It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now Marrs has allied with the web's most popular conspiracy forum to investigate everything from chemtrails to the Nazis' Antarctic base, moon landing hoaxes to UFOs, God as an alien to the end of the world in 2012.
Of course, the whole controversy could be firmly settled once and for all if an Earth-based telescope could focus on the areas of the Moon where NASA maintains its lunar modules landed-and still remain to this day-and photograph them.
originally posted by: RedRobbin
i am getting tired of all you people posting in my thread, does anyone have above top secrets book from 2008 . which stated the video was flawed with actual science. i am going to get it even if it takes three weeks cause of spite. if your some idiot who cant see between the lines, dont bother posting.
Adam Ruins Everything Explains Why the Moon Landing Couldn’t Have Been Faked
www.themarysue.com...
Adam and his cast explain that the tech needed to fake the landing pictures a) did not exist in the 60s and b) would have cost more to fake than actually just landing men on the moon. Not to mention that a hoax of this magnitude would have required a massive conspiracy of silence from the thousands of people involved in the missions, plus the governments of the world that confirmed picking up the moon broadcast from space and had nothing to gain by backing up the United States.
Why the Moon Landing COULDN'T Have Been Faked
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: olaru12
I wonder why we never established a base on the moon. Instead we got the lame space shuttle and an even more lame space station.
Trump should forge ahead with his "space force"....sorry that sound so silly!!
I believe NASA about as much as I believe any govt. agency....not much!