It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Will House Democrats Use as President Trumps Impeachable Offense?

page: 10
17
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 30 2019 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

His 2020 chances are already quite slim.


hah

ok, who's going to beat him?




posted on May, 30 2019 @ 08:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
He’s already won 2020


There are still very dangerous people in the Intel community who are loyal to Brennan and Clapper. Until they are removed, President Trump isn't safe. We want him on the ballot in November 2020!

BTW... did you see what Kim Jong-Un did to his chief U.S. Envoy, after the talks between NK/US broke down in Hanoi?

Failure = Death: www.reuters.com... 2PD



posted on May, 30 2019 @ 09:06 PM
link   
the radical Democrats who give allegiance to the Party-Uber-Alles
will slime & relentlessly Attack Trump for his White Privilege and Small Hands...

those are the Only Two, wacko reasons the Democrat deep-state need to slime/impale/impeach the POTUS



posted on May, 30 2019 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Anyone. Honestly.... anyone at all.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 12:05 AM
link   
Trump has done nothing to lose anyone who voted for him in 2016. He has done enough to win over some never Trumpers. He has done enough to win over some independents. He has done enough to win over some non-Socialist Dems.

Trump will have to run against Creepy Biden or a Socialist with a DNC that does not have benefit of a weaponized FBI/DOJ/CIA/NSA.

It will be fun.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 12:10 AM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

What will change or what could change I am not a prophet... but what could change is the amount of detail we have about what he may or may not have done.
If he is compromised in any way.
If he was complicit in any money laundering operations with Russia.
There are still a number of questions regarding over 140 russian contacts during his campaign. Mueller had a chore getting evidence because he said people lied and people destroyed records. That information may come to the fore.
Who knows ...
But every day the rumblings of the disgustingly filthy I word gets louder.
If they open any impeachment hearing then they will get everything they request. The flow of information that may come out of that alone might sway senators who would rather see honor returned to the office by installing Mike Pence as president. If there is a lot of evidence in Muellers files as he certainly implied, the revelation of that evidence may be overwhelming.



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 01:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Anyone. Honestly.... anyone at all.


Actually the fact is:

No one. Honestly.... no one at all.

🤣🤣



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 01:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

What "140 russian contacts during his campaign" ?

😆😆😆😆



posted on May, 31 2019 @ 01:04 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Bueller's "Implied Insufficiencies" 😆😆😆😆😆



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:12 PM
link   
For those of you who didn't read the redacted version of the Mueller Report:


"Inside the Mueller Report, a sophisticated Russian interference campaign"

Source: PBS Newshour - June 3, 2019




posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:16 PM
link   
"Why 'numerous links' between Trump campaign and Russia didn't add up to conspiracy"

Source: PBS Newshour - June 4, 2019

Link:




posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Actually more than 140.

A lot more.
nearly 300 is closer to the truth.
themoscowproject.org...



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: St Udio

no it's not.



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

He has lost a lot of them. Promises broken.



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Anyone. Honestly.... anyone at all.


being as how that is the attitude that lost the leftists the election in 2016, would you like to make a small wager on that?

Perhaps changing one's avitar for a month with a sign stating ______________ was right, and __________was wrong, with the blanks being filled in with your and my screen name, respectively. (if you need to know what any of the big words mean, just let me know)



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Insufficinet was only for part one the russian conspiracy.

He did not say that about part two... the obstruction of justice part.
On this portion he said if he could have exonerated the president he would have.
He said if he they had confidence after a thorough examination of the facts that the president clearly did not obstruct justice he would so state.
He said that based on facts and applicable legal standards he was unable to reach that judgement.

Unable to reach that judgement.



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:41 PM
link   

edit on 652019 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:43 PM
link   
I'm curious can a president who's been impeached still run for reelection and if so what happens if they win?



posted on Jun, 5 2019 @ 02:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme


Who cares. Are you gonna take his bet or not?



posted on Jun, 6 2019 @ 01:50 PM
link   
"What the Mueller report says about Trump firing James Comey"

Source: PBS Newshour - June 5, 2019

Link:





top topics



 
17
<< 7  8  9    11 >>

log in

join