It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Question: What In The Hell Were The Globalists Thinking?

page: 1
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 05:55 AM
link   
They were marching right down the road to their new world order of oppression and poverty for the many and power and riches for them. Then they decided they needed to start importing mass amounts of people from incompatible cultures into the west. Why? They've lost france, the US, italy, and the UK due to this one policy. All they had to do was reject this contingent and let them suffer and kill each other off (the globalists are not compassionate, they are fine with this stuff as long as they get power).

So why in the world did they embrace this contingent/policy?

What good did they think it would do them?

The middle east only makes up about 6% of the world population. Were they just that unwilling to cede control of that part of the population?

Someone, help me out here.




posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 06:07 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

My personal feeling is that if Europe is under one sharia law & one religion which allows for no dissent, then oh how much easier it would be for the little darlings to control us minions.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 06:15 AM
link   
Not sure who the globalist are, maybe they are like adopted parents with children that end up hating them. So, they in turn hate them. (the people that still have minds of a mature thinking adopted child).



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 06:46 AM
link   
The Lord works in mysterious ways.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:24 AM
link   
They're not actually importing that many people into European cities. The UK is 81.9% White British, and most of the 18.1% who are non-white are people from places that used to be part of the Empire. Not Muslims.

4.4% of the UK population is Muslim.

3.8% of the EU population is Muslim.


There is zero threat of Sharia law anywhere in Europe.

So the more important question is to ask who are the people lying about this imaginary Muslim threat, why are they lying, and what are they gaining by whipping up fear and loathing?



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   

Question: What In The Hell Were The Globalists Thinking?


They want to turn our frogs gay.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   

edit on 12-12-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   

edit on 12-12-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:31 AM
link   

edit on 12-12-2018 by CriticalStinker because: (no reason given)


+2 more 
posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite


Cloward-Piven

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

-Wiki



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:43 AM
link   


UN to adopt migration pact at meeting hit by withdrawals

New Brazil government to pull out of UN migration accord


Immigration Hardline Spreads as Chile Back Pedals on U.N Treaty



The US government disavowed the negotiations late last year, and since then Australia, Austria, the Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Poland and Slovakia have pulled out of the process. The US on Friday took a fresh swipe at the pact, labelling it "an effort by the United Nations to advance global governance at the expense of the sovereign right of states".


Belgium's ruling coalition collapses over UN pact on migration

Denmark Feels Heat Again Over Treatment of Foreigners


Denmark is once again grabbing international headlines for its treatment of foreigners. This week, the United Nations expressed "serious concern" about Danish plans to relocate rejected asylum seekers and convicted immigrants to a small island that was once used for animal testing.


edit on 12122018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)


ETA
UN Chief Returns as Climate Talks Teeter Closer to Collapse

The secretary-general of the United Nations has flown back to global climate talks in Poland to urge countries to reach an agreement, as some observers feared the meeting might end without a deal.

edit on 12122018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 08:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker



Out of ALL Your 'duds' I enjoyed this one the best... A 'star' for Your efforts.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 09:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

The division it sows keeps the plebs from being focused on their true agenda (tech immortality).




posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 09:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: JimNasium

originally posted by: CriticalStinker



Out of ALL Your 'duds' I enjoyed this one the best... A 'star' for Your efforts.


Hey thanks!

Whatever they do want though, looks like they're meeting some resistance in the US, UK, and now France.... Those are three pretty key players.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 09:09 AM
link   
This is /was their plan


edit on 12-12-2018 by Aallanon because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

Excellent question......not easy to answer, S&F



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Dfairlite


Cloward-Piven

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".

-Wiki





And what a great plan THAT was, because no one would EVER raise prices on EVERYTHING, once everyone had a base income, putting the poorest among us right back in the position where they started. Quite the idiots they would seem.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Dfairlite
They were marching right down the road to their new world order of oppression and poverty for the many and power and riches for them. Then they decided they needed to start importing mass amounts of people from incompatible cultures into the west. Why? They've lost france, the US, italy, and the UK due to this one policy. All they had to do was reject this contingent and let them suffer and kill each other off (the globalists are not compassionate, they are fine with this stuff as long as they get power).

So why in the world did they embrace this contingent/policy?

What good did they think it would do them?

The middle east only makes up about 6% of the world population. Were they just that unwilling to cede control of that part of the population?

Someone, help me out here.


I'll help you out. Your world view has been clouded by right-wing fear mongers.

"The globalists are not compassionate", apparently they are. OR, maybe they do not exist in the manner you think they do.

Maybe, they ("the globalists") are presented as a red herring to throw you off the scent of corrupt corporations despoiling the world under the deregulation paradise of your libertarian masters?

I dunno just spit balling here.

Is nafta good? Your guy just signed us back up. Globalist? Is immigration bad for the country? You guys have had unfettered control of the government for the last two years and done nothing but bitch about it. Are they just stirring your hatred for the other, or did they do anything?

Your world view has been clouded by right-wing fear mongers and you drank that cool-aide deep enough that reality doesn't work for you anymore. Pull your head back out and rejoin the rest of us. We wont bite.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 12:26 PM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

^ That right there. Well put and we also welcome HDS/ODS displaced souls.

The way forward is through the light.

Walk toward the light without fear.



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: whargoul

Hey - wake up!! Where the hell were you in March 2003 just before the US whacked Iraq? There were literally millions and millions of folks all over the planet protesting AGAINST the invasion, even after Powells little slideshow at the UN.

But still, the cries for peace were ignored - THE GLOBALISTS INVADED IRAQ - FOR THE OIL - AND THEY USED THEIR STRONG-ARM WEAPON (THE US MILITARY & THE COALITION OF THE WILLING) TO DO THEIR BIDDING.

HALIBURTON GOT THEIR MILITARY ESCORT INTO IRAQ TO SECURE THE FIELDS.

DICK "I CAN SHOOT HIM IN THE FACE AND ESCAPE ANY PENALTY" CHENEY, A GLOBALIST AND POLITICIAN AT THE TIME, WAS ON THEIR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Fast forward 15 years - who has all the oil & gas in Iraq? (Hint - not the Iraqi people)

Those globalists - they're the ones you are helping with your skewed version of reality.




top topics



 
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join