It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: chuchas
The launcher was only in Ukraine for one day. The only aircraft downed on that day was MH-17.
originally posted by: chuchas
Here's list of Ukraine air force losses over Donbas between May and July 2014.
en.wikipedia.org...
Personally, I hold Malaysia airlines responsible. No other airline fly over a hot war zone, especially knowing both sides are very poorly soldiers. Why did they do that? Glad to see Malaysia airlines going down because of their behavior.
37 airlines continued overflying eastern Ukraine and about 900 flights crossed the Donetsk region in the seven days before the Boeing 777 was shot down
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuchas
Here's list of Ukraine air force losses over Donbas between May and July 2014.
en.wikipedia.org...
Personally, I hold Malaysia airlines responsible. No other airline fly over a hot war zone, especially knowing both sides are very poorly soldiers. Why did they do that? Glad to see Malaysia airlines going down because of their behavior.
Malaysia wasn't the only airline to fly over that region. Hundreds of airliners crossed over in the week prior to MH17 being shot down.
37 airlines continued overflying eastern Ukraine and about 900 flights crossed the Donetsk region in the seven days before the Boeing 777 was shot down
Wiki MH17 Link
See the MH17 Preliminary report to see other airliners in the vicinity of MH17.
MH17 Preliminary Report Link
originally posted by: Carcharadon
Wasn't Putin's plane in the vicinity around that time?
I remember reading theories on this being an attempted hit on him but the missile hit MH17 instead.
Anybody else remember that by chance?
originally posted by: chuka
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuchas
Here's list of Ukraine air force losses over Donbas between May and July 2014.
en.wikipedia.org...
Personally, I hold Malaysia airlines responsible. No other airline fly over a hot war zone, especially knowing both sides are very poorly soldiers. Why did they do that? Glad to see Malaysia airlines going down because of their behavior.
Malaysia wasn't the only airline to fly over that region. Hundreds of airliners crossed over in the week prior to MH17 being shot down.
37 airlines continued overflying eastern Ukraine and about 900 flights crossed the Donetsk region in the seven days before the Boeing 777 was shot down
Wiki MH17 Link
See the MH17 Preliminary report to see other airliners in the vicinity of MH17.
MH17 Preliminary Report Link
They flew over non battle areas of eastern Ukraine. Only Malaysia airlines flew over war zone. So they paid the price.
2.4.3 Airspace restrictions. At the time of the occurrence, flight MH17 was flying through the Dnipropertrovs'k (UDDV) FIR in the eastern part of the Ukraine. UkSATSE had issued NOTAMs that restricted access to the airspace below FL320 in the southern part of the FIR due to hostilities between armed groups and Ukrainian armed forces.
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuka
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuchas
Here's list of Ukraine air force losses over Donbas between May and July 2014.
en.wikipedia.org...
Personally, I hold Malaysia airlines responsible. No other airline fly over a hot war zone, especially knowing both sides are very poorly soldiers. Why did they do that? Glad to see Malaysia airlines going down because of their behavior.
Malaysia wasn't the only airline to fly over that region. Hundreds of airliners crossed over in the week prior to MH17 being shot down.
37 airlines continued overflying eastern Ukraine and about 900 flights crossed the Donetsk region in the seven days before the Boeing 777 was shot down
Wiki MH17 Link
See the MH17 Preliminary report to see other airliners in the vicinity of MH17.
MH17 Preliminary Report Link
They flew over non battle areas of eastern Ukraine. Only Malaysia airlines flew over war zone. So they paid the price.
Incorrect. Airlines continued to fly over the region and used the exact same upper air routes and various way points flown by MH17. The restrictions placed on them was altitude only. As long as the airlines filed flight plans that kept them above 32,000 feet then they were free to transit the region. That included flights transiting from Russian airspace to Ukrainian and vice versa.
2.4.3 Airspace restrictions. At the time of the occurrence, flight MH17 was flying through the Dnipropertrovs'k (UDDV) FIR in the eastern part of the Ukraine. UkSATSE had issued NOTAMs that restricted access to the airspace below FL320 in the southern part of the FIR due to hostilities between armed groups and Ukrainian armed forces.
From
MH17 Preliminary Report Link
As long as the airlines filed flight plans that didn't take them below 32,000 feet all airlines were permitted to fly over any part of the Flight Information Region. Hundreds of airliners crossed over that region with the only limitation being altitude. None of the upper air routes or way points were off limits.
originally posted by: chuka
That was irresponsible behavior. Missiles don't have IFF. They go after anything they can. Even friendly fighter jets.
The 9S35 Fire Dome provides a limited search and acquisition capability, a tracking capability and CW illumination for terminal guidance of the semi-active homing SAM seekers. It incorporates an IFF interrogator, optical tracker, datalink, and is powered by the TELAR's gas turbine generator.
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuka
That was irresponsible behavior. Missiles don't have IFF. They go after anything they can. Even friendly fighter jets.
The Buk TELAR unit itself carries an IFF interrogator as part of the Fire Dome radar. Of course the operator can choose to disable it.
The 9S35 Fire Dome provides a limited search and acquisition capability, a tracking capability and CW illumination for terminal guidance of the semi-active homing SAM seekers. It incorporates an IFF interrogator, optical tracker, datalink, and is powered by the TELAR's gas turbine generator.
Link
originally posted by: chukas
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuka
That was irresponsible behavior. Missiles don't have IFF. They go after anything they can. Even friendly fighter jets.
The Buk TELAR unit itself carries an IFF interrogator as part of the Fire Dome radar. Of course the operator can choose to disable it.
The 9S35 Fire Dome provides a limited search and acquisition capability, a tracking capability and CW illumination for terminal guidance of the semi-active homing SAM seekers. It incorporates an IFF interrogator, optical tracker, datalink, and is powered by the TELAR's gas turbine generator.
Link
Commercial airliners don't have IFF. Even if MH17 was not targeted by the TELAR, the missile could have targeted it by itself as long as MH17 was illuminated by ground radar. This is the point of semi active radar homing. Missiles go after anything that is illuminated. That's why F-22 and F-35 have internal gun to dogfight in case AMRAAM goes after friendly planes illuminated by radar. Missiles don't have IFF. They target friendly planes too.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: chukas
originally posted by: tommyjo
originally posted by: chuka
That was irresponsible behavior. Missiles don't have IFF. They go after anything they can. Even friendly fighter jets.
The Buk TELAR unit itself carries an IFF interrogator as part of the Fire Dome radar. Of course the operator can choose to disable it.
The 9S35 Fire Dome provides a limited search and acquisition capability, a tracking capability and CW illumination for terminal guidance of the semi-active homing SAM seekers. It incorporates an IFF interrogator, optical tracker, datalink, and is powered by the TELAR's gas turbine generator.
Link
Commercial airliners don't have IFF. Even if MH17 was not targeted by the TELAR, the missile could have targeted it by itself as long as MH17 was illuminated by ground radar. This is the point of semi active radar homing. Missiles go after anything that is illuminated. That's why F-22 and F-35 have internal gun to dogfight in case AMRAAM goes after friendly planes illuminated by radar. Missiles don't have IFF. They target friendly planes too.
Actually they DO have a IFF in all military aircraft the US flys. The radar ID's the targets. the IFF signal then declares it a Friendly or enemy. AMRAAM is not totally fire and forget. it requires ACTIVE radar. The shoodown of the Blackhawks in Iraq was from improper IFF usage and failure to ID correctly. ANd SOrry a fighter isnt shooting down a missile with a machine gun. This isnt ace combat.
originally posted by: chukas
Buk hit MH17. True. But it is unlikely the target of the Buk crew was MH17.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: chukas
Buk hit MH17. True. But it is unlikely the target of the Buk crew was MH17.
There're several posts erroneously explaining how SAMs work, specially the BUK system that shot down MH17. The way the BUK system is deployed is described in the Dutch Safety Board's report that was published in October 2015. Essentially, MH17 was selected as the target by the launchers Target Acquisition Radar, which was then tracked. Once in range a missile was launched at MH17. The airliner was not an accidental target as it was deliberately targeted.
MH17 Report - see page 133
originally posted by: chukas
Once a missile is fired, you have no control which plane it will go after.
If you think Russia deliberately shot down MH17 you might as well say Syria deliberately shot down Il-20M. The Dutch report doesn't prove anything. It needs a confession from Russia to prove it.
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: chukas
Once a missile is fired, you have no control which plane it will go after.
That's not true at all with the Buk missile system.
If you think Russia deliberately shot down MH17 you might as well say Syria deliberately shot down Il-20M. The Dutch report doesn't prove anything. It needs a confession from Russia to prove it.
The evidence shows that a Russian launcher was used. Who pulled the trigger is not known. Whether MH17 was deliberately or mistakenly targeted is unknown as Russia has not allowed suspects to be interviewed. However, the aircraft that turned out to be an airliner was targeted.