It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
What a falsehood. They're criminals if they want to get in they will find a way. Same logic as banning guns. Only thing is, it's just going to create more crime. You know, human trafficking and more crime along the boarder.
The point of it isnt to stop ALL of them, the point is to stem the tide, the Falsehood is all these anti-wall people making the false-premise that we want the wall to stop EVERYTHING.
We are well aware that you can never stop everyone. I read the other day from another poster that we spend 100s of billions of dollars on health care alone every year on illegals and thats just who we know about.
If we stemmed the tide to just stopping 15-20 percent of thsoe people coming in the wall will pay for itself in two years, but thats just HEALTHCARE alone, not all the other programs that are funneling money to compensate for illegals , including taking up space in jails, deportation, HOLDING them like were having to do right now with these caravans. Etc Etc ad nauseum
its clear to see that even at a LOW percentage of stopping the influx, will save us hundreds of billions in less that 5 years.
Billions that can go into programs to help the vets, revamp healthcare, etc etc etc, you know facilitate programs that ALL Americans want.
Anti-wall people arent using common sense and are knee jerking with emotion, they arent looking at the numbers, or the long game
Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell.
Anyone that vehemently opposed to border security has to have an ulterior motive for their position.
Oh and dont forget about all of the UNDERAGE sex abuse victims they would lose access to. That's probably the most important facet of the whole thing.
I dunno man, you seem to have a vociferous and suspiciously keen knowledge of underage sex abuse trafficking.......
Why is that? Because I read sources other than Vox and HuffPo and know the reality that's happening on the border?
If you want open borders just man up and admit the real reason you want a steady flow of untraceable poor brown women and children.
I'm not the one advocating for it. You and your ilk are. Just own it.
Hell if you play your cards right you might be able to get your article in the next HuffPo "Not all pedophiles are bad" issue.
Own what, that you probably have dabbled in sex trafficking yourself already, and this whole charade is just projection and misdirection away from yourself? I don't see why should own that about you.....
I'm not the one advocating open borders Podesta. You are.
Nice deflection though.
Nobody is advocating open borders
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
Own what, that you probably have dabbled in sex trafficking yourself already
I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
originally posted by: SailorJerry
The poster never accused you of such heinous acts, again your statement was disgusting and exposes your character.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
I did say that yes. But it wasn't directed at any one person and I didnt single any specific person out.
You did.
Why do you assume it's just leftists?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
I did say that yes. But it wasn't directed at any one person and I didnt single any specific person out.
You did.
Why do you assume it's just leftists?
Lol, can you even hear yourself? Again, you can refute yourself far better than I can, "Your average leftist in a nutshell."
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
It's about screwing the people who devote their lives to working in government.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
It's about screwing the people who devote their lives to working in government.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Thats basically what he's asking for $5 Billion so he can turn round to his supporters and say he is still "winning", this is just to score political points.
So when you look at it like this you realise something very important, the government is in shut down not over $5 Billion but basically as a big F you to Trump
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
I did say that yes. But it wasn't directed at any one person and I didnt single any specific person out.
You did.
Why do you assume it's just leftists?
Lol, can you even hear yourself? Again, you can refute yourself far better than I can, "Your average leftist in a nutshell."
And no I can't "hear" myself. I'm typing on a phone not speaking out loud.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
I did say that yes. But it wasn't directed at any one person and I didnt single any specific person out.
You did.
Why do you assume it's just leftists?
Lol, can you even hear yourself? Again, you can refute yourself far better than I can, "Your average leftist in a nutshell."
And no I can't "hear" myself. I'm typing on a phone not speaking out loud.
Ah, this all makes sense now.
I'll have to explain this really simply I see: Its an expression of speech, you see. I'm not actually inquiring if you can auditorily detect your own voice......
But thanks for clearing up why you are unable to grasp your own idiocy.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: Wayfarer
No, just Triggered. Its not that complicated of a concept.
You literally just accused another poster of being involved in sex trafficking, I hope other posters see this so they can understand the kind of though process you employ, and understand to take everything you say with a grain of very very skeptical salt.
Sailor Jerry with the salt quip! Top Notch
and if we're being accurate here I merely shoveled his own horsecrap back into his own mouth, tit-for-tat and whatnot.
I never said or accused anyone specifically.
To quote you:
"Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell. "
Yeah, I guess its ok if you call out ALL leftists as rapists, as long as you don't call out just one person. /rolleyes
I did say that yes. But it wasn't directed at any one person and I didnt single any specific person out.
You did.
Why do you assume it's just leftists?
Lol, can you even hear yourself? Again, you can refute yourself far better than I can, "Your average leftist in a nutshell."
And no I can't "hear" myself. I'm typing on a phone not speaking out loud.
Ah, this all makes sense now.
I'll have to explain this really simply I see: Its an expression of speech, you see. I'm not actually inquiring if you can auditorily detect your own voice......
But thanks for clearing up why you are unable to grasp your own idiocy.
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha
What a falsehood. They're criminals if they want to get in they will find a way. Same logic as banning guns. Only thing is, it's just going to create more crime. You know, human trafficking and more crime along the boarder.
The point of it isnt to stop ALL of them, the point is to stem the tide, the Falsehood is all these anti-wall people making the false-premise that we want the wall to stop EVERYTHING.
We are well aware that you can never stop everyone. I read the other day from another poster that we spend 100s of billions of dollars on health care alone every year on illegals and thats just who we know about.
If we stemmed the tide to just stopping 15-20 percent of thsoe people coming in the wall will pay for itself in two years, but thats just HEALTHCARE alone, not all the other programs that are funneling money to compensate for illegals , including taking up space in jails, deportation, HOLDING them like were having to do right now with these caravans. Etc Etc ad nauseum
its clear to see that even at a LOW percentage of stopping the influx, will save us hundreds of billions in less that 5 years.
Billions that can go into programs to help the vets, revamp healthcare, etc etc etc, you know facilitate programs that ALL Americans want.
Anti-wall people arent using common sense and are knee jerking with emotion, they arent looking at the numbers, or the long game
Anyone against the wall is pro slavery for corporate profits and pro human and sex trafficking.
End of story.
They enjoy the steady flow of poor brown people to be slaves and sex abuse victims. Your average leftist in a nutshell.
Anyone that vehemently opposed to border security has to have an ulterior motive for their position.
Oh and dont forget about all of the UNDERAGE sex abuse victims they would lose access to. That's probably the most important facet of the whole thing.
I dunno man, you seem to have a vociferous and suspiciously keen knowledge of underage sex abuse trafficking.......
Why is that? Because I read sources other than Vox and HuffPo and know the reality that's happening on the border?
If you want open borders just man up and admit the real reason you want a steady flow of untraceable poor brown women and children.
I'm not the one advocating for it. You and your ilk are. Just own it.
Hell if you play your cards right you might be able to get your article in the next HuffPo "Not all pedophiles are bad" issue.
Own what, that you probably have dabbled in sex trafficking yourself already, and this whole charade is just projection and misdirection away from yourself? I don't see why should own that about you.....
I'm not the one advocating open borders Podesta. You are.
Nice deflection though.
Nobody is advocating open borders
Plenty of people are actually.