It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: carewemust
When a Federal Judge declares any of Trump Admin actions (DACA, Immigration, Terrorist related) as "unconstitutional", the activity/action must stop IMMEDIATELY.
How will today's ruling by the Federal Judge immediately affect this Obama Admin program?
Just curious but why do you feel that way?
Is it because it is a federal judge ruling or just your partisan belief system?
Either answer is fine but be honest.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: LordAhriman
YES! What a win. We don't need the poor, or the sick! Definitely not the poor people who are sick!
So there were no poor or sick people in the USA after o-care was reconciled? Amazing!
They're still here, they can just live longer if they get sick. For now.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
originally posted by: carewemust
When a Federal Judge declares any of Trump Admin actions (DACA, Immigration, Terrorist related) as "unconstitutional", the activity/action must stop IMMEDIATELY.
How will today's ruling by the Federal Judge immediately affect this Obama Admin program?
Just curious but why do you feel that way?
Is it because it is a federal judge ruling or just your partisan belief system?
Either answer is fine but be honest.
I haven't seen Federal Judges strike down programs prior to 2017. So I have no experience to draw upon. I'm sure they have, but I just don't remember any Obama actions as being deemed unconstitutional.
If you can refer me to one, I'd like to look it up and see if that action/program was immediately ceased/terminated.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Xcathdra
President Trump and the Republicans own this and the rising rates as well as the millions of people that will lose their health coverage.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xcathdra
Without that mandate it was unconstitutional.
YTBD
No it was determined in the scotus ruling. The law was upheld because it was a tax. Absent the mandate it wouldnt hold up.
and it didnt.
“If you were ever tempted to think that right-wing judges weren’t activist — that they were only ‘enforcing the Constitution’ or ‘reading the statute’ — this will persuade you to knock it off,” wrote law professor Nicholas Bagley. “This is insanity in print, and it will not stand up on appeal.”
originally posted by: rickymouse
We have to stop all the unneeded tests, the colon screening when there are no symptoms at all is a waste of money. If there are some symptoms, I see no problem, but lately the doctors are sticking unnecessary expenses up our A$$es
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: rickymouse
We have to stop all the unneeded tests, the colon screening when there are no symptoms at all is a waste of money. If there are some symptoms, I see no problem, but lately the doctors are sticking unnecessary expenses up our A$$es
It's better for each of us if large Colon Polyps are removed before they turn cancerous. Waiting until you see blood in the toilet, or find it in a poop-sample, is too late 80% of the time. (RIP)
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ketsuko
Not really, though it may have cost them more to maintain it.
Net result was that far more got coverage. Right?
No coverage at all for colds, flu, minor accidents, pain control, etc.
The problem is, it'll never fly. No one is willing to have the basics unless they get all those pretty bells and whistles with it.