It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: soundguy
I hate what it has become, but its not a right or left wing thing, both parties have used it and abused it for personal gain and I wish we could see a court case that destroys the current standard for whats considered acceptable use.
originally posted by: soundguy
Wow that’s pretty cool. Sounds like a really nice place, if you can deal with the winters, or is it a summer type place? Around where I live we have/had a similar set up. Leased land. You are as empowered as the lease papers say you are.. a reply to: mysterioustranger
originally posted by: notsure1
originally posted by: soundguy
Actually it’s called a right of way, you effectively own it, but they have the “right of way.” And no they can’t do”whatever they want” within that space. It’s generally granted for roads and utilities. When a development is platted. In many cases that land will be returned, unencumbered to the property owner, if abandoned. reply to: notsure1
have you ever owned a house?
Its called an easement .
And no they can’t do”whatever they want” within that space. It’s generally granted for roads and utilities.
LMAO what are they gonna put a tiny house on it?
They can put a sidewalk there or they can expand the road . or work on the sewage system . They can do whatever the eff they want.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: soundguy
I really think you nailed some of the hypocrisy on the head
This and "civil asset forfeiture" which is a government theft program have got to go.
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: soundguy
I really think you nailed some of the hypocrisy on the head
When it comes to border security we're talking about legitimate need. Not all eminent domain is bad. I just think it's bad when they hand private property over to corporations to develop for a profit and give nothing back to the communities they take from.
originally posted by: soundguy
More specifically, Eminent domain? I hear very little talk about the property owners that will be affected but trumps proposed wall. Sorrry about their luck? Or, does the greater good outweigh a single individuals rights? A very socialistic idea in my opinion. And while I’m thinking a about it. Who should be the arbiter on such matters? Is this a states rights matter? Should the fed be allowed to override the state, or the local government? And one last thought. Where do you draw the line on intrusion into you life by others, government or corporate? Or do you even have a line? Well, besides gunz?
Happy new year!
originally posted by: toysforadults
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: soundguy
I really think you nailed some of the hypocrisy on the head
When it comes to border security we're talking about legitimate need. Not all eminent domain is bad. I just think it's bad when they hand private property over to corporations to develop for a profit and give nothing back to the communities they take from.
so you need to sacrifice your land for the greater good?
guess the OP was right...
originally posted by: projectvxn
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: soundguy
I really think you nailed some of the hypocrisy on the head
When it comes to border security we're talking about legitimate need. Not all eminent domain is bad. I just think it's bad when they hand private property over to corporations to develop for a profit and give nothing back to the communities they take from.
so you need to sacrifice your land for the greater good?
guess the OP was right...