It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Where do right wingers stand on property rights?

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:12 PM
link   
More specifically, Eminent domain? I hear very little talk about the property owners that will be affected but trumps proposed wall. Sorrry about their luck? Or, does the greater good outweigh a single individuals rights? A very socialistic idea in my opinion. And while I’m thinking a about it. Who should be the arbiter on such matters? Is this a states rights matter? Should the fed be allowed to override the state, or the local government? And one last thought. Where do you draw the line on intrusion into you life by others, government or corporate? Or do you even have a line? Well, besides gunz?

Happy new year!
edit on 1-1-2019 by soundguy because: (no reason given)



+15 more 
posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: soundguy
More specifically, imminent domain? I hear very little talk about the property owners that will be affected but trumps proposed wall. Sorrry about their luck? Or, does the greater good outweigh a single individuals rights? A very socialistic idea in my opinion. And while I’m thinking a about it. Who should be the arbiter on such matters? Is this a states rights matter? Should the fed be allowed to override the state, or the local government? And one last thought. Where do you draw the line on intrusion into you life by others, government or corporate? Or do you even have a line? Well, besides gunz?

Happy new year!


Everywhere I have ever lived you never actually own the last 6 feet or so of you property . It is always owned by the city so they can do whatever they want there,

And that was before Trump ever even thought of running for POTUS but I bet you still blame him for it.
edit on 1-1-2019 by notsure1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: notsure1


People's property lines don't end at the border. A lot of Texas ranchers, for example, have lands that straddle the border significantly on both sides of the border.


+30 more 
posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:18 PM
link   
a reply to: soundguy

Don't know. Where do illegal immigrants stand on property rights?



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: soundguy
More specifically, imminent domain?

"Imminent" means "in the very near future". 2019 has been imminent since Christmas, and has now arrived.
I suppose you mean "eminent"?



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: soundguy
More specifically, imminent domain? I hear very little talk about the property owners that will be affected but trumps proposed wall. Sorrry about their luck? Or, does the greater good outweigh a single individuals rights? A very socialistic idea in my opinion. And while I’m thinking a about it. Who should be the arbiter on such matters? Is this a states rights matter? Should the fed be allowed to override the state, or the local government? And one last thought. Where do you draw the line on intrusion into you life by others, government or corporate? Or do you even have a line? Well, besides gunz?

Happy new year!


Relating to topic: I have a log cabin cottage in Amish country, Mio, Michigan.

It sits in the United States Huron National Forest on gov. land. I pay taxes on the cottage, yet the U.S. gov. owns all the land in, under and around it...and have 100% say in it's management.

Not me..



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:25 PM
link   
Actually it’s called a right of way, you effectively own it, but they have the “right of way.” And no they can’t do”whatever they want” within that space. It’s generally granted for roads and utilities. When a development is platted. In many cases that land will be returned, unencumbered to the property owner, if abandoned. reply to: notsure1



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:26 PM
link   
Don’t know don’t care. I care about Americans rights. a reply to: Blueracer



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:33 PM
link   
Yeah, I know what each word means. I updated my post. Do you actually have an opinion to offer up on the matter? a reply to: DISRAELI



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:38 PM
link   
Wow that’s pretty cool. Sounds like a really nice place, if you can deal with the winters, or is it a summer type place? Around where I live we have/had a similar set up. Leased land. You are as empowered as the lease papers say you are.. a reply to: mysterioustranger



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Blueracer
a reply to: soundguy

Don't know. Where do illegal immigrants stand on property rights?



Same place as left wing nutjobs.
Your property belongs to whoever ‘feels’ that they ‘need’ it more than you do.



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Just for myself, If I lived on land that illegal immigrants were coming onto all the time, I'd have to say, come build it.
But then I would want a wall/fence anywhere I lived, if I had to worry about people coming on my land all the time, without permission.

Isn't that called trespassing?



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:51 PM
link   
if it comes down to it i bet for the right price mexico would sell us the extra 10 feet

also the goverment can simply take your land you think you own land .... last time i checked you dont pay rent "tax" on things you "own" and no one for any price can take something you own nether are true with land

try and change ether law and see how that works for you



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:52 PM
link   
We lived in AZ for several years. Casa Grande was (at the time) being consumed by illegals. We moved up to Apache Junction after several people tried to break into our house. MANY TIMES.

At the wally world, parents would drop off their kids who would run around yanking crap off the shelves and the workers went behind them trying to clean up. You could not shop there without having them run into you constantly.

Most of the people who were interviewed on local TV DEMANDED a solution.

Take the land. Build the damn wall. Save this country before its too late.

Fred..



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: soundguy
Actually it’s called a right of way, you effectively own it, but they have the “right of way.” And no they can’t do”whatever they want” within that space. It’s generally granted for roads and utilities. When a development is platted. In many cases that land will be returned, unencumbered to the property owner, if abandoned. reply to: notsure1



have you ever owned a house?

Its called an easement .


And no they can’t do”whatever they want” within that space. It’s generally granted for roads and utilities.


LMAO what are they gonna put a tiny house on it?

They can put a sidewalk there or they can expand the road . or work on the sewage system . They can do whatever the eff they want.



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 01:01 PM
link   
Yeah, high density housing will have that effect on communities. Short sighted people don’t participate in local politics, buy into programming, and the next thing you know, they think low income apartment complexes will bring jobs. Duh? I’ve been vexed for years. People accept Walmart’s as a way of life. I’m sorry you live that way. Tragic. a reply to: fredrodgers1960



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Lol



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: soundguy

I hate what it has become, but its not a right or left wing thing, both parties have used it and abused it for personal gain and I wish we could see a court case that destroys the current standard for whats considered acceptable use.



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: soundguy

They won't care one way or the other... it won't affect their property one bit.



posted on Jan, 1 2019 @ 01:15 PM
link   
If I owned property that shared a border with Mexico . I would want a wall.

I bet most of the people that do own that property want a wall too. I am sure they all already have a fence , why wouldnt they want a wall?

Except for the REEEstralians




top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join