It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MM, in the Glenn Campbell article you linked (thanks not read it before) one of the theories is that Bigelow wiped his 275K bankruptcy. Any evidence of that, or did he end up gong through with being bankrupt?
June 11, 1993:
Daily Variety, an entertainment industry newspaper reports “New Line Nabs Pic Based on Gov’t UFO Scientist”. Excerpts from the story: “The life story of former U.S. government scientist Bob Lazar that was recently put into turnaround by Gruber-Peters Prods. has been put on an earthly fast track by New Line Cinema...
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: mirageman
That’s not a good record of Lazar. It confirms everything Friedman says and more.
There are things in there I wouldn’t even repeat here.
This is even worse
Looking at the Bob Lazar story from the perspective of 2018
But ufology wastes time on the more 'entertaining cases'. Like I said earlier in the thread I am sure that given enough time and resources the Lazar and Walton cases could have been resolved beyond reasonable doubt.
"In March 1978, DoE Information Officer David F. Miller received an information request from Bob Stoldal, news director for KLAS-TV. Stoldal was seeking information about alleged "serious security leaks" regarding a classified airplane being operated on the Nellis Range. One of these "leaks" was the information that "Area 51 was a secret Air Force installation that has been hiding behind the NTS for years."
Miller told Stoldal that "any information about Area 51 would have to come from the Pentagon." Stoldal proceeded with his "expose" of Area 51, claiming later that "informed sources" told him that a tape of his broadcast was studied by the government and that his phone had been tapped."
originally posted by: Jay-morris
And yet you throw false accusations and assumptions on the Travis case regarding the other crew members, completly ignoring my points that do not fit your beliefs. Not good!
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: Jay-morris
I brought up the lie detectors to imply that he's lying.
I don't know for sure tho. But you are right, it was me trying to instill distrust in what they say.
Ignoring Lazar's tests is a great example of my biases.
Do you think it's possible I've done my research and come to a different conclusion?
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: Jay-morris
You're a bit over-excitable when people don't conform to your beliefs. But I don't know what you are going on about now? I didn't throw false accusations at anyone? I made a point related to a phrase that Stanton Friedman (a guy you've admitted you admire in this thread) often uses. That is that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". Which I assume you agree is valid as you admire Friedman? Or maybe you don't? I don't know.
Much of the case is anecdotal. What people think they have seen and what they actually saw could be completely different. What about the lack of ketones in Walton's system when he returned? He said he was given no food or water?