It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Question: What In The Hell Were The Globalists Thinking?

page: 2
16
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 02:02 PM
link   
I don’t know what they were thinking, I can only guess, but I am sure that they knew exactly what the outcome would be, of mixing politically and religious incompatible people with one another. Why do you think they (the hastards that be) have special thinktanks and secret meetings like the bilderberg assembly and the council of foreign relations? The crap they decide has been chewed over into infinity, before implementing it.

To the “common” people it can sometimes appear like “their” plans are backfiring, or not working properly. However, I can assure you, even their apparent fnck nps, are part of the script. What may seem like a mistake to us, can actually be going exactly as envisioned by the planners. These people do not think in short terms, they let their scenario’s play out, no matter the duration. It’s a genration game. In some ways these people really do live forever, just not in the physical sense. Some plans can only be implemented after first “prepping”, or skipping, a whole generation. Its what they do...




posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 02:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Painterz
Your wrong! Google is your friend, you look up the facts and figures cos they're there.
Why did Angela Merkel ask for an influx of immigrants? Why because the german population is failing. Now why is that? Because all the european countries told their populations that they were over beeding, having too many children. Now come the facts you don't want to see.
European countries average birth rate per couple is .92 children. So for further population 4 adults now can only produce 1 child. Or .92 of a child.
Muslims are having 6 to 7 children per FEMALE. Now work out the maths and tell me how long it takes for Muslims to have the majority of the population. No need, it's been done and it's projected that they will have the majority in about 2038. When that happen (that's ALL facts not fear mongering) THAT'S when Sharia moves in.

edit on 12-12-2018 by crayzeed because: added.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: Painterz
Your wrong! Google is your friend, you look up the facts and figures cos they're there.
Why did Angela Merkel ask for an influx of immigrants? Why because the german population is failing. Now why is that? Because all the european countries told their populations that they were over beeding, having too many children. Now come the facts you don't want to see.
European countries average birth rate per couple is .92 children. So for further population 4 adults now can only produce 1 child. Or .92 of a child.
Muslims are having 6 to 7 children per FEMALE. Now work out the maths and tell me how long it takes for Muslims to have the majority of the population. No need, it's been done and it's projected that they will have the majority in about 2038. When that happen (that's ALL facts not fear mongering) THAT'S when Sharia moves in.




Uhm, that's some pretty epic maths fail right there I'm afraid. Your maths has been done by people who can't do maths.

Here's some actual fact checking for you:

www.channel4.com...


One of the key points to take from it is the maths behind the claim that they will become a majority is complete bunkum. And secondly the other key point is that when Muslim women come to secular Western countries, they tend to have way fewer children than they do back in second and third world countries of origin. It averages out at 3.0, not the 6-7 you quote. And by 2050 it's expected to have dropped further.



I do however absolutely agree with you about the aging population crisis of Western Europe, and that we desperately need to be importing lots of young working age immigrants so as to pay for the welfare systems to keep us all from dying when we are old. Because the demographic timebomb is ticking and there's not much longer to fix it.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 02:49 PM
link   
A pile of sand is just that. Keep adding to it though and it become a heap. A heap is not a pile, and it only exists as a concept because the piles got too large and took on new meaning. If we never added to the piles, the heap would never have been created. And once it becomes a heap it is unclear if it can ever turn back into a pile. The globalists think they see the 'heap' that will be created when the piling on of immigration reaches that tipping point.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 03:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
a reply to: Dfairlite

My personal feeling is that if Europe is under one sharia law & one religion which allows for no dissent, then oh how much easier it would be for the little darlings to control us minions.


Good to see some people get what is going on


Well done, more will keep waking up to the reality of the threat socialist communism globalists pose to a free Constitutional Republic.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Templeton

In reality they are having the exact opposite effect

The speed at which they used to move made it tough to notice. But these days, they are desperate and making one final desperate grasp at open borders, foreigner infiltration/replacement of native population and generally destroying individual liberty/freedom in the name of their darling "democracy" (mob rule BS) and some pathetic form of egalitarianism (ie: Peter must be robbed to pay Paul, according to them. Naturally, we're Peter and they're Paul. naturally.)

We're wise to their tactics, their intent and their plan. Their disdain for this country, their hatred of our people and their constant attacks on individual rights and the Constitution makes that very clear. They hate our beautiful, exceptional and great country and everything we as a people stand for.

The sooner we see this realistically, in terms of us vs. them the better off we'll be. We should remain vigilant and never falter or waver in standing up for the Constitution. Unlike those cowards, we stand/salute the flag and kneel for the fallen because that is what a real proud American does

edit on 12/12/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2018 @ 12:04 AM
link   
a reply to: whargoul



I'll help you out. Your world view has been clouded by right-wing fear mongers.


Oh geez. Get ready, right off the bat you know this is going to be a whopper. Started off with four buzz words combined into a single phrase: "right wing" and "fear-mongers"



"The globalists are not compassionate", apparently they are. OR, maybe they do not exist in the manner you think they do.


They are? What makes you say that? They're not trying to help these people, they're just allowing them to torment the native populations. If anything this proves they're even more sadistic than I give them credit for. I mean, in this scenario they've put their power as 2nd to their spreading of torment.

The globalists absolutely exist. That's far past debate at this point.


Maybe, they ("the globalists") are presented as a red herring to throw you off the scent of corrupt corporations despoiling the world under the deregulation paradise of your libertarian masters?


Libertarian masters? Who are these libertarian masters you speak of? People like those dastardly koch brothers who want open borders? Or people like mark zuckerberg who censor people who disagree with his political views? Or maybe you're talking about congressmen like Rand Paul who want to audit the fed? Pretty sure you have invented a new contingent to fear monger about.



Is nafta good? Your guy just signed us back up. Globalist?


Reciprocal free trade is good, yes. NAFTA was not that and neither is the USMCA, but it's getting closer. I'm a realist and don't expect perfect results on the first try. These types of changes take time.


Is immigration bad for the country? You guys have had unfettered control of the government for the last two years and done nothing but bitch about it. Are they just stirring your hatred for the other, or did they do anything?


Now onto the lies! That didn't take long! Immigration? You mean illegal immigration? Yeah, of course that's what you mean, you just wanted to conflate the two things. Legal immigration is fine. Illegal immigration is not.

Did republicans have 60 votes in the senate (which is required for budget bills)? No. Ok, then I guess they didn't have unfettered control and do nothing, did they.


Your world view has been clouded by right-wing fear mongers and you drank that cool-aide deep enough that reality doesn't work for you anymore. Pull your head back out and rejoin the rest of us. We wont bite.


LOL, my judgement has been clouded? Puhhhhlease, your ignorance is not my judgement being clouded.



posted on Dec, 17 2018 @ 02:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Quote.They've lost france, the US, italy, and the UK due to this one policy. All they had to do was reject this contingent and let them suffer and kill each other off (the globalists are not compassionate, they are fine with this stuff as long as they get power).

So why in the world did they embrace this contingent/policy? What good did they think it would do them? Unquote.


IMO; as I see it "The good" (their word not mine), they got from this action was:

a population first disturbed by violence and then, normalised to violence

a breakdown of social cohesion

a fractured society

a diminution of national pride and national identity

injection of a religion that is brutal and made for the benefit of men

a community where in one section of the population, all males will likely wear the same uniform in the near future and all have beards

a community where in one section of the population where soon all women will wear the same uniform

a community where in one section of the population, a change in the status of women from near equals with men to sexual objects, sexual provocateurs, and purveyors of immorality, has occurred.

a change in the demographics of a white population to a majority black population within the space of one generation due to the explosive birth rate of non whites compared to the white birth rate

Several countries which are possibly set on a path to civil war within the not too distant future and which would likely see the ejection of the white population.

Overall' I think they would likely agree among themselves that they have achieved a great deal.



edit on 17-12-2018 by Azureblue because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 17 2018 @ 03:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Azureblue

While I agree with much of what you've reasoned here, as far as how they view this as an accomplishment, I fail to see how they have come out ahead here. They're losing their power because of this. They just needed to slowly allow infiltration and their plan would have gone off without a hitch but they went crazy and balls to the wall on open borders and islam. That's what I don't get. Why were they in such a rush?



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 02:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
a reply to: Azureblue

While I agree with much of what you've reasoned here, as far as how they view this as an accomplishment, I fail to see how they have come out ahead here. They're losing their power because of this. They just needed to slowly allow infiltration and their plan would have gone off without a hitch but they went crazy and balls to the wall on open borders and islam. That's what I don't get. Why were they in such a rush?


thanks

From what I've read over the last couple of years they are in a hurry because they have fallen behind in the roll out of the global agenda, agenda 21 and 30 whatever it is. (See Dr Days 1969 talk "Everything is in Place and No-one Can Stop Us Now" talk.)

Its this loss of pace that is causing them to be more out in the light and more risk taking leading to clumsy in terms of outcomes. One of the things that are concerned about it seems is that the masses are waking up faster than anticipated.



posted on Dec, 18 2018 @ 02:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Azureblue

Interesting, I'll have to look into that Dr Days talk. Thanks for the responses.




top topics



 
16
<< 1   >>

log in

join