It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kamala Harris Says She’s Open To Ocasio-Cortez’s Socialist Agenda

page: 4
19
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 11 2019 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

Ah, I see, so reality is your enemy.

If you fall off a cliff, reach terminal velocity, and will die hitting the ground. Those facts are your enemy because they are taking authority over you.

Good luck with your life.




posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical

originally posted by: Salander

originally posted by: xuenchen
They're all crawling out of the woodwork now that new Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is pushing Socialist agendas.

So we have popular U.S. Senator Kamala Harris on TV saying she is with it !!

Democrats going totally out of control now that they rampaged over the U.S. House of Representatives !!

Well let's show our support for losing our own freedoms shall we 😀🚬

Kamala is running for President in 2020 (in the U.S. not Cuba) 😆



Kamala Harris Says She’s Open To Ocasio-Cortez’s Socialist Agenda

Call it the Ocasio-Cortez Effect! Just two days after the freshman congresswoman announced on “60 Minutes” that Democrats should soak the rich with a 70 percent marginal tax rate, presidential hopeful Sen. Kamala Harris said on “The View” that she is open to it. Drawing on her experience as a teacher, Harris commended Ocasio-Cortez for “challenging the status quo,” and promised to “explore new ideas.”



I don't see how healthcare for all is "losing our freedoms", sorry.

I don't see how education for all is "losing our freedoms".


I also do not think having police and fire forces is losing our freedom either.


I never suggested that it did.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 03:17 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

maybe read what I wrote



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 04:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: ketsuko

maybe read what I wrote


As an anarchist, why are you so worried about what other people say think and do ?

👩🧔👩‍🦰👨‍🦰



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

I did. Any system that seeks authority over you ...

Still waiting for you to put forth more on your socialism than just telling us what it isn't. As I said, it's very easy to tell us what it's not and then claim we're wrong and don't know what it is.

But if there is no existing system like it on the face of the earth, then it is incumbent upon you to explain it and explain why no one should fear it. Until then, you're simply full of it.



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

...

do you have problems with reading comprehension? I have stated numerous times I AM NOT A SOCIALIST OR A COMMUNIST AND I DON'T SUPPORT SOCIALISM OR COMMUNISM

and I have stated numerous times what socialism in theory is, either you can't understand or are being willfully ignorant, either way...



posted on Jan, 12 2019 @ 09:46 PM
link   
January 12, 2019

Headline: Kamala Harris and Mazie Hirono are Religious Bigots.


There are a disturbing number of Democrat lawmakers who believe Christians must renounce their religious beliefs and affiliations in religious-based organizations if they want to hold public office.

The latest victim of this blatant religious bigotry is Brian Buescher, President Trump’s nominee for the U.S. District Court in Nebraska.

Buescher came under attack by Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., and Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, for his membership in the Knights of Columbus, a revered and highly-respected Catholic charitable organization.
More at: www.foxnews.com...

Could you imagine the DAMAGE that Kamala Harris would inflict upon America if she were to become our President in 2020? Holy crap! Hopefully, she'll be quickly knocked out of the Democratic primary.



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 06:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: ketsuko

No, No I am not actually


It's so easy to claim only you know what socialism is and it's not that bad when all you can do is claim that nothing is socialism.


And it would be even more easy to cherrypick democratic socialism apart, given the site we're on. What is it with you boring old farts, that you always have to make people play along with your dumb games that only circle around repetitive "debates".

Here's what you can do: find a left leaning site filled with various socialists of different kinds and go for it! You're obviously trying to say that Eisenhower was a staunch socialist and I really wanna see that debate kicking off. Best of luck to you!





edit on 14-1-2019 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 07:16 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

*yawn*

Here it is:

Take some systems the government already runs like the postal system, the public school system, and the VA, and make them quality systems without continually just sticking out your hand for more money that does nothing to improve anything about them, and we'll talk about whether or not the government then deserves to take over more of those critical services of ours on a national scale.

Do that or explain to me why it never happens in terms beyond "not enough money" because if those three systems don't and can't ever have enough money to make them work, what makes you think we can fund anything else on top of them and fund them adequately without taking in taxes a significant percentage of what most people are earning on a day to day basis.

And if, in order to make them work, we have to take the lion's share of what most people make on a day to day basis, why do you assume the majority of people would be happy to essentially become slaves to those systems and nothing but those systems without any chance to pick and chose things they want and need for themselves and their families?



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 07:22 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko




Here it is:


Here's the thing with morons calling a plain tax increase socialism: Eisenhower was a socialist as well.

That's logic in combination with this stupid spin of "yours", I hope you like it?



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join