It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So today I interviewed an Exorcist Bishop. Zazz Podcast.

page: 5
102
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 07:37 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

The memory of past lives through your blood line could be coded unto your DNA... Is a thought.
Id prefer it to be an eternal spirit though




posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 11:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManyMasks
a reply to: sled735

The memory of past lives through your blood line could be coded unto your DNA... Is a thought.
Id prefer it to be an eternal spirit though


Maybe some is passed through DNA (I think there is scientific evidence of this), but I will refer you to a session that Brian L. Weiss M.D. told about in his book, Many Lives, Many Masters. He said he regressed a woman who in her past life could not have children, yet she remember many things about that life; names, buildings, events, etc., that were verified after her session.
So, if memory is only passed through DNA, then this woman couldn't have remembered what she did because there was no DNA (children) to pass it to.

So, there you go. You now have evidence to support that it IS the eternal spirit that comes back.



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 11:55 AM
link   
a reply to: sled735

Yeah that's a good one, thanks.



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 05:28 PM
link   
Double post deleted!
edit on 5/12/2018 by mirageman because: ...



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: zazzafrazz

Hey Zazz.


Although this particular topic isn't my cup of tea. I wish you the very best in your endeavours with your podcasts. It helps take ATS back to what, at least once upon a time, were the core subject matters here.

Please don't do a politics podcast


Regards MM



edit on 5/12/2018 by mirageman because: ...



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 05:41 PM
link   
a reply to: sled735

Except the scientific community doesn't recognize the mere words of someone as fact.

100% anecdotal.



posted on Dec, 5 2018 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

That's like getting an e-hug coming from you MM!

It's just a mini series, we'll see if we can prolong the pain by doing a longer run. lol.



posted on Dec, 6 2018 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: reject
a reply to: sled735

Except the scientific community doesn't recognize the mere words of someone as fact.

100% anecdotal.


It wasn't just mere words. The names, places, and events she described while under hypnosis was researched afterwards and found to be real. The names existed, events happened. Read his book. I don't need science to tell me what's real/true. I have a brain to do that for me.



posted on Dec, 6 2018 @ 10:51 PM
link   
I finally got a chance to listen to the whole thing, and it's excellent all the way through.
I do like his delivery of information as well as your interviewing skills.

It's a fascinating topic, and I hope you do more of these.



posted on Dec, 6 2018 @ 11:40 PM
link   
Finally got around to listening to this tonight. Wow! I really enjoyed it! I've done quite a bit of research into the supernatural over the years but I heard some insights here which I had not heard before. This is the kind of intelligent discussion on the supernatural I really enjoy! He's a very interesting man for sure! Thanks so much for this, Zazz! I'm always looking for good things to listen to while I work and I love a good supernatural podcast like this so I hope you do more!



posted on Dec, 7 2018 @ 10:33 PM
link   
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2

Thank you LCH!

At least 2 more, after that we'll see



posted on Dec, 8 2018 @ 01:54 AM
link   
a reply to: reject



Except the scientific community doesn't recognize the mere words of someone as fact.

100% anecdotal.


Law courts across the world recognise anecdotal evidence as actual evidence.

The science community is just a community. We also have a religious community and most folks don't believe them.

And with all the shenanigans of scientific proof surrounding global warming and climate change, perhaps most folks these days would trust the words of their neighbors before they would trust the science community?

I know I wouldn't trust Monsanto's scientific proof that glyphosate/ roundup (24D) is "safe".


edit on 8-12-2018 by Whatsthisthen because: typo



new topics

top topics



 
102
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join