It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
However, from what I have read, the cameras and film would have made it impossible for the negatives to have survived.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
Hey Kid,
"Again, just because we saw the rocket lift off and disappear, doesn't have anything to do with landing on the moon."
this is where I sense you are straining to belive what you want to beleive, not considering facts objectively.
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangarae
I think maybe you guys should consider something, if the moon landing was faked when all this conspiracy talk started happening the guys behind it would of freaked out
I do not believe the moon landing was faked however...i believe the footage was in order to hide UFO's which the astronauts encountered.
Originally posted by PeanutButterJellyTime
You can't see stars from the Earth during the day, why would you see them from the moon during the day?
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by Terapin
I'll never understand why anyone would believe that we couldnt have landed on the moon. We had the knowhow and resourses. It seems much easyer to actualy go there than to get several thousand people who were involved in the mission to agree to fake it and then never tell a soul. Ever try and get a bunch of friends to keep a total secret about something realy big??
First, even though you criticize my basic premise, that's fine. I'm looking for all points of view. Second, would you answer these two questions?
How old were you when the cold war ended? (1990)
Why hasn't any other government followed us to the moon?
Originally posted by siriuslyone
Question==Why has not Hubble or any other sat's taken close=up pics to shut up the conspiracy theorists?
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by siriuslyone
Question==Why has not Hubble or any other sat's taken close=up pics to shut up the conspiracy theorists?
Good point. Why havn't they?
You guys who are skeptical of my skepticism don't seem to have any faith in our psy/ops capabilities.
To the thoroughly recycled question of how can that many people keep such a big secret?! It's called need-to-know. Anyone in the military can tell you, as a foot soldier, you have incredible minimal knowledge regarding operations. You are told specifically what you need to know in order to do your job. You are kept in the dark about everything else around you - with the exception of what can cull w/your own contacts. It's genious.
I wish somebody in the know (from other countries) could tell me WHY no other country has followed us there. None of the reasons given here hold up.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yeah, that may be so, EastCoastKid, but what I am finding even more ironic, as applied to what you have just said above, is that there are people who can't handle the "THOUGHT" that we did in fact land on the moon.
The Moon-Landing Hoax and conspiracy is so worn and debunkedx1000 and yet, again, as applied to what you said above, some simply can't choke done the truth.....or the "thought" thereof....
can you reply to all 5 points I made ? the mirrors, rocks etc
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Oooh.. Sardion, you just flamed me so hard!
Not.
If you don't like my thread, quit whining and go start your own.
Originally posted by new_falcon_XXI
- did anybody mention the "Van-Allen-Belt"? This is a zone of highly radioactive rays around the earth in about 400 km distance.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
2) NASA employed 400,000 people at the time. don't you think a leak would've come about about a fake ? somewhere along the line ?
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
It's called need-to-know.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
4) the soviets were watching, and would have busted us if we faked it.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
5) what about more than 800 pounds (363 kilograms) of rocks brought back from the moon. "Geologists worldwide have been examining these samples for 30 years, and the conclusion is inescapable. The rocks could not have been collected or manufactured on Earth," NASA states on its Web site. Regardless, the conspiracy theory remains today.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by new_falcon_XXI
- did anybody mention the "Van-Allen-Belt"? This is a zone of highly radioactive rays around the earth in about 400 km distance.
“Radioactive rays”
Someone needs to go back to school and study basic physics.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Again, as it was pointed out in the previous post, this subject has been discussed to death in other threads.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
BTW, were you on ATS before, under a different handle? You remind me of a certain cold kitty cat.