It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: olaru12
Why being civil is both morally and strategically the right way to have political discourse
Who cares about morality or the right way to have a political discourse.
Me. And so should everyone who wants to be more effective in getting people to agree with their thoughts.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Grambler
You sir, are just a better person than I am.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: olaru12
Why being civil is both morally and strategically the right way to have political discourse
Who cares about morality or the right way to have a political discourse.
Me. And so should everyone who wants to be more effective in getting people to agree with their thoughts.
You are in a decided minority. Most want to WIN and rub their opponents face in the dirt. And it's going to get worse, much worse as the political parties start bringing out the candidates. I don't think I've seen it ever this bad and no one really cares...except you.
I've resigned myself that it's the ATS.
originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: Grambler
I think that you are perhaps missing the point.
Progressives (left and right) COUNT on a civil and polite society.
For instance, you can (and do) generate OPs pointing out the hypocrisy of the left.
The left doesn't care.
In fact, the left glories in being hypocritical. They are not ashamed by it, they see it as a weapon to be used.
After all, it allows them to accomplish things that otherwise cannot be done in a civil and polite society.
You are assuming that through civil discourse you can change a Progressive's mind about something.
You can't... because you are attempting to debate people that don't care about morality or ethics or being polite. They have a goal... you to them are misinformed and in the way.
At the end of the day, there is a very real sociopolitical struggle going on right now for the future identity of America.
The main front of that war is the internet... words are the weapons.
And you are bringing the verbal equivalent of a wiffle bat to the front line.
I do admire your persistence in what you do and how you approach it, but at the end of the day you are being a nice guy.
And contrary to the old saying, nice guys don't finish last.
They don't finish the race at all... they are kneecapped by their opponents at the first place on the track that the judges can't see the contestants.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
a reply to: Grambler
So... calling the President a Mother @#$#@ while threatening to impeach him, multiple times, where would that fall? Civil, or uncivil? Asking for a friend.
originally posted by: Grambler
So here is another thread that sort of illustartes the point I am trying to make.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
A right wing politician in Germany beaten and nearly killed in what police are calling a politically motivated attack.
Now if you are a left wing person who dilslikes this person, I am sure you immediately understand how this violence will gain sympathy for the right wing party, and bring scrutiny on the left wing parties that may have insulted him or called him out.
We all know this on a visceral level.
That is why civility is more effective.