It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump's crimes or lack thereof

page: 3
12
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: network dude

Adam Schiff, also known as the 'human political gauge of opposite world' said that there is a high likelihood that Trump will face jail time, therefore in keeping with that, there is a high likelihood that a high ranking democrat will face jail time.

If you look up the words 'nervous projection' in the dictionary, there is an actual picture of Schiff with his best worst creepy grin-thing - true story.






Adam Schitt will be Indited for Leaking Classified Files to Foreign Nationals and receiving 8 Million Dollars for his Troubles . He knows his Days are Numbered , so he Attacks in order to Deflect . A Predictable Petty Human .




posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude


The only issue I have with any of this is that this investigation stemmed from FISA warrants from a dossier created and purchased by the Hillary campaign.


It's fruit from a poisoned tree.


Trump should just walk away from this, but the rule of law no longer exists as evidenced by the continued investigation even after the revelation that the dossier was proven false.


When was the dossier proven false?



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:16 PM
link   
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976)

7-2 ruling about campaign finance laws.

Specifically in the decision it is stated that an individual may give or spend as much as they like in their own campaign, however 3rd parties are limited.

Basically because if the alleged payment of this was done by Trump, in favor of his own campaign there is NO FEC violation. Specifically because Cohen allegedly made the payment for Trump, and was acting as his personal attorney in doing so (if it actually occurred that way) it is legally as if Trump made the payment himself if he did in fact tell Cohen to specifically take the action he did. This is all being convoluted heavily due to a misunderstanding by laypeople about what "on behalf of" means when relating to lawyers and legal representation. So overall this is more of an air sandwich than even an air sandwich could be. The irony is that Cohen is the only person in the situation that could face fallout if he did not specifically get a waiver signed by Trump for him to take the actions that he did.



posted on Dec, 11 2018 @ 05:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude


The only issue I have with any of this is that this investigation stemmed from FISA warrants from a dossier created and purchased by the Hillary campaign.


It's fruit from a poisoned tree.


Trump should just walk away from this, but the rule of law no longer exists as evidenced by the continued investigation even after the revelation that the dossier was proven false.


When was the dossier proven false?
what parts were proven true?



posted on Dec, 12 2018 @ 07:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude


The only issue I have with any of this is that this investigation stemmed from FISA warrants from a dossier created and purchased by the Hillary campaign.


It's fruit from a poisoned tree.


Trump should just walk away from this, but the rule of law no longer exists as evidenced by the continued investigation even after the revelation that the dossier was proven false.


When was the dossier proven false?
what parts were proven true?




The " Dossier " was Only Proven to be the Same Material as the Moon , Green Cheese .......It is a COMIC BOOK , and Badly Done by the way .....
edit on 12-12-2018 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)




 
12
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join