It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: China Releases First Panoramic Shot From The Dark Side Of The Moon

page: 5
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 01:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: TheSkunk
Can I ask why the crater is only indented with out an impact rim?


because it was created by electricity .

No it wasn't. A nearby impact obliterated part of that crater's wall. Stop trying to plug your "Electric Universe theory" into anything that seems mysterious or questionable.
edit on 12-1-2019 by wildespace because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: wildespace




No it wasn't. A nearby impact obliterated part of that crater's wall. Stop trying to plug your "Electric Universe theory" into anything that seems mysterious or questionable.


That is not the case. Most of the large craters on the moon are flat at the bottoms. This does not fit the ratio for impact craters that should be a lot deeper.

Go and have a look for yourself.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: shawmanfromny

Well... i dont see any alien bases!

And maybe you should have rotated the photo on your pc before uploading it and just shrinking it a bit in size?


You won't see any anomalies in what they release, because they have been manipulated out. What is needed are the RAW images.
Just like the often argument that people rightly demand the RAW footage and RAW images of someone's UFO pics.


What do you think the answer would be to someone demanding the RAW images?



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer
Doesn't support any verifiable evidence of your 'created by electricity' assertions though.
Perhaps if you had expressed it as an blind opinion not fact then the member would have ignored your comment.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

Why would I want my comment ignored. I enjoy engaging and sharing information. In respect to your comment that is an opinion based on a foundation without any shared knowledge:


They simply dont know why the largest crates on the moon are flat bottomed. Go and have a look for yourself. The scientific explanation is that they have filled in from geological process through time. There is no proof that this is the case.

Go and look for yourself at the two distinct different shaped craters on the moon. It is evident which ones are impact craters. They are more bowl shaped and sometimes have an extra lip in the middle. The flat shaped crater is typically found occurring in metal work when arcing occurs in metal welding.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: wildespace




No it wasn't. A nearby impact obliterated part of that crater's wall. Stop trying to plug your "Electric Universe theory" into anything that seems mysterious or questionable.



kekers

Go and have a look at the sea of seranity crater on the near side of the moon. Its massive. You explain to me why it is so flat and point out the nearby impact the obliterated the crates wall..



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: purplemer
They simply dont know why the largest crates on the moon are flat bottomed.
So don't assert your 'electricity' opinions as fact. You don't know either, as I don't, but I don't make assertions out of my opinions.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:42 PM
link   
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy




So don't assert your 'electricity' opinions as fact. You don't know either, as I don't, but I don't make assertions out of my opinions.


You do make assertions. You did so above. My statement remains my truth until someone can challenge it the correct way. Something you have failed to do.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer
I haven't made any unverifiable assertions, only pointed out your to the class.
Try again.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy

You have. Evidently you cannot see it. Thats your illusion. I will leave it there at the risk of going off topic. Try using your noggin and addressing the information I shared which i stand by.

You have not even been able to share an opposing assertion. Why the flatness?




posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: wildespace

originally posted by: purplemer

originally posted by: TheSkunk
Can I ask why the crater is only indented with out an impact rim?


because it was created by electricity .

No it wasn't. A nearby impact obliterated part of that crater's wall. Stop trying to plug your "Electric Universe theory" into anything that seems mysterious or questionable.


A nearby impact obliterated part of that crater's wall??? Have you even looked at the picture?? Ridiculous.

The indent caught my eye too, very strange looking thing. It doesn't even look like an impact crater. It looks as though it tapers inwards. Very unusual.
edit on 12-1-2019 by Sirstudly because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sirstudly



Yes and look closer!

Closer!

Look at the very small crates. What caused them to occur. What rained down on the moon to make this happen.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: purplemer
Oh behave, I haven't asserted anything, go on, directly quote me, you can't.
I'm telling the class that your assertions are just opinions.
You have nothing to verify that the craters were created by electricity, nothing...or share with the class what evidence you have aside from questions and opinions.
I do not assert they were not created by electricity, just that you have zero evidence to assert they were.
If you just admit that all you have is opinion and belief then we can drop this.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Sirstudly



Yes and look closer!

Closer!

Look at the very small crates. What caused them to occur. What rained down on the moon to make this happen.



Its an excellent photo.

I also agree about the crater depth issue. There isn't enough variance in the depths. Certainly for the diameter of some of the craters they should be a lot deeper. The moon is a very odd thing indeed.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: TheSkunk
Can I ask why the crater is only indented with out an impact rim?


If you look carefully you'll see that there is one, it's just not very pronounced.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Sirstudly

Citation required.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: purplemer
Oh behave, I haven't asserted anything, go on, directly quote me, you can't.
I'm telling the class that your assertions are just opinions.
You have nothing to verify that the craters were created by electricity, nothing...or share with the class what evidence you have aside from questions and opinions.
I do not assert they were not created by electricity, just that you have zero evidence to assert they were.
If you just admit that all you have is opinion and belief then we can drop this.


Really you want to roll with it. Ok lets give it a try..




But more than forty years ago, the British journal Spaceflight published the laboratory experiments of Brian J. Ford, an amateur astronomer who raised the possibility that most of the craters on the moon were carved by cosmic electrical discharge. (Spaceflight 7, January, 1965).

In the cited experiments Ford used a spark-machining apparatus to reproduce in miniature some of the most puzzling lunar features, including craters with central peaks, small craters preferentially perched on the high rims of larger craters, and craters strung out in long chains. He also observed that the ratio of large to small craters on the Moon matched the ratio seen in electrical arcing.


www.mikamar.biz...

Here is account that worked on plasma and steel. Have a look and a read. Interesting stuff!




I worked with Cryogenic fueled CNC Plasma gantrys [underwater cut]

steel and alloy to the depth of 6 inches was annihilated in seconds of the plasma ion stream hitting/starting. its not like oxy/ace where you pre heat and pierce this process lances thru the steel and alloy at the atomic level like a hot knife in a block of butter.

we did have moments when the machine's cut head failed, the electron stripping of components over operational time, the head would explode [sometimes]....or the arc would run off and scatter as the circuit ended you would get a sheet of steel or alloy with ray scars* on it running out every direction,...

.just like Tyco on the Moon looks. some scarring seen on moons and planets in our solar system is the nearing end of the arc strike...anode/cathode event arc strikes of course will run off into higher conductive materials, and be reduced [partially]......by lesser conductive materials I would say its probable that the Mare/Marei - flows have something to do with interface with duration, Jupiter is Electrically machining its Moon Io with a 5 Billion amp current sheet .....Io has surface flows,...internal heat dissipation/migration


grahamhancock.com...,710582,710599

Now I could link this in with the mythos that matches this event but that would be going a little off topic.

But go have a read. Interesting stuff


Remember Purplemer aint no bear!






posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Where did all the rock go? And why is this earlier pano have the rover further along than these ones? I'm new btw, don't know if this vid link will work.
edit on 12-1-2019 by spacedoubt because: (fixed video link)

edit on 12-1-2019 by spacedoubt because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus i kind like the plutaloons



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: FormOfTheLord

Helium (H-3), energy source abundant there. China to Mine H3 for Fusion







 
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join