore it seems.
When he got banned from youtube I had a listen to his show - he said he is being sued all over the place (multiple suits ranging from this one to using an image on his website). It does seem that there is a coordinated effort to take him down.
I'd say that is more of a story than anything he said about Sandy Hook.
originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey
originally posted by: AspiringSorcerer
This is a victory against free speech, and if you can't understand that then there is no helping you. If you're cheering for the censorship of anyone, including people you personally disagree with no matter how insane you think they are, you don't believe in the fundamental freedoms laid out in the Bill of Rights. For everyone pushing the silencing of others, are you 100% certain this could never be used against your "side"?
No one took away his free speech. Free speech got him into this. They just made him responsible for his actions. Now what group of folks is always harping on about being responsible for actions....Little help?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: UKTruth
Why? That OP would have sounded exactly the same coming from the majority of people.
Jones pushing the shooting was some form of sick hoax is deserving of nothing less than utter disdain. As is Jones. The fact that he himself probably doesn't believe it makes it worse.
More power to those folks, and I wish 'em well.
Wasn't there some big posts here on ATS about crisis actors in both Sandy Hook and Boston bombing? Some judge deciding what to censor is concerning just as is all the media outlets doing the same, I do not even listen to AJ and it seems this last year or so the thought police is gaining strength.
originally posted by: Carcharadon
Boston bombing is a complete hoax.
Oh it happened all right, not disputing that at all. But the official story is complete nonsense. Just like Vegas.
originally posted by: FilthyUSMonkey
a reply to: AtlasHawk
This is how they are trying to silence future conspiracy theorists and those who dare to question the official narratives and even go as far by investigating when MSM outlets wont even do real journalism anymore.
NO, this is how irresponsible speech that causes anguish to the parents of murdered children is handled in the United States per the constitution. These were not public figures, and their lives, and their dead children were used by a self-proclaimed entertainer to sell snake oil on his web site.
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: UKTruth
Why? That OP would have sounded exactly the same coming from the majority of people.
Jones pushing the shooting was some form of sick hoax is deserving of nothing less than utter disdain. As is Jones. The fact that he himself probably doesn't believe it makes it worse.
More power to those folks, and I wish 'em well.
Wasn't there some big posts here on ATS about crisis actors in both Sandy Hook and Boston bombing? Some judge deciding what to censor is concerning just as is all the media outlets doing the same, I do not even listen to AJ and it seems this last year or so the thought police is gaining strength.
Boston bombing is a complete hoax.
Oh it happened all right, not disputing that at all. But the official story is complete nonsense. Just like Vegas.
originally posted by: AspiringSorcerer
This is a victory against free speech, and if you can't understand that then there is no helping you. If you're cheering for the censorship of anyone, including people you personally disagree with no matter how insane you think they are, you don't believe in the fundamental freedoms laid out in the Bill of Rights. For everyone pushing the silencing of others, are you 100% certain this could never be used against your "side"?
originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Southern Guardian
The media and now judges can completly wipe someone out completely. Kinda alarming
He says some crazy stuff but I for sure dont agree with shutting him down and censoring him completely. What happens if they keep censoring and destroying others they don't like?