It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I proposed a simple solution. After a Narcan intervention, the doper is placed in an observation cell just long enough for a cold turkey withdrawal. The cell is lined with ceramic tile and has a floor drain for easy cleanup. When the happy doper is done puking and comes around, he/she is cleaned up, fed and sent on their way.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: pteridine
I proposed a simple solution. After a Narcan intervention, the doper is placed in an observation cell just long enough for a cold turkey withdrawal. The cell is lined with ceramic tile and has a floor drain for easy cleanup. When the happy doper is done puking and comes around, he/she is cleaned up, fed and sent on their way.
That sound incredibly expensive for taxpayers.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: DBCowboy
No, we live in a society.
So government should give away free livers to alcoholics?
Not everyone is well adjusted in this very sick society we live in, a little compassion is essential.
I think my post is all about compassion, I'm asking what about all those other people...? The whole reason I brought up this post is that I was in the store and witnessed a lady faint right in the aisle. I don't really know what happened to her. And I'm just assuming here, but I really wonder if she was having a diabetic episode. I've heard a lot about people lately skipping insulin, or trying to stretch it out since they just can't afford it. Then I see this article about a state just giving free overdose drugs out like candy. I'm in now way saying OD people don't deserve to be rescued, but what about everyone else with very similar life threatening problems.
originally posted by: pteridine
So these selfish dopers keep tying up resources while those that are injured or having a medical emergency have to wait. I proposed a simple solution. After a Narcan intervention, the doper is placed in an observation cell just long enough for a cold turkey withdrawal. The cell is lined with ceramic tile and has a floor drain for easy cleanup. When the happy doper is done puking and comes around, he/she is cleaned up, fed and sent on their way.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
Why are we assuming that being saved from a drug overdose is the best thing for these people? Perhaps death is better as it ends the misery that they must be in to get to that point in the first place.
Perhaps we need to rethink our peritanucal views of death. It's not always such a bad thing.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
originally posted by: pteridine
So these selfish dopers keep tying up resources while those that are injured or having a medical emergency have to wait. I proposed a simple solution. After a Narcan intervention, the doper is placed in an observation cell just long enough for a cold turkey withdrawal. The cell is lined with ceramic tile and has a floor drain for easy cleanup. When the happy doper is done puking and comes around, he/she is cleaned up, fed and sent on their way.
What you are suggesting is nothing short of torture.
Sleep deprivation, beatings and waterboarding would have nothing on your solution.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DanDanDat
Why are we assuming that being saved from a drug overdose is the best thing for these people? Perhaps death is better as it ends the misery that they must be in to get to that point in the first place.
Perhaps we need to rethink our peritanucal views of death. It's not always such a bad thing.
Why don't we euthanize them all at birth, then we'd never have anyone with attitudes like yours.
originally posted by: cooperton
a reply to: Breakthestreak
I don't disagree with your skepticism, but if there were a drug that cured cancer with 75-100% efficiency like Narcan does with drug overdose, I would be more than willing to shell out more tax-payer dollars for that. Unfortunately such a drug doesn't exist.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DanDanDat
Why are we assuming that being saved from a drug overdose is the best thing for these people? Perhaps death is better as it ends the misery that they must be in to get to that point in the first place.
Perhaps we need to rethink our peritanucal views of death. It's not always such a bad thing.
Why don't we euthanize them all at birth, then we'd never have anyone with attitudes like yours.
People suck, we should all go back to where came from, piss off you freeloader scum...
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DanDanDat
Why are we assuming that being saved from a drug overdose is the best thing for these people? Perhaps death is better as it ends the misery that they must be in to get to that point in the first place.
Perhaps we need to rethink our peritanucal views of death. It's not always such a bad thing.
Why don't we euthanize them all at birth, then we'd never have anyone with attitudes like yours.
People suck, we should all go back to where came from, piss off you freeloader scum...
You do realize that I was being sarcastic.
But, are you suggesting that we climb back into the womb?
Most guys are always already trying to do that.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: chr0naut
Straight men are still a majority, well I never.
And yeah I get your posts, I pretty much agree with much of what you say, which is weird because you're a sheep screwing wierdo kiwi and likely drink fosters, my post was also sarcasm.