It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That so-called carbon tax had already increased diesel by 7.6 cents per litre and petrol by 3.9 cents in the last year, and it was due to rise again in January. Yet as the rage over the added expense spilled into the cities and on to front pages, the original reason for the increase became somewhat lost.
In comparison, 91% of British people believe climate change is partially caused by human activity, and just 66% believe the impact will be negative. Meanwhile, a report by the University of Michigan's Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy notes only 60% of Americans believe climate change is happening and humans are playing a part.
France's fuel tax aims to encourage motorists to use their cars less or switch to electric versions. The tax would also raise €34bn ($39bn; £30bn), although according to news agency Reuters, just €7.2bn will go towards the environment.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Bluntone22
It depends upon who is being taxed.
But how about a different model? Cap and trade seems to have been effective with SO2 reduction, without raising consumer prices.
originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Phage
Aside from driving and plastic products what's a proper scalable solution?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: amazing
*deep voice with heavy reverb*
In a perfect world...
it is industrial users and producers of fossil fuels who pay the taxes. They will, by necessity, pass those costs onto the consumer. But, in that world, the taxes collected are returned to the consumer via tax rebates and/or credits.