It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -14-

page: 15
130
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.




posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:17 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:21 AM
link   
a reply to: 3n19m470




...chan board asking Q+ (Trump) to use a specific word in his next tweet and less than 10 minutes later, Trump tweeted and used the word requested....


I remember that happening. Do you recall what the word was?



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:22 AM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

There is no purpose, except to try and bait and create doubt. "JP doth protest too much, methinks".
Of all the things we have explored here, the "gate" has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, IMHO.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: scraedtosleep

Or maybe there is no bombshell at all! Sorry, I've seen this all before. Constant "on the edge" predictions that fail. Then a reason is given to why it failed.

Either it's "it was done on purpose", or, "it did happen but it was kept low key". The only exception here is that Q has become huge.

Q has failed countless time, yet somehow convinced his followers that the failed predictions are all apart of the plan.

Then Q believers think the skeptics are trolls or shills! Reminds me of flat earthers.



Well Q believers have many many many many reasons to believe. We were told from the start that disinfo was necessary. If making those predictions caused the deep state to react and that helped the good guys then im all for it.

You just have a very... naive... idea of how operators use human psychology to accomplish their objectives.

But you know what? If Q turned on us or was somehow exposed beyond a doubt, we have invested very little, so there is no harm in following along but doing so carefully. I havent even bought any Q gear, not that that money even goes to Q. I havent changed anything about the way I live my life because of stuff I read in Q drops.

My only investment is my freetime. The same thing you, daskakik, anarchist and the others are investing... hmmm.


edit on 12/10/2018 by 3n19m470 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: 3n19m470




...chan board asking Q+ (Trump) to use a specific word in his next tweet and less than 10 minutes later, Trump tweeted and used the word requested....


I remember that happening. Do you recall what the word was?


I am almost sure it was amazing. Not an uncommon word but the fact it happened within 10 mins and the anon chose the word.

Another time an anon requested a 1 min or a 5 min delta to get morale up, Q/Trump right away posted a (the very first i think) ZERO MIN DELTA.

Meaning a Q drop and Trump tweet were posted within the same minute and right after an anon from the bords requested a good Delta for morale...



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:27 AM
link   
How's it going with those 50k sealed indictments?



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: ErrorErrorError

Most are still sealed, some have started being unsealed. Pay attention.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: PokeyJoe

I go to church to check out chicks. That doesn't mean that other's are not there to worship.

Ok, not true, but I think it illustrates the point.


It doesnt illustrate jack because as you said it is not true and nobody would do that except for some weird creep.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: 3n19m470

Also, tippy top around Easter this year.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: tiredoflooking

Since when did he need to bait people to attack him?



The fact that you need this explained shows youre either not very smart or just trolling on purpose.

Either way, not worth my time. But I'll humor you for a portion of today, in case you are not a troll and are just not very smart and need a little help. I'll tell you why you are wrong.

He doesn't need to bait people to attack him. His goal isnt merely to be attacked. Its to he attacked by enough people to make it noticeable, and to make it believeable when something happens and the news says "it was one of those frothing mad qanons that was attacking Podesta the other day, you saw how crazy they were!"



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
How's it going with those 50k sealed indictments?


Quite well actually


But thanks to the filings of Agnifilo and Geragos on this topic, we also know several more facts about the case against Raniere et al – including these little tidbits:
On January 18, 2018, Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak (EDNY) issued a search warrant on Raniere’s Yahoo account: keithraniere@yahoo.com.
In March 2018, the government obtained search warrants for Nancy Salzman’s house – and Clare Bronfman’s Gmail account: clarewbronfman@gmail.com. In October 2018, the government obtained additional search warrants on the same two email accounts – and on some of the devices that were seized by the FBI from Salzman’s house back in March 2018.
On November 2, 2018, the government disclosed the existence of the new search warrants. On November 21, 2018, the government provided redacted copies of the search warrants to the attorneys who are currently representing Raniere, Bronfman, and Salzman.
On November 26, 2018, the attorneys who are currently representing Raniere, Bronfman, and Salzman requested that the government “…promptly produce the unredacted versions of the search warrants, at least to the portions of the affidavits that refer to the alleged schemes already charged in the Superseding Indictment returned over four months ago.”

As of right now, this little brouhaha is nothing more than a pissing match as to when the government has to totally unseal the new search warrants it obtained a couple of months ago. That’s eventually going to happen as part of the normal discovery process.

The real news is that the government is continuing to gather new evidence against Raniere, Bronfman, and Nancy Salzman.


Dec 8th - Federal Investigation Continues To Expand

ETA

The leaves open the question of whether the government is also actively investigating other members of the NXIVM crime syndicate – and whether it will also name some of these individuals in a future superseding indictment.......

One other thing that Agnifilo and Geragos disclosed in their aforementioned December 5th letter is just how much information the prosecution has already accumulated against the defendants. As they noted in that letter. “… the defendants have been actively reviewing the ‘250,000 bates-numbered pages of discovery,’ (and) the ‘forensic copies of devices containing at least another approximately 1,000,000 documents and approximately 1000 audio/visual files’ the Government has produced”.

edit on 12102018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)

edit on 12102018 by MetalThunder because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   
a reply to: MetalThunder

I wonder who they emailed...

Can't WAIT to find out


They just added a brand new prosecutor to the team as well.

Word is they will be other people indicted.

Just IMAGINE who that might be, could be anyone really...

Hollywood, political, all connected to NXIVM.

They have it all



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:55 AM
link   
a reply to: CanadianMason

OMG That guy is about to blow.
He's delusional.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: daskakik

I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.


If a "fervent follower" is not a "worshiper" then what is the distinction?

Healthy skepticism?

On a different note, can anyone summarize the predictions that "Q" is making in this OP?

Not being a "follower" I find most of this very cryptic and confusing.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 11:03 AM
link   
Ohhh what have we here????





www.urbandictionary.com...



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

And what does smocking gun mean?



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: tiredoflooking

You have trump misspelling the work smoking. That's what you have here.



posted on Dec, 10 2018 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Extorris

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: daskakik

I cant find one person around here worshiping Q, and we're some of the most fervent followers around.


If a "fervent follower" is not a "worshiper" then what is the distinction?

Healthy skepticism?

On a different note, can anyone summarize the predictions that "Q" is making in this OP?

Not being a "follower" I find most of this very cryptic and confusing.


I may "follow" the Kardashians and buy their products (I don't ), that doesn't mean I worship them.

See the difference?

The more you know.
Btw, their skin cream is great!







 
130
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join