It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Exellent UFO footage out of Utah taken in 2016 just now posted Clear What do you think ATS?

page: 11
79
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: fleabit

It clearly doesn't do anything you last three posters said. It just appears out of nowhere, goes down the side of the mountain, makes a left, then a banking right, and passes the camera. It never goes behind any ridge.

See this video:
streamable.com...
edit on 14-1-2019 by More1ThanAny1 because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 12:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: reject
Not to take away from the thread but UFO videos from the Philippines are clearer and documented by gov't and msm.

They always seem to hang around here for some reason.

I suspect a base.


Do you have any links to these Philippine UFO videos?

I'm surprised ATS...11 pages and not debunked yet? One thought this is next level video hoaxing. The second thought is the argument "with all these cameras everywhere why haven't we caught one yet?" Well this is one of those examples of catching one.



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 12:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: reject
Not to take away from the thread but UFO videos from the Philippines are clearer and documented by gov't and msm.

They always seem to hang around here for some reason.

I suspect a base.


Start a thread and post the videos that you think are real good



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 01:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: beetee
a reply to: Blaine91555

Take a look at this analysis done by a reddit user.

Zoomed in view showing object behind ridge

Seem to come from pretty far away.

Could still be cgi though.

BT


This is very interesting & cool!

I think it must be something Russian built is the best explanation for this.

Now the only question is how did it get to Utah from Russia and does the US Govt have any knowledge that this Russian "super spy drone" is operating on US spoil?



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 02:26 AM
link   
a reply to: TheOnlyBilko

Well, it's not conclusive, but certainly interesting.

I can't really think of any insect candidate that would fit, and would look like that at 60 fps.



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: game over man


Not debunked it's visible at 3.5 miles in the shot yet doesn't look large when it passes the camera the guy works in the film industry and takes 2 years to show this.



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 09:49 AM
link   
a reply to: TheTruthRocks

Because, of course, we know what an actual ufo would behave like on our planet.



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: More1ThanAny1
a reply to: fleabit

It clearly doesn't do anything you last three posters said. It just appears out of nowhere, goes down the side of the mountain, makes a left, then a banking right, and passes the camera. It never goes behind any ridge.

See this video:
streamable.com...


Please check this previously posted link. It's a 400% zoomed and slowed video, where it certainly does appear to disappear behind the treeline of the far ridge, twice. Again, could just be cleverly done CGI.

400% - slow-mo behind ridgeline



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 11:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: deanNS
a reply to: Imagewerx

Yeah I see no shadows for one. What we have been told is that ridge is 3.5 miles away. Fine then, even if it was, there is no true way for us how far that ""ufo" is away when it first appears, other than that it is within that 3.5 miles. All we see is the background with an object that seems to follow the ridge, but nobody can know. We only see a series of 2D pictures. It could be 3.5 miles, or 350 feet. It could be a bug.


From the metadata on original film, these are the GPS coordinates or the camera:

38°15'55.59"N 112°36'44.11"W

You can copy and paste into google maps to get a precise location.

Original Raw Footage Data:


File Name RAW FOOTAGE of UAP Sighting_ Beaver, Utah (October 18, 2016).MOV File Size 1235 MB File Type MOV File Type Extension mov Mime Type video/quicktime Major Brand Apple QuickTime (.MOV/QT) Minor Version 2014.2.0 COMPATIBLEBRANDS 0qt Movie Data Size 1295120164 Movie Data Offset 40 Movie Header Version 0 Create Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Modify Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Time Scale 60000 Duration 0:02:52 Preferred Rate 1 Preferred Volume 100.00% Preview Time 0 s Preview Duration 0 s Poster Time 0 s Selection Time 0 s Selection Duration 0 s Current Time 0 s Next Track Id 2 Gps Coordinates-Err 38 deg 15' 55.59" N, 112 deg 36' 44.11" W, 3.1 m Above Sea Level Speed X-Err +0.70 Speed Y-Err -0.20 Speed Z-Err +0.10 Pitch-Err +0.50 Yaw-Err +170.50 Roll-Err +2.50 Camera Pitch-Err +0.00 Camera Yaw-Err +171.90 Camera Roll-Err +0.00 Comment 0.9.198 Category v01.27.5134 Model FC550 Track Header Version 0 Track Create Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Track Modify Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Track Id 1 Track Duration 0:02:52 Track Layer 0 Track Volume 0.00% Matrix Structure 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Media Header Version 0 Media Create Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Media Modify Date 2016:10:18 11:19:22 Media Time Scale 60000 Media Duration 0:02:52 Handler Class Media Handler Handler Type Video Track Handler Description DJI.AVC Graphics Mode srcCopy Op Color 0 0 0 Compressor Id avc1 Source Image Width 1920 Source Image Height 1080 X Resolution 72 Y Resolution 72 Compressor Name Dji AVC encoder Bit Depth 24 Video Frame Rate 59.94 Gps Coordinates 38 deg 15' 55.59" N, 112 deg 36' 44.11" W, 3.1 m Above Sea Level Speed X +0.70 Speed Y -0.20 Speed Z +0.10 Pitch +0.50 Yaw +170.50 Roll +2.50 Camera Pitch +0.00 Camera Yaw +171.90 Camera Roll +0.00 Avg Bitrate 59.9 Mbps Gps Altitude 3.1 m Gps Altitude Ref Above Sea Level Gps Latitude 38 deg 15' 55.59" N Gps Longitude 112 deg 36' 44.11" W Image Size 1920x1080 Megapixels 2.1 Rotation 0 Gps Position 38 deg 15' 55.59" N, 112 deg 36' 44.11" W Mime Type video/quicktime Category video Type quicktime Raw Header 00 00 00 20 66 74 79 70 71 74 20 20 20 14 02 00 71 74 20 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4D 31 F7 2C 6D 64 61 74 00 00 00 02 09 10 00 00 00 20 06 00 0D 80 B8 92 FF F7 36 00 B8 92 FF F7

www.metabunk.org...

I do notice a "time scale" of 60000

Looking here it says the time scale should be 600 default for the setting.



Since a movie defaults to a time scale of 600, this is a good number to use.


developer.apple.com...

An expert would have to weigh in, but does that mean the video is in accelerated time? 100X and we could be seeing a bird or bug in hyper-speed?



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Extorris

I think this is more of a time resolution parameter in QT, not anything to do with speed of playback .


Time in QuickTime

Unlike most hardware-based media, QuickTime does not use a frame-based time system. Instead, QuickTime uses a system based on timescale and time values. Timescale is an integer value that indicates how many time values make up one second of a movie. By default, a new QuickTime movie has a timescale of 600—meaning that there are 600 time values per second.

Frame rate is determined by the concept of interesting time—times where the movie changes. If a movie changes every 40 time values, then it has an effective frame rate of 15 frames per second (since 600 divided by 40 equals 15). When Jitter determines how many frames are in a movie with the getframecount message, it scans the movie for interesting times, and reports their number. The frame and jump messages move the “play head” between different points of interesting time



Source
edit on 14-1-2019 by beetee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: beetee
I'm pretty bewildered by this, tbh, becuse there is a lot of very similar footage floating around, also shot from drones. Even the ufo looks similar.

Heh. I was just reminded that one evening I was watching some UFO stories on YouTube (Beyond Creepy, I think), when they were using some stock drone footage of a highway and a little white / yellow blob appears heading in the opposite direction. Maybe it was a bird, but it looked too compact, but it was gone in an instant. Less than a dozen frames, probably.

The funny thing was that it was just stock footage and wasn't even the UFO they were talking about in the story. It was just a random catch. I didn't go back and find it and freeze it (it's still out there, though) because what's the point?

Sometimes I wonder how many "real" UFOs are actually zipping through our stock footage and webcam images and being recorded, but they simply go unnoticed because people just aren't looking for them. All that talk people used to (and still, I guess) make about wanting cameras watching the skies all the time for UFOs leaves out the part where people actually have to sit down and spend tedious hours looking at all the damned footage afterwards to pick them out.
edit on 14-1-2019 by Blue Shift because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Interesting for sure.

Sorry if I missed it somewhere, but did they ever explain why they waited two years before showing this?



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 01:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Blue Shift

Yes. I certainly have a lot of photos and film I have barely glanced at... :-)



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Weagle

The original interview with the two guys who shot it alleges they were worried they had captured something on film that the shouldn"t have.

I took that as a belief it might be some kind of secret project.

The original upload in the OP has the interview, I think, or it is on the guys channel. The guy who published it on youtube got it from the film makers, who caught this shooting b-roll for another projct.
edit on 14-1-2019 by beetee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 14 2019 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Violater1
a reply to: vimanaboy

In this utube vid, it first appears to be a cylinder traveling upright or vertical. It then changes it's orientation, becomes horizontal, passes beneath the power lines, changes it's orientation again, and appears to be a cylinder coming at us head on.


I agree that it almost appears cylindrical. Kind of like the Stargate Atlantis Puddle Jumper





posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 12:27 AM
link   
One thing I have considered about the guy who released this video was perhaps he did so to drive traffic to his YouTube channel in the hopes of increasing his subs. While that would be a plausible scenario the problem is he is a huge Bernie Sanders supporter and huge advocate of progressive politics. He was also a progressive political reporter at one point.

I tend to find the majority of liberals don't believe in UFOs while conservatives and moderates tend to be more open to the possibility.

Most sightings have occurred in rural areas where skies are dark and people star gaze. Not the typical locale for liberals. My point being that if he were indeed trying to drive traffic to his YouTube channel then he's either ignorant of these facts or has posted what he considers to be legitimate UAP footage.

FWIW he hasn't increased his subs as a result of posting this video which as of this writing has over 200K views.

If it's CGI then it's damn good CGI. If you look closely at the most recent zoomed in footage where the UAP "appears" that particular location is a deep ridge line where perhaps the UAP first popped up making it seem as it just appeared when it could have been following the ridge line from a higher elevation while remaining out of sight.

I located the drone coordinates on Google Earth and measured the distance to the valley where the UAP first banked and it measures 3.2 miles exactly to the drone's location. It does travel that distance in 1 second. Technically less than one second.

That would put its approximate speed at 11,520 mph if we go with the 1 second calculation.

For arguments' sake lets say it's not CGI and agree it is a UAP. The next question is ours or theirs? I've heard the same tired argument for 20 years that we have secret tech capable of unimaginable performance. I don't believe it. Not THIS type of tech.

Ben Rich formerly of Skunk Works famously said, "We now have the technology to take ET home." But what he didn't say was, "we have BUILT the technology to take ET home." Big difference.

We need someone who is an expert in video image analysis who can look at the footage and offer quantitative proof proving it is either hoaxed or not. No one here knows for sure so until that person comes forward and provides a detailed analysis the rest of us are left with our unsubstantiated and meaningless opinions.



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 08:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: rejectHow close is this to the Sherman/skinwalker ranch?


More than 4 hours away.



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 10:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: MrSporkster

originally posted by: rejectHow close is this to the Sherman/skinwalker ranch?


More than 4 hours away.


How long if you were travelling 11k MPH? : )



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 11:23 AM
link   


Dae

posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: loam
Snowy Owl.

wildaboututah.org...


Owls are not built for speed, they are about flying quietly, silently in fact.

Plus I detect not a hint of wing movement, and dear god! How much does it look like the puddle jumper? (see vimanaboy's post above)



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join