It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


i think the 1969 moon landings were done in a movie studio

page: 8
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 02:21 PM
a reply to: DoctorBluechip

it's called mental cognition .

As opposed to other sorts of cognition?

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 02:30 PM
a reply to: Phage


posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 02:46 PM
a reply to: DoctorBluechip

Yes, it is irrefutable. This isn't science, it is, at best, pseudo-science.

Yes, I will stick it out to the bitter end, because I'm right, you and yours are, very plainly to everyone save you, wrong.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 02:56 PM
a reply to: seagull

That milk is white - that is irrefutable : only the plainly obtuse would disagree with that .

That the US President could phone up to the moon in 1969 - that's laughable . You got the wrong word

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 03:11 PM
a reply to: DoctorBluechip

Mission Control in Houston had a radio communication with the Apollo capsule as well as the Moon lander. A phone connection between the White House and Ground Control was established and connected to the radio transmitter and receiver. Of course the Deep Space Network with its three large antenna stations in Goldstone, Madrid and Canberra had to be used. To connect the overseas DSN stations to Houston, existing submarine communications cables and communications satellites like Early Bird were used.

Someone in Houston had to switch the transmitters and receivers for uplink when the President was speaking and for downlink when the astronauts were speaking. Of course the assistance of the personel at the DSN stations was needed to control the antenna direction and the power transmitters and high gain/low noise receivers at the dishes.

Continous speech connection between ground control and Apollo was necessary for the whole mission. Telephone connection to the White House was the easiest part.


It's called the Deep Space Network. They used really massive dish antennas [Google Photos].

Like the satellite TV antenna, but with a bowl as big as a football field!

Massive 34 meter and 70 meter antennas -- 100 footer and 200 footer dishes. Transmitting and receiving everything like sending space probe commands & receiving pictures and science data.

You can watch the Deep Space Network (DSN) transmissions at:

Real-time animated status of all the big antennas that the Deep Space Network (DSN) is using. It's fascinating, hypnotizing and mesmerizing.

The dishes are still in use today. The exact same big antenna that handled the phone call & live TV broadcast from the moon, now is used in receiving pretty pictures from the Mars Rovers.

First call to the moon 1969

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 03:48 PM
a reply to: dojozen

Well yeah , but also people start to wake up... fakenews wasn't common knowledge 50 years ago.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:21 PM
a reply to: dojozen

oh FFS - piss off - if you REALLY cannot foind documentation of the apollo moon flags in google - then .......................

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:43 PM
a reply to: RedRobbin

Although many mock. Some understand. If you spend enough time looking you will work out that the moon landings where faked. We cannot get through the Van Allen Radiation Belt to start with.

No one has been back to the moon. All these years later. That in itself says something. Kubrick filmed the moon landing hoax. Watch the film the Shinning and do some research. He admits it within the film.

It was a hoax to baffle the Russians. Just like Roswell. All these years later people just follow without scrutinisation.

Flag and star

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:50 PM
a reply to: neutronflux

And not a single piece of evidence from you the moon landings were shot from a studio. Talking about the jumper. You don’t get kids want to be astronauts? You have to glaze over a basic truth to create innuendo? What kid with immigration doesn’t dream of exploring space? And a kid wearing a jumper is not any proof of a broadcast coming from a studio. It’s call innuendo, with no supporting evidence. Do you have actual evidence?

Maybe you could try studying the evidence presented before passing comment. It is a fault in debate not to be able to see the opposing view. Regardless if you agree or disagree.

There is evidence out there if you choose to look. You prefer to pass comment without checking the information first.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:53 PM
a reply to: Zaphod58

would think a moon colony be nice to have, in case ever needed a bug out planet...

Did you read the one about the guy who has been selling acre lots on the moon?

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:54 PM

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: seattlerat

Can you state actual evidence the moon landings were shot in a studio. Or just the same old arguments repeatedly debunked?

See the stage figure in the visor reflection.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 04:56 PM

originally posted by: notsure1
I used to be 100% sure we went to the moon.

Now I see how easily we are manipulated even though we know all bout CGI and hoax videos.

They could have faked it and showed it to us on TV and we would have believed it as long as they told us it was true.

I still think we went but doubts have crept in.

They where models. Study Kubrick if you want to understand the truth. He wanted the world to know what happened and left plenty of clues.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:00 PM
a reply to: dojozen

And it would be a disaster without the technology we are still developing to do it. It's not as simple as just putting a few landers on the moon with connecting tubes between them. Contrary to what Elon Musk seems to think about a trip to Mars, radiation is going to be a serious issue long term, and protecting against it is going to be a very different prospect than on earth.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:03 PM
There's technology to have a moonbase, even tech to go to Mars, but the cost not just financially, but the cost to human life is far too high.

Think about maritime explorers who were going to the 'new word', the ships where there to do it, but many of the sailors, sometimes all of them, died at sea. Not like now where transatlantic maritime travel is incredibly safe.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:17 PM
Stopped reading around page 5 but all in all, it looks like people want to see proof. Proof that we landed or proof that we didn't - in 1969 - the way they said it happened.

There is no proof either way.
There is the REAL story that only a handful of astronauts and their superiors really know what the real deal is.
Everything else is the official story.
There is so much evidence leaning towards staging and what not and there is so much evidence that something really happened.
There will never be "proof". Never. This will ALWAYS be conjecture.

So F your proof. Get over it.

I BELIEVE that something is seriously wrong with the official story.

I don't care about your various maths. (See sentence #4)

So, are any of the original astronauts from the 1969 Apollo Mission here on this thread? If so, can we ask you a few serious questions?

edit on 27-12-2018 by EmmanuelGoldstein because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:48 PM
a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

There's plenty of proof man went to the Moon in 1969. You've just chosen to ignore it.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:51 PM
We went

The End

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 05:54 PM

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 06:38 PM

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: DoctorBluechip

Read this, or not, as you choose.

posted on Dec, 27 2018 @ 07:43 PM
Posts like this are ridiculous, scrambled and have no context. They often have spelling mistakes and bad grammar. Not doing a very good job of convincing me.

new topics

top topics

<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in