It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump agrees to shut down his charity

page: 4
12
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

In what way? Point out the hypocrisy. Im not the one complaining about corruption in one foundation and excusing it in another.




posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Propagandalf

So you still refuse to admit they're both corrupt foundations? Who's defending either one except you?


You're pretending they are the same. But it's like saying stealing a loaf of bread is the same as stealing millions. it's foolish to compare the two.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Propagandalf

So you still refuse to admit they're both corrupt foundations? Who's defending either one except you?



You're pretending they are the same. But it's like saying stealing a loaf of bread is the same as stealing millions. it's foolish to compare the two.


Stealing is bad, mmkay.

edit on 18-12-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

People who remain loyal to an obvious liar, fraud, and conman like Trump in light of clear evidence is in pretty bad shape.

You should free yourself from such dedication or loyalty to a certain fraud for your own good if you have any left.

Trump will lead you to hell

You could still keep your conservative values as many conservatives see what Trump truly is…demonic.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Boy, the Russian trolls sure are earning their overtime today eh.

I mean, I assume you're all getting paid for defending Donnie Moscow. If not, you should really get a job doing it, might as well get paid for your efforts.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: DBCowboy

In what way? Point out the hypocrisy. Im not the one complaining about corruption in one foundation and excusing it in another.


Actually you have been for months if not years.

Check yourself.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: DBCowboy

People who remain loyal to an obvious liar, fraud, and conman like Trump in light of clear evidence is in pretty bad shape.

You should free yourself from such dedication or loyalty to a certain fraud for your own good if you have any left.

Trump will lead you to hell

You could still keep your conservative values as many conservatives see what Trump truly is…demonic.



Everyone sucks in DC, why don't you pour glitter on your idols in the DNC and live life in bliss, 'kay?



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Propagandalf

So you still refuse to admit they're both corrupt foundations? Who's defending either one except you?



You're pretending they are the same. But it's like saying stealing a loaf of bread is the same as stealing millions. it's foolish to compare the two.


Stealing is bad, mmkay.


So is prosecuting the former while ignoring the latter.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

What happened to 'drain the swamp?'

Just accept that Trump is not the savior of the Republic that so many thought he was and move on. Stop supporting the stooge.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Propagandalf

They'r both stealing are they not? A thief is a thief.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: DBCowboy

What happened to 'drain the swamp?'

Just accept that Trump is not the savior of the Republic that so many thought he was and move on. Stop supporting the stooge.


Has any of these allegations occurred while he was a politician? Have any of them occurred in Washington?



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Where? Lol! You must be confusing me with someone else, either that or your propaganda has convinced you that anyone who disagrees with you is the same.
edit on 12/18/2018 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 05:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: DBCowboy

What happened to 'drain the swamp?'

Just accept that Trump is not the savior of the Republic that so many thought he was and move on. Stop supporting the stooge.


So many people have hitched their wagons to the wrong star. It's a fool's game.



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 12:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Propagandalf

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: DBCowboy

What happened to 'drain the swamp?'

Just accept that Trump is not the savior of the Republic that so many thought he was and move on. Stop supporting the stooge.


Has any of these allegations occurred while he was a politician? Have any of them occurred in Washington?


Interesting question.

However, if they are “criminal” actions by a charitable Foundation, which the ruling clearly indicates, then isn’t it important that the “rule of law” apply, no matter when the offenses occurred, as long as they are within the statute of limitations?

Why would him being a “politician” or not matter? Why is this relevant?



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: Knapperdude
I was under the impression that all foundations are tax shelters and money laundering for the ultra rich?


It is funny how the Clintons left office suggesting they were bankrupt at about 15 million in the red, and without doing much of anything but speeches and their charity they became super rich...250 million and more like 500 million counting what is not actually on the books.

I have come the the conclusion that the Clintons have found the perfect pay for play method...as example...


In total, the two gave 729 speeches from February 2001 until May 2016, receiving an average payday of $210,795 for each address.
This is even by CNN

Now add in their charity...lol




edit on 19-12-2018 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 08:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Propagandalf

You're not seriously suggesting he stopped being 'swampy' after he was elected are you? A political career suddenly made Trump the slumlord and guy-so-dumb-he-couldn't-make-a-casino-profitable a squeaky-clean president?

Trump may not be a murdering psycopath or a man hell-bent on destruction but he's absolutely a greedy white-collar crime kind of guy who uses mob tactics against his 'competitors.' He'd sell out his own family if it made somebody, somewhere think he was 'better' for it.



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 08:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Propagandalf

You're not seriously suggesting he stopped being 'swampy' after he was elected are you? A political career suddenly made Trump the slumlord and guy-so-dumb-he-couldn't-make-a-casino-profitable a squeaky-clean president?

Trump may not be a murdering psycopath or a man hell-bent on destruction but he's absolutely a greedy white-collar crime kind of guy who uses mob tactics against his 'competitors.' He'd sell out his own family if it made somebody, somewhere think he was 'better' for it.


No, i’m suggesting you are using his past business practices, some of them 30 years old, to criticize his present political career, as if “drain the swamp” applied to the New York real-estate industry and not politics in Washington.



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 09:10 AM
link   
High-level Comparison: TRUMP Foundation vs Clinton Foundation

Here: twitter.com...

Also, isn't the Clinton Foundation an un-registered FOREIGN AGENT, like General Flynn was?



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Propagandalf

I'm saying he never stopped using those business practices. He's the same bankrupt-loving, tax-evading, gold-plated-knock-off brand, womanizer he ever was. Electing him president did not change him, at all.

He was the swamp, he is the swamp and he will forever be the swamp despite his sycophants wishes otherwise.



posted on Dec, 19 2018 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: narrator

originally posted by: dothedew
a reply to: soundguy

I'm still standing firm on the idea that anyone intentionally spelling a name as "tRump" has no valid say or opinion in any matters involving the President.

I'm also searching for your equal opinion on the investigation into the Clinton Foundation... because fair is fair, right?


Then will you make the same ruling with people who say "Obummer" instead of Obama? And "Killary" instead of Hillary? And the countless stupid nicknames for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez? And "kiddie sniffer" for Joe Biden?

Just wondering how nonpartisan your judgement is.


Yes, as a matter of fact. The only people I've nicknamed were the Bush's... and even then, it wasn't necessarily a "nickname" per say, it was me referring to them as "Bloodthirsty little Demons".




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join