It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -14-

page: 132
130
<< 129  130  131    133  134  135 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: liveandlearn

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: 0311Warrior

100% agree with ya brother. We needed the wall long ago. A country without borders is no country at all.

Keep up the good fight.

GODSPEED!


And speaking of the wall, as of now it has $13,755,702. I expect it to be slow considering it is the weekend before
Chirstmas.

Here is what he says


Republcan Representative Warren Davidson has bill on the table right now HR 7207 that if passed with Gov Funding bill we can give the funds towards the wall, and with our contractual guarantee to only be used on the wall.

• Rep Andy Harris Introduced the Border Wall Bonds Act of 2018, if passed with the Gov Funding bill it will allow us to donate towards the wall. this Act funds only for the construction of the wall, nothing else
.

• 100% of your donations will go to the Trump Wall.

• We are working with a law firm on a legal document that will bind the government to using the funds for the border wall itself, nothing else.

• We will hold all funds and not release a single penny until we have all legal aspects covered to ensure our money goes only to the wall.


This bill is important because unless it is included and pass, the money could go to IRS. He promises to give it back otherwise.

I mention this because others who have not read the precautions he has taken are blowing him off and making fun.

BTW, I will not reply to comments about whether the wall is good or not



LAL, I was afraid this would come up. It is way too complicated to explain, but the feds have no way of either dealing with this or using it. That "money" is IOU's and as such cannot be used the way folks want it to be. The IRS money goes right to the FED - not money but either fed notes of signatures via check ONLY, as they are not authorized to take money (gold, silver, land) so they can take this. The "money" the gov uses to fund government comes from a trust, based on things like Humans As Currency. This money, while well meaning, is a disaster. The guy writing a "bill" is making it worse, he needs to demand that is returned.




posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
It looks like Matthew Whitaker is already disappointing President Trump.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

What is your perspective on this Q-sters?


Don't buy it, no one leaks. This comes from Adam Schiff.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:40 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

In 1976, President Gerald Ford restricted the President's powers, after a National Emergency is declared.
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 12/21/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: carewemust
It looks like Matthew Whitaker is already disappointing President Trump.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

What is your perspective on this Q-sters?


Don't buy it, no one leaks. This comes from Adam Schiff.


That would explain why it's a CNN exclusive. It was their reference to Rudy Giuliani not confirming or denying, that gave it a little credence in my mind.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: pheonix358
During a shutdown, does the President gain any interesting special powers?

No, I am not talking about laser killing eyeballs.

Does he gain some powers normally held by others?

P


Only IF he decides to declare a national emergency.

Then all Hell comes to Earth !! 😎


didn't he just re up that last week?

we're at war.

Mirror date: december 21, 2017, EO for the ages - asset seizure.

dark to light

I'm pretty confident he wants this and not because of the wall. It is a Q thread - recent Q and wall? Nope. Q and ISIS, obama, HRC C_A yep...


(insert vaping girl here)



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:50 PM
link   
It looks like Defense Secretary Mattis may have been a "Black Hat". He was counting on working for President Hillary.

www.thedailybeast.com...

No wonder he was so disappointed by President Trump's lack of military aggression. Hillary would have kept Mattis very busy with implementing part-2 of the 16 year plan that Q described.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
It looks like Defense Secretary Mattis may have been a "Black Hat". He was counting on working for President Hillary.

www.thedailybeast.com...

No wonder he was so disappointed by President Trump's lack of military aggression. Hillary would have kept Mattis very busy with implementing part-2 of the 16 year plan that Q described.


Lack of military aggression?


Mattis even took it upon himself to actively ignore an order from President Trump to have Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad assassinated. “Let’s [snip] kill him! Let’s go in,” Trump reportedly exclaimed to Mattis after a chemical attack on civilians in Khan Sheikhoun.


Yeah that’s not aggressive at all!

Do you even read your own sources? Or just the headline?



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

No. That is false.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
The DailyBeast article is false?



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

I'm referring to large-scale aggression that brings glory to military leaders. "Droning" someone, like Hillary wanted to do to Assange, or Trump wanted to do to Assad, doesn't cut the mustard.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: liveandlearn

Iran checkmate — you thought living next door to the U.S. military was uncomfortable..."say hello to My best Saudi friend."

Maybe early 2019 we could have a military parade.

Iran will be busy fighting the last ISIS pockets.

“Update: Tiger Forces to begin offensive against ISIS in east Deir Ezzor”
www.almasdarnews.com...

turcopolier.typepad.com...

Thomas Wictor is worth a read on this topic and the Mattis resignation more generally.

quodverum.com...


As Wictor described the New DoD site is worth checking out..

OLD to NEW



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:10 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

More or less at least IMO. See my post above with Wictor link.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:12 PM
link   
Want to see what an organization with a lot to hide, or a major vendetta against President Trump does?

Letter from CREW to OIG Horowitz: s3.amazonaws.com...

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW): www.citizensforethics.org...



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: carewemust

More or less at least IMO. See my post above with Wictor link.


Thank-you. I'll go read quodverum.com... now.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:16 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Assassinating Assad is large scale.

The repurcussions would be huge.

But yes, downplay it because it doesn’t fit your narrative.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: CoramDeo
a reply to: FlyingFox

I thought Sorcha Faal was off limits.

Taking a quick look at the site, it looks like they adopeted the Q narrative.

I dunno. I wouldn't use them as a source.


Sorry, I didn't have a source for the material, but it all rang true, kind of.

Thanks.



posted on Dec, 21 2018 @ 11:28 PM
link   
It's also only treating the symptom.



posted on Dec, 22 2018 @ 01:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: carewemust

Assassinating Assad is large scale.

The repurcussions would be huge.

But yes, downplay it because it doesn’t fit your narrative.


Tell me Chad, where is the proof that The President ever said anything remotely like what was stated.

More secret sources, leaks that don't get out of the White House.

But yes, play up the supposed leak like it is actually factual.

More fake crap news.

P



posted on Dec, 22 2018 @ 01:07 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

It’s in your comrade carewemust’s source, so it must be ok.



edit on 22/12/18 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2018 @ 01:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

You did not answer the question.

You are the one relying on this piece of drivel to belittle the President ... so ... state you case for belief.

Spray and pray is not worth it.

P




top topics



 
130
<< 129  130  131    133  134  135 >>

log in

join