It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Last Steel Column From the Ground Zero Rubble Is Cut Down
www.nytimes.com...
Column No. 1,001 B of 2 World Trade Center, the last symbolic piece of the unfathomable recovery effort, was cut down at 8:17 p.m. yesterday by operating engineers, ironworkers, teamsters, laborers and dock builders.
The 58-ton piece of steel from the south tower was laid on a flatbed truck, wrapped in black muslin and an American flag, and tucked in a corner of the pit. It will be taken out tomorrow morning as part of the ceremony marking the end of the recovery effort at ground zero. The world will participate by television
The Last Column is Removed from the WTC
m.youtube.com...
The Last Column: A Symbol of Resilience
m.youtube.com...
Final steel beam removed from Ground Zero
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: neutronflux
And this was the last remaining piece of foundation column standing? So there was more than one not vaporized by supposed nukes or supposed thermite that had to be cut off from the supposed fractured WTC foundation?
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: neutronflux
No reasonable person has ever claimed the WTC was brought down by nukes.
That you feel compelled to try to refute something that's nonsensical and believe that because something that clearly didn't happen, didn't happen somehow validates the OS or negates reasonable questions about the OS just shows that you shouldn't be taken seriously.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: neutronflux
No reasonable person has ever claimed the WTC was brought down by nukes.
That you feel compelled to try to refute something that's nonsensical and believe that because something that clearly didn't happen, didn't happen somehow validates the OS or negates reasonable questions about the OS just shows that you shouldn't be taken seriously.
Your thread is bad and you should feel bad.
This will answer 99% of your questions about 9/11.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: dfnj2015
Other than there were columns still standing, and not vaporized. No radiation above background. No contamination. The slurry wall still intact. No seismic evidence. The bedrock foundation was still intact, and standing columns had to be cut away. No indication of a shockwave and over pressure event from a nuclear blast.
9/11 and the Science
of Controlled Demolitions
www.skeptic.com...
3WHAT ABOUT THE ALMOST FREE-FALL COLLAPSE OF THE TWIN TOWERS? The key is the “almost” modifier. If I told you I was making almost $100,000 and you found out I was making only $67,000, you’d say I was exaggerating. So stop exaggerating the collapse speed of the WTC Towers! The 80,000 tons of structural steel slowed down the collapses of the Twin Towers to about ⅔ (two-thirds) of free-fall.3 And the core collapsed at about 40% of free-fall speed, coming down last.4 According to Richard Gage: “To bring a building symmetrically down, what we have to do is remove the core columns.” But on 9/11 the stronger core columns came down last, which violates this supposed most fundamental rule of controlled demolition.
the-pre-collapse-inward-bowing-of-wtc2.t4760/
www.metabunk.org...
Failure of Welded Floor Truss Connections from the Exterior Wall during Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers
app.aws.org...
originally posted by: Raggedyman
yeah it is very unusual that a beam didn’t fall down if it was nukes or thermite.
You know what else I think is also unusual, a whole building that wasn’t hit by a plane, built next to the two buildings that were, just falling down out of sympathy
That third building, nothing, no fire, no plane, no Nike’s or thermite, it just collapsed in on itself
You ask why a beam didn’t fall and I am asking why a whole building did
molten streams of metal
WTC7 fell like a stone, something that dodgy NIST had to rewrite their glorious collapse scenario to accommodate for.
15 years since hospital implosion tragety
www.canberratimes.com.au...
But instead, because of a series of systemic failures outlined in a 657-page report from the coroner, shrapnel was thrown more than 400m across the lake.
Katie, who had gone there with her family after church that Sunday morning, was struck in the head with a 1kg piece of steel, reportedly travelling at up to 150km a second, and died instantly.
Canberra Hospital Implosion 1997
m.youtube.com...
Couple Nearly Killed By A Flying Rock From Building Demolition
m.youtube.com...
Now a Johnny-come-lately wants to do a ha,ha...not particularly on nukes I might say, but to enforce the idea that it was all done by those aircraft and nothing else.
originally posted by: fusiondoe
So how did WTC 7 fall, serious question that I can never find a proper answer for?
www.metabunk.org...
other-wtc7-investigations-aegis-insurance-v-7-world-trade-company-expert-reports.t7112/