It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Will House Democrats Use as President Trumps Impeachable Offense?

page: 6
16
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 06:36 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Just another Rah Rah trump thread brought to you by his biggest supporters.

If only they reflected what is actually happening in the real world.




posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 06:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
So far, five pages of comments and post but still ZERO impeachable offences.

What a surprise


Notice how the "Bueller" "Memos" are twisted towards some very minor "misdemeanors" against Trump.

That's what they will go for now since the Russian Collusion thing is drying up.

Not much left to go after, but the BS-DemocratMSM-BS will capitalize on anything they can.

And a side note: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now claiming she has Sephardi Jewish heritage from Spain.

🍋🖐



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 06:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Just another Rah Rah trump thread brought to you by his biggest supporters.

If only they reflected what is actually happening in the real world.



well rah rah sis boom bah 💥🍇💥



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 07:55 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




That's what they will go for now since the Russian Collusion thing is drying up.


Oh my god.... this is as bloviated as the Seth Rich story.
You are ignoring the circumstantial evidence that we already have and assuming that Mueller has nothing else.
That's an optimistic viewpoint but its ill warranted if you just stop ignoring the news.
Fox is going to advance the presidents viewpoint no matter how unsupported in reality it is.
They will not cover stories that contradict what trump wants you to be thinking.

And in the process they are totally ignoring news stating the opposite.
But head in sand is not going to buffer your mind from the truth once its all out.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:04 AM
link   

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,..



Poor spelling and grammar.
edit on 12102018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,..



Poor spelling and grammar.


I'm sure your spelling and grammar were spot on before you edited your post


While you aren't the President... you are the president of the "Trump=Bad" Committee (and also a client!)

[yet, something tells me he used 'smocking' on purpose]




posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump “Democrats can’t find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,..



Poor spelling and grammar.


so that is the "impeachable offence" you are going for here?



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:17 AM
link   
a reply to: six67seven

Im not the president and I also know how to use spell check.
The edit was to make the word smocking red.
Not to correct any errors.
This edit was to advise you of the above...
And you can believe that he didn't misspell smoking if you want but that is just you wearing rose colored glasses.
He misspelled smoking. He can't spell and its probably the reason he doesn't read either.
edit on 12102018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:23 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Retarded. They need to focus on things that are important, but we're all aware that they aren't too smart.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Here 💰 go buy a sense of humor.
That was obviously just me making fun of the idiot again.
edit on 12102018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

depends on what you "see" the word "Smocking" to mean doesn't it/////////

🍋🖐



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:35 AM
link   
It’s a little premature to talk impeachment. Mueller is not done yet. However, I recommend brushing up on John Edwards and his misuse of campaign funds as a primer though. a reply to: carewemust



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: six67seven

Im not the president and I also know how to use spell check.
The edit was to make the word smocking red.
Not to correct any errors.
This edit was to advise you of the above...


Correction: I'm


Pot, meet Kettle.
edit on R372018-12-10T08:37:08-06:00k3712Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R422018-12-10T08:42:03-06:00k4212Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

No it doesnt. He misspelled smoking. He is stupid.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

No it doesnt. He misspelled smoking. He is stupid.



You can't use a proper contraction...You are stupid

edit on R372018-12-10T08:37:57-06:00k3712Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R392018-12-10T08:39:46-06:00k3912Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:44 AM
link   
If you were to get some news outside of am radio, chain email or faux newz you might have a clue. Since you are either too lazy or Incapable to do so I helped you out.

www.nytimes.com...

I like this agenda. In my opinion, reversing citizens united should be the number 1 priority. Unions should be focused on labor issues and not be used as political slush funds. The ultra wealthy should not be able to use unaccountable funds to buy elections.


a reply to: LSU2018



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
So far, five pages of comments and post but still ZERO impeachable offences.

What a surprise



And a side note: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is now claiming she has Sephardi Jewish heritage from Spain.

🍋🖐


maybe you can finagle a few threads out of that behind the keyboard whilst She accomplishes more than just 'internet'...



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:57 AM
link   
a reply to: odzeandennz

Yes maybe.

Yes maybe.

intranets

😆



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 08:58 AM
link   
The house dems need a simple majority, they can impeach for the wrong hair color if they like.
The senate is another story
Civics is your friend.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 09:37 AM
link   
First thing they will try is....two scoops of ice cream!!!




top topics



 
16
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join